Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India

This paper examines the complexities of commons governance, focusing on the role of multistakeholder platforms (MSPs) in addressing tensions among diverse decision-making centers. Drawing on the experiences of the Indian NGO Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) in Gujarat and Odisha, the study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElDidi, Hagar, Rawat, Shivanyaa, Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S., Chaturvedi, Rahul, Sanil, Richu
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141461
_version_ 1855519998222532608
author ElDidi, Hagar
Rawat, Shivanyaa
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Chaturvedi, Rahul
Sanil, Richu
author_browse Chaturvedi, Rahul
ElDidi, Hagar
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Rawat, Shivanyaa
Sanil, Richu
author_facet ElDidi, Hagar
Rawat, Shivanyaa
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Chaturvedi, Rahul
Sanil, Richu
author_sort ElDidi, Hagar
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper examines the complexities of commons governance, focusing on the role of multistakeholder platforms (MSPs) in addressing tensions among diverse decision-making centers. Drawing on the experiences of the Indian NGO Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) in Gujarat and Odisha, the study analyzes two MSPs operating at the block level, engaging communities, government, and private sector actors. Through surveys, interviews, and analysis of institutional reports, the research identifies key benefits of MSPs, including enhanced multi-stakeholder engagement, scale, and enabling conditions. It argues that MSPs can effectively support polycentric governance by facilitating inter-community collaboration, strengthening local voices, and building trust over time. The study also underscores the importance of external actors like NGOs in supporting community agency and fostering collaboration across different governance levels.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace141461
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1414612025-12-11T22:06:29Z Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India ElDidi, Hagar Rawat, Shivanyaa Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Chaturvedi, Rahul Sanil, Richu commons multi-stakeholder processes governance stakeholders non-governmental organizations collective action This paper examines the complexities of commons governance, focusing on the role of multistakeholder platforms (MSPs) in addressing tensions among diverse decision-making centers. Drawing on the experiences of the Indian NGO Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) in Gujarat and Odisha, the study analyzes two MSPs operating at the block level, engaging communities, government, and private sector actors. Through surveys, interviews, and analysis of institutional reports, the research identifies key benefits of MSPs, including enhanced multi-stakeholder engagement, scale, and enabling conditions. It argues that MSPs can effectively support polycentric governance by facilitating inter-community collaboration, strengthening local voices, and building trust over time. The study also underscores the importance of external actors like NGOs in supporting community agency and fostering collaboration across different governance levels. 2025-12 2024-04-12T20:47:42Z 2024-04-12T20:47:42Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141461 en https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134845 Limited Access Springer ElDidi, Hagar; Rawat, Shivanyaa; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth; Chaturvedi, Rahul; and Sanil, Richu. 2025. Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: insights from two case studies in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability 27(12): 29797–29823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04896-9
spellingShingle commons
multi-stakeholder processes
governance
stakeholders
non-governmental organizations
collective action
ElDidi, Hagar
Rawat, Shivanyaa
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Chaturvedi, Rahul
Sanil, Richu
Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India
title Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India
title_full Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India
title_fullStr Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India
title_full_unstemmed Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India
title_short Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India
title_sort polycentric governance of commons through multi stakeholder platforms insights from two case studies in india
topic commons
multi-stakeholder processes
governance
stakeholders
non-governmental organizations
collective action
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141461
work_keys_str_mv AT eldidihagar polycentricgovernanceofcommonsthroughmultistakeholderplatformsinsightsfromtwocasestudiesinindia
AT rawatshivanyaa polycentricgovernanceofcommonsthroughmultistakeholderplatformsinsightsfromtwocasestudiesinindia
AT meinzendickruths polycentricgovernanceofcommonsthroughmultistakeholderplatformsinsightsfromtwocasestudiesinindia
AT chaturvedirahul polycentricgovernanceofcommonsthroughmultistakeholderplatformsinsightsfromtwocasestudiesinindia
AT sanilrichu polycentricgovernanceofcommonsthroughmultistakeholderplatformsinsightsfromtwocasestudiesinindia