How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems

Background: Diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based hospital payment can potentially be inadequately low (or high) for highly variable, highly specialized, and/or low volume care. DRG-based payment can be combined with other payment mechanisms to avoid unintended consequences of inadequate payment. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quentin, Wilm, Stephani, Victor, Berenson, Robert A., Bilde, Lone, Grasic, Katja, Sikkut, Riina, Touré, Mariama, Geissler, Alexander
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Maad Rayan Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141367
_version_ 1855538049924988928
author Quentin, Wilm
Stephani, Victor
Berenson, Robert A.
Bilde, Lone
Grasic, Katja
Sikkut, Riina
Touré, Mariama
Geissler, Alexander
author_browse Berenson, Robert A.
Bilde, Lone
Geissler, Alexander
Grasic, Katja
Quentin, Wilm
Sikkut, Riina
Stephani, Victor
Touré, Mariama
author_facet Quentin, Wilm
Stephani, Victor
Berenson, Robert A.
Bilde, Lone
Grasic, Katja
Sikkut, Riina
Touré, Mariama
Geissler, Alexander
author_sort Quentin, Wilm
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Background: Diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based hospital payment can potentially be inadequately low (or high) for highly variable, highly specialized, and/or low volume care. DRG-based payment can be combined with other payment mechanisms to avoid unintended consequences of inadequate payment. The aim of this study was to analyze these other payment mechanisms for acute inpatient care across six countries (Germany, Denmark, England, Estonia, France, the United States [Medicare]). Methods: Information was collected about elements excluded from DRG-based payment, the rationale for exclusions, and payment mechanisms complementing DRG-based payment. A conceptual framework was developed to systematically describe, visualise and compare payment mechanisms across countries. Results: Results show that the complexity of exclusion mechanisms and associated additional payment components differ across countries. England and Germany use many different additional mechanisms, while there are only few exceptions from DRG-based payment in the Medicare program in the United States. Certain areas of care are almost always excluded (eg, certain areas of cancer care or specialized pediatrics). Denmark and England use exclusion mechanisms to steer service provision for highly complex patients to specialized providers. Conclusion: Implications for researchers and policy-makers include: (1) certain areas of care might be better excluded from DRG-based payment; (2) exclusions may be used to incentivize the concentration of highly specialized care at specialized institutions (as in Denmark or England); (3) researchers may apply our analytical framework to better understand the specific design features of DRG-based payment systems.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace141367
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Maad Rayan Publishing Company
publisherStr Maad Rayan Publishing Company
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1413672025-10-26T13:01:22Z How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems Quentin, Wilm Stephani, Victor Berenson, Robert A. Bilde, Lone Grasic, Katja Sikkut, Riina Touré, Mariama Geissler, Alexander costs prospective payment system international comparisons financing remuneration prices health care Background: Diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based hospital payment can potentially be inadequately low (or high) for highly variable, highly specialized, and/or low volume care. DRG-based payment can be combined with other payment mechanisms to avoid unintended consequences of inadequate payment. The aim of this study was to analyze these other payment mechanisms for acute inpatient care across six countries (Germany, Denmark, England, Estonia, France, the United States [Medicare]). Methods: Information was collected about elements excluded from DRG-based payment, the rationale for exclusions, and payment mechanisms complementing DRG-based payment. A conceptual framework was developed to systematically describe, visualise and compare payment mechanisms across countries. Results: Results show that the complexity of exclusion mechanisms and associated additional payment components differ across countries. England and Germany use many different additional mechanisms, while there are only few exceptions from DRG-based payment in the Medicare program in the United States. Certain areas of care are almost always excluded (eg, certain areas of cancer care or specialized pediatrics). Denmark and England use exclusion mechanisms to steer service provision for highly complex patients to specialized providers. Conclusion: Implications for researchers and policy-makers include: (1) certain areas of care might be better excluded from DRG-based payment; (2) exclusions may be used to incentivize the concentration of highly specialized care at specialized institutions (as in Denmark or England); (3) researchers may apply our analytical framework to better understand the specific design features of DRG-based payment systems. 2022-05-07 2024-04-12T13:37:46Z 2024-04-12T13:37:46Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141367 en https://kce.fgov.be/en/payment-methods-for-hospital-stays-with-a-large-variability-in-the-care-process Open Access Maad Rayan Publishing Company Quentin, Wilm; Stephani, Victor; Berenson, Robert A.; Bilde, Lone; Grasic, Katja; Sikkut, Riina; Touré, Mariama; and Geissler, Alexander. How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 11(12) 2940-2950. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6536
spellingShingle costs
prospective payment system
international comparisons
financing
remuneration
prices
health care
Quentin, Wilm
Stephani, Victor
Berenson, Robert A.
Bilde, Lone
Grasic, Katja
Sikkut, Riina
Touré, Mariama
Geissler, Alexander
How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems
title How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems
title_full How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems
title_fullStr How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems
title_full_unstemmed How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems
title_short How Denmark, England, Estonia, France, Germany, and the USA pay for variable, specialized and low volume care: A cross-country comparison of in-patient payment systems
title_sort how denmark england estonia france germany and the usa pay for variable specialized and low volume care a cross country comparison of in patient payment systems
topic costs
prospective payment system
international comparisons
financing
remuneration
prices
health care
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141367
work_keys_str_mv AT quentinwilm howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems
AT stephanivictor howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems
AT berensonroberta howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems
AT bildelone howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems
AT grasickatja howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems
AT sikkutriina howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems
AT touremariama howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems
AT geissleralexander howdenmarkenglandestoniafrancegermanyandtheusapayforvariablespecializedandlowvolumecareacrosscountrycomparisonofinpatientpaymentsystems