What changed when Ugandan farmers rated input quality and local vendor services
Each agricultural season, small-scale maize farmers in southeastern Uganda face the same dilemma. Should they shell out a few extra shillings and buy commercial maize seed from the nearby agro-input shop, or should they just plant seed saved from the previous harvest?
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Opinion Piece |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
The Conversation
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141109 |
Similar Items: What changed when Ugandan farmers rated input quality and local vendor services
- Lifting quality constraints to agricultural technology adoption in the Ugandan market for maize seed
- Lifting quality constraints to agricultural technology adoption in the Ugandan market for maize seed
- Miracle seeds: Biased expectations, complementary input use, and the dynamics of smallholder technology adoption
- Miracle seeds: Biased expectations, complementary input use, and the dynamics of smallholder technology adoption
- ‘Miracle seeds,’ informational curses? The risk of high expectations for new agricultural technologies
- How misinformation and mismatched expectations reduce adoption of improved seeds