Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming

The study compared growth performance and economic characteristics of three strains (Akosombo generation 11, Huawei and Fish Reit) of Nile tilapia in cages under small-scale commercial farm management practice. A total of six cages were each stocked at 32 fish/m3 with 4,200 fingerlings at stocking s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babe, M., Agyakwah, S. K., Amevenku, F. K., Mensah, E. T-D., Asmah, Ruby, Ragasa, Catherine, Trong, Q. T.
Formato: Infographic
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2022
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141100
_version_ 1855533036461883392
author Babe, M.
Agyakwah, S. K.
Amevenku, F. K.
Mensah, E. T-D.
Asmah, Ruby
Ragasa, Catherine
Trong, Q. T.
author_browse Agyakwah, S. K.
Amevenku, F. K.
Asmah, Ruby
Babe, M.
Mensah, E. T-D.
Ragasa, Catherine
Trong, Q. T.
author_facet Babe, M.
Agyakwah, S. K.
Amevenku, F. K.
Mensah, E. T-D.
Asmah, Ruby
Ragasa, Catherine
Trong, Q. T.
author_sort Babe, M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The study compared growth performance and economic characteristics of three strains (Akosombo generation 11, Huawei and Fish Reit) of Nile tilapia in cages under small-scale commercial farm management practice. A total of six cages were each stocked at 32 fish/m3 with 4,200 fingerlings at stocking size of 2.00 ± 1.09 g. Water quality parameters were within acceptable limits and readings showed no significant differences between treatments (p > 0.05). After 136 days of culture, the final mean weight for Huawei (393.30 ± 100.70 g) was significantly higher than Fish Reit (204.90 ± 53.15 g) and Akosombo strain (190.50 ± 48.75 g)(p < 0.05). Mean yield for Huawei was significantly higher (10.35 kg/m3) than Akosombo strain (3.16 kg/m3) (p < 0.05) but neither of these two were different from Fish Reit (6.28 kg/m3) (p > 0.05). Economic indicators of performance also revealed that the Huawei strain performed better followed by Fish Reit and ARDEC Akosombo strain in that order. However, the sources of the Huawei and Fish Reit strains are not known with certainty thus making it difficult to be relied upon for the development of stocking materials. The study recommends that challenges related to the development of the local, better known ARDEC Akosombo strain be tackled by researchers and policy makers to address issues of inadequate supply of quality seeds of desirable economic characteristics on sustainable basis.
format Infographic
id CGSpace141100
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1411002025-11-06T07:01:46Z Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming Babe, M. Agyakwah, S. K. Amevenku, F. K. Mensah, E. T-D. Asmah, Ruby Ragasa, Catherine Trong, Q. T. The study compared growth performance and economic characteristics of three strains (Akosombo generation 11, Huawei and Fish Reit) of Nile tilapia in cages under small-scale commercial farm management practice. A total of six cages were each stocked at 32 fish/m3 with 4,200 fingerlings at stocking size of 2.00 ± 1.09 g. Water quality parameters were within acceptable limits and readings showed no significant differences between treatments (p > 0.05). After 136 days of culture, the final mean weight for Huawei (393.30 ± 100.70 g) was significantly higher than Fish Reit (204.90 ± 53.15 g) and Akosombo strain (190.50 ± 48.75 g)(p < 0.05). Mean yield for Huawei was significantly higher (10.35 kg/m3) than Akosombo strain (3.16 kg/m3) (p < 0.05) but neither of these two were different from Fish Reit (6.28 kg/m3) (p > 0.05). Economic indicators of performance also revealed that the Huawei strain performed better followed by Fish Reit and ARDEC Akosombo strain in that order. However, the sources of the Huawei and Fish Reit strains are not known with certainty thus making it difficult to be relied upon for the development of stocking materials. The study recommends that challenges related to the development of the local, better known ARDEC Akosombo strain be tackled by researchers and policy makers to address issues of inadequate supply of quality seeds of desirable economic characteristics on sustainable basis. 2022-12-30 2024-04-12T13:37:17Z 2024-04-12T13:37:17Z Infographic https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141100 en Open Access application/pdf Babe, M.; Agyakwah, S. K.; Amevenku, F. K.; Mensah, E. T-D.; Asmah, Ruby; Ragasa, Catherine; Trong, Q. T. 2023. Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming.
spellingShingle Babe, M.
Agyakwah, S. K.
Amevenku, F. K.
Mensah, E. T-D.
Asmah, Ruby
Ragasa, Catherine
Trong, Q. T.
Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming
title Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming
title_full Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming
title_fullStr Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming
title_short Comparative study of production and profitability of strains of Nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming
title_sort comparative study of production and profitability of strains of nile tilapia for small scale commercial cage farming
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141100
work_keys_str_mv AT babem comparativestudyofproductionandprofitabilityofstrainsofniletilapiaforsmallscalecommercialcagefarming
AT agyakwahsk comparativestudyofproductionandprofitabilityofstrainsofniletilapiaforsmallscalecommercialcagefarming
AT amevenkufk comparativestudyofproductionandprofitabilityofstrainsofniletilapiaforsmallscalecommercialcagefarming
AT mensahetd comparativestudyofproductionandprofitabilityofstrainsofniletilapiaforsmallscalecommercialcagefarming
AT asmahruby comparativestudyofproductionandprofitabilityofstrainsofniletilapiaforsmallscalecommercialcagefarming
AT ragasacatherine comparativestudyofproductionandprofitabilityofstrainsofniletilapiaforsmallscalecommercialcagefarming
AT trongqt comparativestudyofproductionandprofitabilityofstrainsofniletilapiaforsmallscalecommercialcagefarming