Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices

The degree to which soil is susceptible to erosion is measured as soil erodibility which can be influenced by different land management options. This study evaluated the dynamics of soil erodibility to tillage and soil amendments in a maize field under five consecutive cropping cycles. Tillage treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mesele, S.A.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Maximum Academic Press 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/140710
_version_ 1855521253565136896
author Mesele, S.A.
author_browse Mesele, S.A.
author_facet Mesele, S.A.
author_sort Mesele, S.A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The degree to which soil is susceptible to erosion is measured as soil erodibility which can be influenced by different land management options. This study evaluated the dynamics of soil erodibility to tillage and soil amendments in a maize field under five consecutive cropping cycles. Tillage treatments were no-till, minimum, conventional, and grassland fallow (control). The soil amendment treatments used were no amendment (control), NPK, poultry manure (PM), and ½ NPK+ ½ PM and these treatments were applied to all the tillage treatments including no-till. The study showed that tillage and soil amendment interactions had significant effects on soil erodibility (p< 0.05). The mean erodibility values ranged from 13× 10− 3 to 24× 10− 3 Mg· h· MJ− 1· mm− 1 in the following order: control< conventional tillage< minimum tillage< no-till. For the soil amendments, erodibility varied from NPK> poultry manure= ½ NPK+ ½ PM> control (undisturbed grassland). Regardless of the type of soil amendment, the soil erodibility under conventional tillage was significantly lower than that under no-till and minimum tillage systems. The relationship between erodibility and easily measured soil parameters, such as% sand greater than 100 µm,% silt plus very fine sand, clay, and saturated hydraulic conductivity, were significant at p< 0.05. The higher contribution (86%) of sand and silt to the variation in erodibility indicates that any other indices of erodibility based on particle size distribution, apart from the nomograph, could satisfactorily predict erodibility values.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace140710
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Maximum Academic Press
publisherStr Maximum Academic Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1407102025-11-11T10:11:29Z Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices Mesele, S.A. conservation agriculture soil erosion soil fertility land degradation ghana tillage The degree to which soil is susceptible to erosion is measured as soil erodibility which can be influenced by different land management options. This study evaluated the dynamics of soil erodibility to tillage and soil amendments in a maize field under five consecutive cropping cycles. Tillage treatments were no-till, minimum, conventional, and grassland fallow (control). The soil amendment treatments used were no amendment (control), NPK, poultry manure (PM), and ½ NPK+ ½ PM and these treatments were applied to all the tillage treatments including no-till. The study showed that tillage and soil amendment interactions had significant effects on soil erodibility (p< 0.05). The mean erodibility values ranged from 13× 10− 3 to 24× 10− 3 Mg· h· MJ− 1· mm− 1 in the following order: control< conventional tillage< minimum tillage< no-till. For the soil amendments, erodibility varied from NPK> poultry manure= ½ NPK+ ½ PM> control (undisturbed grassland). Regardless of the type of soil amendment, the soil erodibility under conventional tillage was significantly lower than that under no-till and minimum tillage systems. The relationship between erodibility and easily measured soil parameters, such as% sand greater than 100 µm,% silt plus very fine sand, clay, and saturated hydraulic conductivity, were significant at p< 0.05. The higher contribution (86%) of sand and silt to the variation in erodibility indicates that any other indices of erodibility based on particle size distribution, apart from the nomograph, could satisfactorily predict erodibility values. 2024 2024-04-02T09:52:06Z 2024-04-02T09:52:06Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/140710 en Open Access application/pdf Maximum Academic Press Mesele, S.A. (2024). Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices. Circular Agricultural Systems, 4(1): e004, 1-7.
spellingShingle conservation agriculture
soil erosion
soil fertility
land degradation
ghana
tillage
Mesele, S.A.
Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
title Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
title_full Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
title_fullStr Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
title_full_unstemmed Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
title_short Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
title_sort changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
topic conservation agriculture
soil erosion
soil fertility
land degradation
ghana
tillage
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/140710
work_keys_str_mv AT meselesa changesinsoilsusceptibilitytoerosionundertillageandsoilfertilitymanagementpractices