Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data

Background: Bolstering farm-level crop diversity is one strategy to strengthen food system resilience and achieve global food security. Women who live in rural areas play an essential role in food production; therefore, we aimed to assess the associations between women's empowerment and crop diversi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connors, Kaela, Jaacks, Lindsay M., Awasthi, Ananya, Becker, Karoline, Kerr, Rachel Bezner, Fivian, Emily, Gelli, Aulo, Harris-Fry, Helen, Heckert, Jessica, Kadiyala, Suneetha, Martinez, Elena M., Santoso, Marianne V., Young, Sera L., Bliznashka, Lilia
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/139988
_version_ 1855536846716534784
author Connors, Kaela
Jaacks, Lindsay M.
Awasthi, Ananya
Becker, Karoline
Kerr, Rachel Bezner
Fivian, Emily
Gelli, Aulo
Harris-Fry, Helen
Heckert, Jessica
Kadiyala, Suneetha
Martinez, Elena M.
Santoso, Marianne V.
Young, Sera L.
Bliznashka, Lilia
author_browse Awasthi, Ananya
Becker, Karoline
Bliznashka, Lilia
Connors, Kaela
Fivian, Emily
Gelli, Aulo
Harris-Fry, Helen
Heckert, Jessica
Jaacks, Lindsay M.
Kadiyala, Suneetha
Kerr, Rachel Bezner
Martinez, Elena M.
Santoso, Marianne V.
Young, Sera L.
author_facet Connors, Kaela
Jaacks, Lindsay M.
Awasthi, Ananya
Becker, Karoline
Kerr, Rachel Bezner
Fivian, Emily
Gelli, Aulo
Harris-Fry, Helen
Heckert, Jessica
Kadiyala, Suneetha
Martinez, Elena M.
Santoso, Marianne V.
Young, Sera L.
Bliznashka, Lilia
author_sort Connors, Kaela
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Background: Bolstering farm-level crop diversity is one strategy to strengthen food system resilience and achieve global food security. Women who live in rural areas play an essential role in food production; therefore, we aimed to assess the associations between women's empowerment and crop diversity. Methods: In this secondary analysis of cross-sectional data, we used data from four cluster-randomised controlled trials done in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania. We assessed women's empowerment using indicators from the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index. Farm-level crop diversity measures were the number of food crops grown, number of food groups grown, and if nutrient-dense crops were grown. We used a two-stage modelling approach. First, we analysed covariate-adjusted country-specific associations between women's empowerment and crop diversity indicators using multivariable generalised linear models. Second, we pooled country-specific associations using random-effects models. Findings: The final analytic sample included 1735 women from Burkina Faso, 4450 women from India, 547 women from Malawi, and 574 women from Tanzania. Across all countries, compared with households in which women provided input into fewer productive decisions, households of women with greater input into productive decisions produced more food crops (mean difference 0·36 [95% CI 0·16–0·55]), a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·16 [0·06–0·25]), and more nutrient-dense crops (percentage point difference 3 [95% CI 3–4]). Across all countries, each additional community group a woman actively participated in was associated with cultivating a higher number of food crops (mean difference 0·20 [0·04–0·35]) and a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·11 [0·03–0·18]), but not more nutrient-dense crops. In pooled associations from Burkina Faso and India, asset ownership was associated with cultivating a higher number of food crops (mean difference 0·08 [0·04–0·12]) and a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·05 [0·04–0·07]), but not more nutrient-dense crops. Interpretation: Greater women's empowerment was associated with higher farm-level crop diversity among low-income agricultural households, suggesting that it could help enhance efforts to strengthen food system resilience.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace139988
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1399882025-10-26T13:02:24Z Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data Connors, Kaela Jaacks, Lindsay M. Awasthi, Ananya Becker, Karoline Kerr, Rachel Bezner Fivian, Emily Gelli, Aulo Harris-Fry, Helen Heckert, Jessica Kadiyala, Suneetha Martinez, Elena M. Santoso, Marianne V. Young, Sera L. Bliznashka, Lilia data analysis data women's empowerment food production crops households agriculture food security diversification rural areas resilience Background: Bolstering farm-level crop diversity is one strategy to strengthen food system resilience and achieve global food security. Women who live in rural areas play an essential role in food production; therefore, we aimed to assess the associations between women's empowerment and crop diversity. Methods: In this secondary analysis of cross-sectional data, we used data from four cluster-randomised controlled trials done in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania. We assessed women's empowerment using indicators from the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index. Farm-level crop diversity measures were the number of food crops grown, number of food groups grown, and if nutrient-dense crops were grown. We used a two-stage modelling approach. First, we analysed covariate-adjusted country-specific associations between women's empowerment and crop diversity indicators using multivariable generalised linear models. Second, we pooled country-specific associations using random-effects models. Findings: The final analytic sample included 1735 women from Burkina Faso, 4450 women from India, 547 women from Malawi, and 574 women from Tanzania. Across all countries, compared with households in which women provided input into fewer productive decisions, households of women with greater input into productive decisions produced more food crops (mean difference 0·36 [95% CI 0·16–0·55]), a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·16 [0·06–0·25]), and more nutrient-dense crops (percentage point difference 3 [95% CI 3–4]). Across all countries, each additional community group a woman actively participated in was associated with cultivating a higher number of food crops (mean difference 0·20 [0·04–0·35]) and a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·11 [0·03–0·18]), but not more nutrient-dense crops. In pooled associations from Burkina Faso and India, asset ownership was associated with cultivating a higher number of food crops (mean difference 0·08 [0·04–0·12]) and a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·05 [0·04–0·07]), but not more nutrient-dense crops. Interpretation: Greater women's empowerment was associated with higher farm-level crop diversity among low-income agricultural households, suggesting that it could help enhance efforts to strengthen food system resilience. 2023-07 2024-03-14T12:08:48Z 2024-03-14T12:08:48Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/139988 en Open Access Elsevier Connors, Kaela; Jaacks, Lindsay M.; Awasthi, Ananya; Becker, Karoline; Kerr, Rachel Bezner; Gelli, Aulo; Heckert, Jessica; Kadiyala, Bliznashka, Lilia; et al. 2023. Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data. Lancet Planetary Health 7(7): e558-e569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00125-0
spellingShingle data analysis
data
women's empowerment
food production
crops
households
agriculture
food security
diversification
rural areas
resilience
Connors, Kaela
Jaacks, Lindsay M.
Awasthi, Ananya
Becker, Karoline
Kerr, Rachel Bezner
Fivian, Emily
Gelli, Aulo
Harris-Fry, Helen
Heckert, Jessica
Kadiyala, Suneetha
Martinez, Elena M.
Santoso, Marianne V.
Young, Sera L.
Bliznashka, Lilia
Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data
title Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data
title_full Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data
title_fullStr Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data
title_full_unstemmed Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data
title_short Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data
title_sort women s empowerment production choices and crop diversity in burkina faso india malawi and tanzania a secondary analysis of cross sectional data
topic data analysis
data
women's empowerment
food production
crops
households
agriculture
food security
diversification
rural areas
resilience
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/139988
work_keys_str_mv AT connorskaela womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT jaackslindsaym womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT awasthiananya womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT beckerkaroline womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT kerrrachelbezner womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT fivianemily womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT gelliaulo womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT harrisfryhelen womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT heckertjessica womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT kadiyalasuneetha womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT martinezelenam womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT santosomariannev womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT youngseral womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata
AT bliznashkalilia womensempowermentproductionchoicesandcropdiversityinburkinafasoindiamalawiandtanzaniaasecondaryanalysisofcrosssectionaldata