A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes
Trait prioritization studies have guided research, development and investment decisions for public-sector crop breeding programmes since the 1970s, but the research design, methods and tools underpinning these studies are not well understood. We used PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systema...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Springer
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/139766 |
| _version_ | 1855516948292435968 |
|---|---|
| author | Occelli, M. Mukerjee, Rishabh Miller, C. Porciello, J. Puerto, S. Garner, E. Guerra, M. Gomez, M. I. Tufan, Hale Ann |
| author_browse | Garner, E. Gomez, M. I. Guerra, M. Miller, C. Mukerjee, Rishabh Occelli, M. Porciello, J. Puerto, S. Tufan, Hale Ann |
| author_facet | Occelli, M. Mukerjee, Rishabh Miller, C. Porciello, J. Puerto, S. Garner, E. Guerra, M. Gomez, M. I. Tufan, Hale Ann |
| author_sort | Occelli, M. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Trait prioritization studies have guided research, development and investment decisions for public-sector crop breeding programmes since the 1970s, but the research design, methods and tools underpinning these studies are not well understood. We used PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) to evaluate research on trait ranking for major crops over the past 40 years (1980–2023). Data extraction and descriptive analysis on 657 papers show uneven attention to crops, lack of systematic sex disaggregation and regional bias. The lack of standardized trait data taxonomy across studies, and inconsistent research design and data collection practices make cross-comparison of findings impossible. In addition, network mapping of authors and donors shows patterns of concentration and the presence of silos within research areas. This study contributes to the next generation of innovation in trait preference studies to produce more inclusive, demand-driven varietal design that moves beyond trait prioritization focused on productivity and yield. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace139766 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1397662025-10-26T12:51:25Z A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes Occelli, M. Mukerjee, Rishabh Miller, C. Porciello, J. Puerto, S. Garner, E. Guerra, M. Gomez, M. I. Tufan, Hale Ann breeding programmes crops innovation research methods Trait prioritization studies have guided research, development and investment decisions for public-sector crop breeding programmes since the 1970s, but the research design, methods and tools underpinning these studies are not well understood. We used PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) to evaluate research on trait ranking for major crops over the past 40 years (1980–2023). Data extraction and descriptive analysis on 657 papers show uneven attention to crops, lack of systematic sex disaggregation and regional bias. The lack of standardized trait data taxonomy across studies, and inconsistent research design and data collection practices make cross-comparison of findings impossible. In addition, network mapping of authors and donors shows patterns of concentration and the presence of silos within research areas. This study contributes to the next generation of innovation in trait preference studies to produce more inclusive, demand-driven varietal design that moves beyond trait prioritization focused on productivity and yield. 2024-03 2024-02-29T17:24:39Z 2024-02-29T17:24:39Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/139766 en Open Access Springer Occelli, M.; Mukerjee, Rishabh; Miller, C.; Porciello, J.; Puerto, S.; Garner, E.; Guerra, M.; Gomez, M. I.; and Tufan, H. A. 2024. A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes. Nature Plants 10: 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01639-6 |
| spellingShingle | breeding programmes crops innovation research methods Occelli, M. Mukerjee, Rishabh Miller, C. Porciello, J. Puerto, S. Garner, E. Guerra, M. Gomez, M. I. Tufan, Hale Ann A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes |
| title | A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes |
| title_full | A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes |
| title_fullStr | A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes |
| title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes |
| title_short | A scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes |
| title_sort | scoping review on tools and methods for trait prioritization in crop breeding programmes |
| topic | breeding programmes crops innovation research methods |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/139766 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT occellim ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT mukerjeerishabh ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT millerc ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT porcielloj ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT puertos ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT garnere ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT guerram ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT gomezmi ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT tufanhaleann ascopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT occellim scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT mukerjeerishabh scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT millerc scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT porcielloj scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT puertos scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT garnere scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT guerram scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT gomezmi scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes AT tufanhaleann scopingreviewontoolsandmethodsfortraitprioritizationincropbreedingprogrammes |