Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh

There are few studies that rigorously assess how agricultural and nutrition related interventions enhance resilience and even fewer that incorporate a gendered dimension in their analysis. Mindful of this, we address three knowledge gaps: (1) Whether agricultural interventions aimed at diversifying...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoddinott, John F., Ahmed, Akhter, Quisumbing, Agnes R., Rakshit, Deboleena
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137823
_version_ 1855534004208402432
author Hoddinott, John F.
Ahmed, Akhter
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Rakshit, Deboleena
author_browse Ahmed, Akhter
Hoddinott, John F.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Rakshit, Deboleena
author_facet Hoddinott, John F.
Ahmed, Akhter
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Rakshit, Deboleena
author_sort Hoddinott, John F.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description There are few studies that rigorously assess how agricultural and nutrition related interventions enhance resilience and even fewer that incorporate a gendered dimension in their analysis. Mindful of this, we address three knowledge gaps: (1) Whether agricultural interventions aimed at diversifying income sources and improving nutrition have sustainable impacts (on asset bases, consumption, gender-specific outcomes and women’s empowerment, and on diets) that persist after the intervention ends; (2) whether such interventions are protective when shocks occur? and (3) whether these interventions promote gender-sensitive resilience. We answer these questions using unique data, a four-year post-endline follow up survey of households from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a nutrition-and-gender-sensitive agricultural intervention in Bangladesh. We find that treatment arms that included both agriculture and nutrition training had sustainable effects on real per capita consumption, women’s empowerment (as measured by the pro-WEAI), and asset holdings measured four years after the original intervention ended. Treatment arms that included both agriculture and nutrition training (with or without gender sensitization) reduced the likelihood that households undertook more severe forms of coping strategies and reduced the likelihood that household per capita consumption fell, in real terms, by more than five percent between in the four years following the end of the intervention. The treatment arm that only provided training in agriculture had positive impacts at endline but these had largely faded away four years later. Our results suggest that bundling nutrition and agriculture training may contribute to resilience as well as to sustained impacts on consumption, women’s empowerment, and asset holdings in the medium term. These have implications for the design of future gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace137823
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1378232025-11-06T07:07:24Z Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh Hoddinott, John F. Ahmed, Akhter Quisumbing, Agnes R. Rakshit, Deboleena resilience agriculture nutrition gender women's empowerment There are few studies that rigorously assess how agricultural and nutrition related interventions enhance resilience and even fewer that incorporate a gendered dimension in their analysis. Mindful of this, we address three knowledge gaps: (1) Whether agricultural interventions aimed at diversifying income sources and improving nutrition have sustainable impacts (on asset bases, consumption, gender-specific outcomes and women’s empowerment, and on diets) that persist after the intervention ends; (2) whether such interventions are protective when shocks occur? and (3) whether these interventions promote gender-sensitive resilience. We answer these questions using unique data, a four-year post-endline follow up survey of households from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a nutrition-and-gender-sensitive agricultural intervention in Bangladesh. We find that treatment arms that included both agriculture and nutrition training had sustainable effects on real per capita consumption, women’s empowerment (as measured by the pro-WEAI), and asset holdings measured four years after the original intervention ended. Treatment arms that included both agriculture and nutrition training (with or without gender sensitization) reduced the likelihood that households undertook more severe forms of coping strategies and reduced the likelihood that household per capita consumption fell, in real terms, by more than five percent between in the four years following the end of the intervention. The treatment arm that only provided training in agriculture had positive impacts at endline but these had largely faded away four years later. Our results suggest that bundling nutrition and agriculture training may contribute to resilience as well as to sustained impacts on consumption, women’s empowerment, and asset holdings in the medium term. These have implications for the design of future gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs. 2023-12-31 2024-01-16T21:39:18Z 2024-01-16T21:39:18Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137823 en https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12427 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105622 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Hoddinott, John; Ahmed, Akhter; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; and Rakshit, Deboleena. 2023. Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh. IFPRI Discussion Paper 2231. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137823
spellingShingle resilience
agriculture
nutrition
gender
women's empowerment
Hoddinott, John F.
Ahmed, Akhter
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Rakshit, Deboleena
Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh
title Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh
title_full Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh
title_fullStr Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh
title_short Can gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience? Medium-term impacts of an intervention in Bangladesh
title_sort can gender and nutrition sensitive agricultural programs improve resilience medium term impacts of an intervention in bangladesh
topic resilience
agriculture
nutrition
gender
women's empowerment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137823
work_keys_str_mv AT hoddinottjohnf cangenderandnutritionsensitiveagriculturalprogramsimproveresiliencemediumtermimpactsofaninterventioninbangladesh
AT ahmedakhter cangenderandnutritionsensitiveagriculturalprogramsimproveresiliencemediumtermimpactsofaninterventioninbangladesh
AT quisumbingagnesr cangenderandnutritionsensitiveagriculturalprogramsimproveresiliencemediumtermimpactsofaninterventioninbangladesh
AT rakshitdeboleena cangenderandnutritionsensitiveagriculturalprogramsimproveresiliencemediumtermimpactsofaninterventioninbangladesh