Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi

Initiatives to combat climate change often strive to include women’s voices, but there is limited evidence on how this feature influences program design or its benefits for women. We examine the causal effect of women’s representation in climate-related deliberations using the case of community-mana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clayton, Amanda, Dulani, Boniface, Kosec, Katrina, Robinson, Amanda Lea
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137365
_version_ 1855528726918332416
author Clayton, Amanda
Dulani, Boniface
Kosec, Katrina
Robinson, Amanda Lea
author_browse Clayton, Amanda
Dulani, Boniface
Kosec, Katrina
Robinson, Amanda Lea
author_facet Clayton, Amanda
Dulani, Boniface
Kosec, Katrina
Robinson, Amanda Lea
author_sort Clayton, Amanda
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Initiatives to combat climate change often strive to include women’s voices, but there is limited evidence on how this feature influences program design or its benefits for women. We examine the causal effect of women’s representation in climate-related deliberations using the case of community-managed forests in rural Malawi. We run a lab-in-the-field experiment that randomly varies the gender composition of six-member groups asked to privately vote, deliberate, then privately vote again on their preferred policy to combat local over-harvesting. We find that any given woman has relatively more influence in group deliberations when women make up a larger share of the group. This result cannot be explained by changes in participants’ talk time. Rather, women’s presence changes the content of deliberations towards topics on which women tend to have greater expertise. Our work suggests that including women in decision-making can shift deliberative processes in ways that amplify women’s voices.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace137365
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1373652025-12-02T21:03:03Z Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi Clayton, Amanda Dulani, Boniface Kosec, Katrina Robinson, Amanda Lea gender natural resources management natural resources governance women's empowerment community forestry decision making poverty capacity development Initiatives to combat climate change often strive to include women’s voices, but there is limited evidence on how this feature influences program design or its benefits for women. We examine the causal effect of women’s representation in climate-related deliberations using the case of community-managed forests in rural Malawi. We run a lab-in-the-field experiment that randomly varies the gender composition of six-member groups asked to privately vote, deliberate, then privately vote again on their preferred policy to combat local over-harvesting. We find that any given woman has relatively more influence in group deliberations when women make up a larger share of the group. This result cannot be explained by changes in participants’ talk time. Rather, women’s presence changes the content of deliberations towards topics on which women tend to have greater expertise. Our work suggests that including women in decision-making can shift deliberative processes in ways that amplify women’s voices. 2023-12-31 2024-01-08T23:34:00Z 2024-01-08T23:34:00Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137365 en https://hdl.handle.net/10568/136932 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/126903 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Clayton, Amanda; Dulani, Boniface; Kosec, Katrina; and Robinson, Amanda Lea. 2023. Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi. IFPRI Discussion Paper 2232. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137365
spellingShingle gender
natural resources management
natural resources
governance
women's empowerment
community forestry
decision making
poverty
capacity development
Clayton, Amanda
Dulani, Boniface
Kosec, Katrina
Robinson, Amanda Lea
Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi
title Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi
title_full Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi
title_fullStr Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi
title_short Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi
title_sort gender deliberation and natural resource governance experimental evidence from malawi
topic gender
natural resources management
natural resources
governance
women's empowerment
community forestry
decision making
poverty
capacity development
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137365
work_keys_str_mv AT claytonamanda genderdeliberationandnaturalresourcegovernanceexperimentalevidencefrommalawi
AT dulaniboniface genderdeliberationandnaturalresourcegovernanceexperimentalevidencefrommalawi
AT koseckatrina genderdeliberationandnaturalresourcegovernanceexperimentalevidencefrommalawi
AT robinsonamandalea genderdeliberationandnaturalresourcegovernanceexperimentalevidencefrommalawi