Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale
Peatlands cover only 3–4% of the Earth’s surface, but they store nearly 30% of global soil carbon stock. This significant carbon store is under threat as peatlands continue to be degraded at alarming rates around the world. It has prompted countries worldwide to establish regulations to conserve and...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Springer
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/135828 |
| _version_ | 1855540162323283968 |
|---|---|
| author | Minasny, B. Adetsu, D.V. Aitkenhead, M. Artz, R.R.E. Baggaley, N. Barthelmes, A. Beucher, A. Caron, J. Conchedda, Giulia Connolly, J. Deragon, R. Evans, C. Fadnes, K. Fiantis, D. Gagkas, Z. Gilet, L. Gimona, A. Glatzel, S. Greve, M.H. Habib, W. Hergoualc'h, Kristell Hermansen, C. Kidd, D.B. Koganti, T. Kopansky, D. Large, D.J. Larmola, T. Lilly, A. Liu, H. Marcus, M. Middleton, M. Morrison, K. Petersen, R.J. Quaife, T. Rochefort, L. Rudiyanto Toca, L. Tubiello, F.N. Weber, P.L. Weldon, S. Widyatmanti, W. Williamson, J. Zak, D. |
| author_browse | Adetsu, D.V. Aitkenhead, M. Artz, R.R.E. Baggaley, N. Barthelmes, A. Beucher, A. Caron, J. Conchedda, Giulia Connolly, J. Deragon, R. Evans, C. Fadnes, K. Fiantis, D. Gagkas, Z. Gilet, L. Gimona, A. Glatzel, S. Greve, M.H. Habib, W. Hergoualc'h, Kristell Hermansen, C. Kidd, D.B. Koganti, T. Kopansky, D. Large, D.J. Larmola, T. Lilly, A. Liu, H. Marcus, M. Middleton, M. Minasny, B. Morrison, K. Petersen, R.J. Quaife, T. Rochefort, L. Rudiyanto Toca, L. Tubiello, F.N. Weber, P.L. Weldon, S. Widyatmanti, W. Williamson, J. Zak, D. |
| author_facet | Minasny, B. Adetsu, D.V. Aitkenhead, M. Artz, R.R.E. Baggaley, N. Barthelmes, A. Beucher, A. Caron, J. Conchedda, Giulia Connolly, J. Deragon, R. Evans, C. Fadnes, K. Fiantis, D. Gagkas, Z. Gilet, L. Gimona, A. Glatzel, S. Greve, M.H. Habib, W. Hergoualc'h, Kristell Hermansen, C. Kidd, D.B. Koganti, T. Kopansky, D. Large, D.J. Larmola, T. Lilly, A. Liu, H. Marcus, M. Middleton, M. Morrison, K. Petersen, R.J. Quaife, T. Rochefort, L. Rudiyanto Toca, L. Tubiello, F.N. Weber, P.L. Weldon, S. Widyatmanti, W. Williamson, J. Zak, D. |
| author_sort | Minasny, B. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Peatlands cover only 3–4% of the Earth’s surface, but they store nearly 30% of global soil carbon stock. This significant carbon store is under threat as peatlands continue to be degraded at alarming rates around the world. It has prompted countries worldwide to establish regulations to conserve and reduce emissions from this carbon rich ecosystem. For example, the EU has implemented new rules that mandate sustainable management of peatlands, critical to reaching the goal of carbon neutrality by 2050. However, a lack of information on the extent and condition of peatlands has hindered the development of national policies and restoration efforts. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge on mapping and monitoring peatlands from field sites to the globe and identifies areas where further research is needed. It presents an overview of the different methodologies used to map peatlands in nine countries, which vary in definition of peat soil and peatland, mapping coverage, and mapping detail. Whereas mapping peatlands across the world with only one approach is hardly possible, the paper highlights the need for more consistent approaches within regions having comparable peatland types and climates to inform their protection and urgent restoration. The review further summarises various approaches used for monitoring peatland conditions and functions. These include monitoring at the plot scale for degree of humification and stoichiometric ratio, and proximal sensing such as gamma radiometrics and electromagnetic induction at the field to landscape scale for mapping peat thickness and identifying hotspots for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Remote sensing techniques with passive and active sensors at regional to national scale can help in monitoring subsidence rate, water table, peat moisture, landslides, and GHG emissions. Although the use of water table depth as a proxy for interannual GHG emissions from peatlands has been well established, there is no single remote sensing method or data product yet that has been verified beyond local or regional scales. Broader land-use change and fire monitoring at a global scale may further assist national GHG inventory reporting. Monitoring of peatland conditions to evaluate the success of individual restoration schemes still requires field work to assess local proxies combined with remote sensing and modeling. Long-term monitoring is necessary to draw valid conclusions on revegetation outcomes and associated GHG emissions in rewetted peatlands, as their dynamics are not fully understood at the site level. Monitoring vegetation development and hydrology of restored peatlands is needed as a proxy to assess the return of water and changes in nutrient cycling and biodiversity. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace135828 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1358282025-10-26T12:50:57Z Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale Minasny, B. Adetsu, D.V. Aitkenhead, M. Artz, R.R.E. Baggaley, N. Barthelmes, A. Beucher, A. Caron, J. Conchedda, Giulia Connolly, J. Deragon, R. Evans, C. Fadnes, K. Fiantis, D. Gagkas, Z. Gilet, L. Gimona, A. Glatzel, S. Greve, M.H. Habib, W. Hergoualc'h, Kristell Hermansen, C. Kidd, D.B. Koganti, T. Kopansky, D. Large, D.J. Larmola, T. Lilly, A. Liu, H. Marcus, M. Middleton, M. Morrison, K. Petersen, R.J. Quaife, T. Rochefort, L. Rudiyanto Toca, L. Tubiello, F.N. Weber, P.L. Weldon, S. Widyatmanti, W. Williamson, J. Zak, D. peatlands mapping monitoring Peatlands cover only 3–4% of the Earth’s surface, but they store nearly 30% of global soil carbon stock. This significant carbon store is under threat as peatlands continue to be degraded at alarming rates around the world. It has prompted countries worldwide to establish regulations to conserve and reduce emissions from this carbon rich ecosystem. For example, the EU has implemented new rules that mandate sustainable management of peatlands, critical to reaching the goal of carbon neutrality by 2050. However, a lack of information on the extent and condition of peatlands has hindered the development of national policies and restoration efforts. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge on mapping and monitoring peatlands from field sites to the globe and identifies areas where further research is needed. It presents an overview of the different methodologies used to map peatlands in nine countries, which vary in definition of peat soil and peatland, mapping coverage, and mapping detail. Whereas mapping peatlands across the world with only one approach is hardly possible, the paper highlights the need for more consistent approaches within regions having comparable peatland types and climates to inform their protection and urgent restoration. The review further summarises various approaches used for monitoring peatland conditions and functions. These include monitoring at the plot scale for degree of humification and stoichiometric ratio, and proximal sensing such as gamma radiometrics and electromagnetic induction at the field to landscape scale for mapping peat thickness and identifying hotspots for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Remote sensing techniques with passive and active sensors at regional to national scale can help in monitoring subsidence rate, water table, peat moisture, landslides, and GHG emissions. Although the use of water table depth as a proxy for interannual GHG emissions from peatlands has been well established, there is no single remote sensing method or data product yet that has been verified beyond local or regional scales. Broader land-use change and fire monitoring at a global scale may further assist national GHG inventory reporting. Monitoring of peatland conditions to evaluate the success of individual restoration schemes still requires field work to assess local proxies combined with remote sensing and modeling. Long-term monitoring is necessary to draw valid conclusions on revegetation outcomes and associated GHG emissions in rewetted peatlands, as their dynamics are not fully understood at the site level. Monitoring vegetation development and hydrology of restored peatlands is needed as a proxy to assess the return of water and changes in nutrient cycling and biodiversity. 2023-10 2023-12-22T08:35:49Z 2023-12-22T08:35:49Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/135828 en Open Access Springer Minasny, B., Adetsu, D.V., Aitkenhead, M., Artz, R.R.E., Baggaley, N., Barthelmes, A., Beucher, A., Caron, J., Conchedda, G., Connolly, J., Deragon, R., Evans, C., Fadnes, K., Fiantis, D., Gagkas, Z., Gilet, L., Gimona, A., Glatzel, S., Greve, M.H., Habib, W., Hergoualc’h, K., Hermansen, C., Kidd, D.B., Koganti, T., Kopansky, D., Large, D.J., Larmola, T., Lilly, A., Liu, H., Marcus, M., Middleton, M., Morrison, K., Petersen, R.J., Quaife, T., Rochefort, L., Rudiyanto, Toca, L., Tubiello, F.N., Weber, P.L., Weldon, S., Widyatmanti, W., Williamson, J. and Zak, D. 2023. Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01084-1 |
| spellingShingle | peatlands mapping monitoring Minasny, B. Adetsu, D.V. Aitkenhead, M. Artz, R.R.E. Baggaley, N. Barthelmes, A. Beucher, A. Caron, J. Conchedda, Giulia Connolly, J. Deragon, R. Evans, C. Fadnes, K. Fiantis, D. Gagkas, Z. Gilet, L. Gimona, A. Glatzel, S. Greve, M.H. Habib, W. Hergoualc'h, Kristell Hermansen, C. Kidd, D.B. Koganti, T. Kopansky, D. Large, D.J. Larmola, T. Lilly, A. Liu, H. Marcus, M. Middleton, M. Morrison, K. Petersen, R.J. Quaife, T. Rochefort, L. Rudiyanto Toca, L. Tubiello, F.N. Weber, P.L. Weldon, S. Widyatmanti, W. Williamson, J. Zak, D. Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale |
| title | Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale |
| title_full | Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale |
| title_fullStr | Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale |
| title_short | Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale |
| title_sort | mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale |
| topic | peatlands mapping monitoring |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/135828 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT minasnyb mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT adetsudv mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT aitkenheadm mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT artzrre mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT baggaleyn mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT barthelmesa mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT beuchera mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT caronj mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT concheddagiulia mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT connollyj mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT deragonr mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT evansc mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT fadnesk mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT fiantisd mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT gagkasz mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT giletl mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT gimonaa mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT glatzels mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT grevemh mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT habibw mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT hergoualchkristell mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT hermansenc mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT kidddb mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT kogantit mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT kopanskyd mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT largedj mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT larmolat mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT lillya mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT liuh mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT marcusm mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT middletonm mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT morrisonk mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT petersenrj mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT quaifet mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT rochefortl mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT rudiyanto mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT tocal mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT tubiellofn mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT weberpl mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT weldons mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT widyatmantiw mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT williamsonj mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale AT zakd mappingandmonitoringpeatlandconditionsfromglobaltofieldscale |