AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments

This paper reports an evaluation of eleven oat genotypes in four environments for two consecutive years to identify high-biomass-yielding, stable, and broadly adapted genotypes in selected parts of Ethiopia. Genotypes were planted and evaluated with a randomized complete block design, which was repe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wodebo, Kibreab, Tolemariam, Taye, Demeke, Solomon, Garedew, Weyessa, Tesfaye, Tessema, Ekule, Muluken, Gemiyu, Deribe, Bedeke, Worku, Wamatu, Jane, Mamta, Sharma
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/135045
_version_ 1855539217541627904
author Wodebo, Kibreab
Tolemariam, Taye
Demeke, Solomon
Garedew, Weyessa
Tesfaye, Tessema
Ekule, Muluken
Gemiyu, Deribe
Bedeke, Worku
Wamatu, Jane
Mamta, Sharma
author_browse Bedeke, Worku
Demeke, Solomon
Ekule, Muluken
Garedew, Weyessa
Gemiyu, Deribe
Mamta, Sharma
Tesfaye, Tessema
Tolemariam, Taye
Wamatu, Jane
Wodebo, Kibreab
author_facet Wodebo, Kibreab
Tolemariam, Taye
Demeke, Solomon
Garedew, Weyessa
Tesfaye, Tessema
Ekule, Muluken
Gemiyu, Deribe
Bedeke, Worku
Wamatu, Jane
Mamta, Sharma
author_sort Wodebo, Kibreab
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper reports an evaluation of eleven oat genotypes in four environments for two consecutive years to identify high-biomass-yielding, stable, and broadly adapted genotypes in selected parts of Ethiopia. Genotypes were planted and evaluated with a randomized complete block design, which was repeated three times. The additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of variances revealed that the environment, genotype, and genotype–environment interaction had a significant (p ≤ 0.001) influence on the biomass yield in the dry matter base (t ha−1). The interaction of the first and second principal component analysis accounted for 73.43% and 14.97% of the genotype according to the environment interaction sum of squares, respectively. G6 and G5 were the most stable and widely adapted genotypes and were selected as superior genotypes. The genotype-by-environment interaction showed a 49.46% contribution to the total treatment of sum-of-squares variation, while genotype and environment effects explained 34.94% and 15.60%, respectively. The highest mean yield was obtained from G6 (12.52 kg/ha), and the lowest mean yield was obtained from G7 (8.65 kg/ha). According to the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction biplot, G6 and G5 were high-yielding genotypes, whereas G7 was a low-yielding genotype. Furthermore, according to the genotype and genotype–environment interaction biplot, G6 was the winning genotype in all environments. However, G7 was a low-yielding genotype in all environments. Finally, G6 was an ideal genotype with a higher mean yield and relatively good stability. However, G7 was a poor-yielding and unstable genotype. The genotype, environment, and genotype x environment interaction had extremely important effects on the biomass yield of oats. The findings of the graphic stability methods (additive main effect and multiplicative interaction and the genotype and genotype–environment interaction) for identifying high-yielding and stable oat genotypes were very similar.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace135045
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
publisherStr Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1350452026-01-26T14:15:41Z AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments Wodebo, Kibreab Tolemariam, Taye Demeke, Solomon Garedew, Weyessa Tesfaye, Tessema Ekule, Muluken Gemiyu, Deribe Bedeke, Worku Wamatu, Jane Mamta, Sharma ammi forage gge gxe interaction biomass yield oat (avena sativa l.) This paper reports an evaluation of eleven oat genotypes in four environments for two consecutive years to identify high-biomass-yielding, stable, and broadly adapted genotypes in selected parts of Ethiopia. Genotypes were planted and evaluated with a randomized complete block design, which was repeated three times. The additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of variances revealed that the environment, genotype, and genotype–environment interaction had a significant (p ≤ 0.001) influence on the biomass yield in the dry matter base (t ha−1). The interaction of the first and second principal component analysis accounted for 73.43% and 14.97% of the genotype according to the environment interaction sum of squares, respectively. G6 and G5 were the most stable and widely adapted genotypes and were selected as superior genotypes. The genotype-by-environment interaction showed a 49.46% contribution to the total treatment of sum-of-squares variation, while genotype and environment effects explained 34.94% and 15.60%, respectively. The highest mean yield was obtained from G6 (12.52 kg/ha), and the lowest mean yield was obtained from G7 (8.65 kg/ha). According to the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction biplot, G6 and G5 were high-yielding genotypes, whereas G7 was a low-yielding genotype. Furthermore, according to the genotype and genotype–environment interaction biplot, G6 was the winning genotype in all environments. However, G7 was a low-yielding genotype in all environments. Finally, G6 was an ideal genotype with a higher mean yield and relatively good stability. However, G7 was a poor-yielding and unstable genotype. The genotype, environment, and genotype x environment interaction had extremely important effects on the biomass yield of oats. The findings of the graphic stability methods (additive main effect and multiplicative interaction and the genotype and genotype–environment interaction) for identifying high-yielding and stable oat genotypes were very similar. 2023-08-25 2023-12-05T16:47:00Z 2023-12-05T16:47:00Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/135045 en Open Access application/pdf Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) Kibreab Wodebo, Taye Tolemariam, Solomon Demeke, Weyessa Garedew, Tessema Tesfaye, Muluken Ekule, Deribe Gemiyu, Worku Bedeke, Jane Wamatu, Sharma Mamta. (25/8/2023). AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L. ) Genotypes for Multiple Environments. Plants, 12 (17).
spellingShingle ammi
forage
gge
gxe interaction
biomass yield
oat (avena sativa l.)
Wodebo, Kibreab
Tolemariam, Taye
Demeke, Solomon
Garedew, Weyessa
Tesfaye, Tessema
Ekule, Muluken
Gemiyu, Deribe
Bedeke, Worku
Wamatu, Jane
Mamta, Sharma
AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments
title AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments
title_full AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments
title_fullStr AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments
title_full_unstemmed AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments
title_short AMMI and GGE Biplot Analyses for Mega-Environment Identification and Selection of Some High-Yielding Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Multiple Environments
title_sort ammi and gge biplot analyses for mega environment identification and selection of some high yielding oat avena sativa l genotypes for multiple environments
topic ammi
forage
gge
gxe interaction
biomass yield
oat (avena sativa l.)
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/135045
work_keys_str_mv AT wodebokibreab ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT tolemariamtaye ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT demekesolomon ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT garedewweyessa ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT tesfayetessema ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT ekulemuluken ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT gemiyuderibe ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT bedekeworku ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT wamatujane ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments
AT mamtasharma ammiandggebiplotanalysesformegaenvironmentidentificationandselectionofsomehighyieldingoatavenasativalgenotypesformultipleenvironments