Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review

This scoping review identifies and describes the methods used to prioritize diseases for resource allocation across disease control, surveillance, and research and the methods used generally in decision-making on animal health policy. Three electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, Embase, and CAB Abstr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amenu, Kebede, McIntyre, K.M., Moje, N., Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D., Rushton, J., Grace, Delia
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Frontiers Media 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/132162
_version_ 1855531938831400960
author Amenu, Kebede
McIntyre, K.M.
Moje, N.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
Rushton, J.
Grace, Delia
author_browse Amenu, Kebede
Grace, Delia
Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
McIntyre, K.M.
Moje, N.
Rushton, J.
author_facet Amenu, Kebede
McIntyre, K.M.
Moje, N.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
Rushton, J.
Grace, Delia
author_sort Amenu, Kebede
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This scoping review identifies and describes the methods used to prioritize diseases for resource allocation across disease control, surveillance, and research and the methods used generally in decision-making on animal health policy. Three electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, Embase, and CAB Abstracts) were searched for articles from 2000 to 2021. Searches identified 6, 395 articles after de-duplication, with an additional 64 articles added manually. A total of 6, 460 articles were imported to online document review management software (sysrev.com) for screening. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 532 articles passed the first screening, and after a second round of screening, 336 articles were recommended for full review. A total of 40 articles were removed after data extraction. Another 11 articles were added, having been obtained from cross-citations of already identified articles, providing a total of 307 articles to be considered in the scoping review. The results show that the main methods used for disease prioritization were based on economic analysis, multi-criteria evaluation, risk assessment, simple ranking, spatial risk mapping, and simulation modeling. Disease prioritization was performed to aid in decision-making related to various categories: (1) disease control, prevention, or eradication strategies, (2) general organizational strategy, (3) identification of high-risk areas or populations, (4) assessment of risk of disease introduction or occurrence, (5) disease surveillance, and (6) research priority setting. Of the articles included in data extraction, 50.5% had a national focus, 12.3% were local, 11.9% were regional, 6.5% were sub-national, and 3.9% were global. In 15.2% of the articles, the geographic focus was not specified. The scoping review revealed the lack of comprehensive, integrated, and mutually compatible approaches to disease prioritization and decision support tools for animal health. We recommend that future studies should focus on creating comprehensive and harmonized frameworks describing methods for disease prioritization and decision-making tools in animal health.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace132162
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Frontiers Media
publisherStr Frontiers Media
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1321622025-12-08T10:29:22Z Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review Amenu, Kebede McIntyre, K.M. Moje, N. Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D. Rushton, J. Grace, Delia animal health animal diseases disease control This scoping review identifies and describes the methods used to prioritize diseases for resource allocation across disease control, surveillance, and research and the methods used generally in decision-making on animal health policy. Three electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, Embase, and CAB Abstracts) were searched for articles from 2000 to 2021. Searches identified 6, 395 articles after de-duplication, with an additional 64 articles added manually. A total of 6, 460 articles were imported to online document review management software (sysrev.com) for screening. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 532 articles passed the first screening, and after a second round of screening, 336 articles were recommended for full review. A total of 40 articles were removed after data extraction. Another 11 articles were added, having been obtained from cross-citations of already identified articles, providing a total of 307 articles to be considered in the scoping review. The results show that the main methods used for disease prioritization were based on economic analysis, multi-criteria evaluation, risk assessment, simple ranking, spatial risk mapping, and simulation modeling. Disease prioritization was performed to aid in decision-making related to various categories: (1) disease control, prevention, or eradication strategies, (2) general organizational strategy, (3) identification of high-risk areas or populations, (4) assessment of risk of disease introduction or occurrence, (5) disease surveillance, and (6) research priority setting. Of the articles included in data extraction, 50.5% had a national focus, 12.3% were local, 11.9% were regional, 6.5% were sub-national, and 3.9% were global. In 15.2% of the articles, the geographic focus was not specified. The scoping review revealed the lack of comprehensive, integrated, and mutually compatible approaches to disease prioritization and decision support tools for animal health. We recommend that future studies should focus on creating comprehensive and harmonized frameworks describing methods for disease prioritization and decision-making tools in animal health. 2023-10-06 2023-10-06T13:28:12Z 2023-10-06T13:28:12Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/132162 en Open Access Frontiers Media Amenu, K., McIntyre, K.M., Moje, N., Knight-Jones, T., Rushton, J. and Grace, D. 2023. Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10: 1231711.
spellingShingle animal health
animal diseases
disease control
Amenu, Kebede
McIntyre, K.M.
Moje, N.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
Rushton, J.
Grace, Delia
Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review
title Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review
title_full Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review
title_fullStr Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review
title_short Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000–2021: a structured scoping review
title_sort approaches for disease prioritization and decision making in animal health 2000 2021 a structured scoping review
topic animal health
animal diseases
disease control
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/132162
work_keys_str_mv AT amenukebede approachesfordiseaseprioritizationanddecisionmakinginanimalhealth20002021astructuredscopingreview
AT mcintyrekm approachesfordiseaseprioritizationanddecisionmakinginanimalhealth20002021astructuredscopingreview
AT mojen approachesfordiseaseprioritizationanddecisionmakinginanimalhealth20002021astructuredscopingreview
AT knightjonestheodorejd approachesfordiseaseprioritizationanddecisionmakinginanimalhealth20002021astructuredscopingreview
AT rushtonj approachesfordiseaseprioritizationanddecisionmakinginanimalhealth20002021astructuredscopingreview
AT gracedelia approachesfordiseaseprioritizationanddecisionmakinginanimalhealth20002021astructuredscopingreview