Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions

What shapes mass attitudes towards constitutional reforms in post-conflict contexts? Constitutional reform has long been a priority for states emerging from conflict, where there is a need to rectify the marginalization of certain groups, define the scopes of authority of different institutions, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyle, Jordan, Resnick, Danielle
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131468
_version_ 1855520260649648128
author Kyle, Jordan
Resnick, Danielle
author_browse Kyle, Jordan
Resnick, Danielle
author_facet Kyle, Jordan
Resnick, Danielle
author_sort Kyle, Jordan
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description What shapes mass attitudes towards constitutional reforms in post-conflict contexts? Constitutional reform has long been a priority for states emerging from conflict, where there is a need to rectify the marginalization of certain groups, define the scopes of authority of different institutions, and delineate power-sharing arrangements. Yet, because constitutional reforms are often led by political elites, we typically lack insights into the views of the broader populace.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace131468
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1314682024-11-07T09:42:24Z Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions Kyle, Jordan Resnick, Danielle constitution conflict ethnic groups authorities reforms class conflict behaviour risk What shapes mass attitudes towards constitutional reforms in post-conflict contexts? Constitutional reform has long been a priority for states emerging from conflict, where there is a need to rectify the marginalization of certain groups, define the scopes of authority of different institutions, and delineate power-sharing arrangements. Yet, because constitutional reforms are often led by political elites, we typically lack insights into the views of the broader populace. 2023-06-16 2023-08-08T09:33:07Z 2023-08-08T09:33:07Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131468 en https://www.brookings.edu/articles/building-popular-support-for-post-conflict-constitutions-lessons-from-nepal/ Open Access Kyle, Jordan; and Resnick, Danielle. 2023. Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions. Brookings Institute Working Paper June 2023. Washington, DC: Brookings Insitution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sure-bets-or-risky-gambles-understanding-popular-support-for-post-conflict-constitutions/
spellingShingle constitution
conflict
ethnic groups
authorities
reforms
class conflict
behaviour
risk
Kyle, Jordan
Resnick, Danielle
Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions
title Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions
title_full Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions
title_fullStr Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions
title_full_unstemmed Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions
title_short Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions
title_sort sure bets or risky gambles understanding popular support for post conflict constitutions
topic constitution
conflict
ethnic groups
authorities
reforms
class conflict
behaviour
risk
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131468
work_keys_str_mv AT kylejordan surebetsorriskygamblesunderstandingpopularsupportforpostconflictconstitutions
AT resnickdanielle surebetsorriskygamblesunderstandingpopularsupportforpostconflictconstitutions