Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods

A lack of water quality information for many water bodies around the world makes it difficult to identify global change and discover early signs of myriad threats to freshwater resources. This problem is widely seen in Ethiopia due to absence of regular monitoring. Citizen science has a great potent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babiso, W. Z., Ayano, K. K., Haile, Alemseged Tamiru, Keche, D. D., Acharya, K., Werner, D.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131355
_version_ 1855520600300191744
author Babiso, W. Z.
Ayano, K. K.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Keche, D. D.
Acharya, K.
Werner, D.
author_browse Acharya, K.
Ayano, K. K.
Babiso, W. Z.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Keche, D. D.
Werner, D.
author_facet Babiso, W. Z.
Ayano, K. K.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Keche, D. D.
Acharya, K.
Werner, D.
author_sort Babiso, W. Z.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description A lack of water quality information for many water bodies around the world makes it difficult to identify global change and discover early signs of myriad threats to freshwater resources. This problem is widely seen in Ethiopia due to absence of regular monitoring. Citizen science has a great potential to fill these gaps in water quality data, but there is concern about the accuracy of data collected by citizen scientists. Moreover, there is a gap to engage citizen scientists in water quality monitoring, and there is still insufficient awareness of how citizen scientists can become part of a collaborative scheme. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of water quality collected by citizen scientists and characterize the water quality of the Meki River with the involvement of citizen scientists. The suitability of the river water for irrigation was evaluated using a combination of citizen science and conventional water quality data collection methods. Water temperature, turbidity, ammonia, phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, total alkalinity, total hardness, and pH were analyzed by both citizen scientists and in a conventional laboratory. The citizen scientists’ data, expressed as percent of synthetic standard solution concentrations, indicated good agreement for selected water quality parameters: 123.8 ± 24.7% for PO4 3-, 115.6 ± 6.3% for NO3 -, 105.8 ± 7.4% for pH, and 133.3 ± 23.6% for NH4 + . Thus, citizen scientists can monitor and collect water quality data accurately. From the results, the Meki River water can be used for irrigation, but pollution sources should be controlled to reduce further quality deterioration as the population increases.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace131355
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher MDPI
publisherStr MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1313552025-12-08T10:29:22Z Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods Babiso, W. Z. Ayano, K. K. Haile, Alemseged Tamiru Keche, D. D. Acharya, K. Werner, D. water quality monitoring citizen science scientists quality assurance pollution physicochemical properties parameters rivers irrigation A lack of water quality information for many water bodies around the world makes it difficult to identify global change and discover early signs of myriad threats to freshwater resources. This problem is widely seen in Ethiopia due to absence of regular monitoring. Citizen science has a great potential to fill these gaps in water quality data, but there is concern about the accuracy of data collected by citizen scientists. Moreover, there is a gap to engage citizen scientists in water quality monitoring, and there is still insufficient awareness of how citizen scientists can become part of a collaborative scheme. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of water quality collected by citizen scientists and characterize the water quality of the Meki River with the involvement of citizen scientists. The suitability of the river water for irrigation was evaluated using a combination of citizen science and conventional water quality data collection methods. Water temperature, turbidity, ammonia, phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, total alkalinity, total hardness, and pH were analyzed by both citizen scientists and in a conventional laboratory. The citizen scientists’ data, expressed as percent of synthetic standard solution concentrations, indicated good agreement for selected water quality parameters: 123.8 ± 24.7% for PO4 3-, 115.6 ± 6.3% for NO3 -, 105.8 ± 7.4% for pH, and 133.3 ± 23.6% for NH4 + . Thus, citizen scientists can monitor and collect water quality data accurately. From the results, the Meki River water can be used for irrigation, but pollution sources should be controlled to reduce further quality deterioration as the population increases. 2023-01-05 2023-07-31T22:30:49Z 2023-07-31T22:30:49Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131355 en Open Access MDPI Babiso, W. Z.; Ayano, K. K.; Haile, Alemseged Tamiru; Keche, D. D.; Acharya, K.; Werner, D. 2023. Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods. Water, 15(2):238. (Special issue: Field Methods for Water Quality Surveying) [doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020238]
spellingShingle water quality
monitoring
citizen science
scientists
quality assurance
pollution
physicochemical properties
parameters
rivers
irrigation
Babiso, W. Z.
Ayano, K. K.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Keche, D. D.
Acharya, K.
Werner, D.
Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods
title Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods
title_full Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods
title_fullStr Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods
title_full_unstemmed Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods
title_short Citizen science for water quality monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods
title_sort citizen science for water quality monitoring in the meki river ethiopia quality assurance and comparison with conventional methods
topic water quality
monitoring
citizen science
scientists
quality assurance
pollution
physicochemical properties
parameters
rivers
irrigation
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131355
work_keys_str_mv AT babisowz citizenscienceforwaterqualitymonitoringinthemekiriverethiopiaqualityassuranceandcomparisonwithconventionalmethods
AT ayanokk citizenscienceforwaterqualitymonitoringinthemekiriverethiopiaqualityassuranceandcomparisonwithconventionalmethods
AT hailealemsegedtamiru citizenscienceforwaterqualitymonitoringinthemekiriverethiopiaqualityassuranceandcomparisonwithconventionalmethods
AT kechedd citizenscienceforwaterqualitymonitoringinthemekiriverethiopiaqualityassuranceandcomparisonwithconventionalmethods
AT acharyak citizenscienceforwaterqualitymonitoringinthemekiriverethiopiaqualityassuranceandcomparisonwithconventionalmethods
AT wernerd citizenscienceforwaterqualitymonitoringinthemekiriverethiopiaqualityassuranceandcomparisonwithconventionalmethods