Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis
Numerous studies claim that rewetting interventions reduce CO2 and increase CH4 fluxes. To verify the claim, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of rewetting on CO2 and CH4 fluxes and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). We identified 28 primary articles eligible for meta-an...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Springer
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131073 |
| _version_ | 1855527202718744576 |
|---|---|
| author | Darusman, T. Murdiyarso, D. Impron Anas, I. |
| author_browse | Anas, I. Darusman, T. Impron Murdiyarso, D. |
| author_facet | Darusman, T. Murdiyarso, D. Impron Anas, I. |
| author_sort | Darusman, T. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Numerous studies claim that rewetting interventions reduce CO2 and increase CH4 fluxes. To verify the claim, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of rewetting on CO2 and CH4 fluxes and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). We identified 28 primary articles eligible for meta-analysis, from which we calculated 48 effect sizes for CO2 emissions, 67 effect sizes for CH4 emissions, and 5 effect sizes for DOC. We found that rewetting significantly decreased CO2 fluxes, with temperate zones showing the highest Hedges’ g effect size (−0.798 ± 0.229), followed by tropical (−0.338 ± 0.269) and boreal (−0.209 ± 0.372) zones. Meanwhile, rewetting increased CH4 fluxes, with the highest Hedges’ g effect size shown in temperate zones (1.108 ± 0.144), followed by boreal (0.805 ± 0.183) and tropical (0.096 ± 0.284) zones. In addition, based on yearly monitoring after rewetting, the CH4 emissions effect size increased significantly over the first 4 years (r2 = 0.853). Overall, the rewetting intervention reduced CO2 emissions by −1.43 ± 0.35 Mg CO2–C ha−1 year−1, increased CH4 emissions by 0.033 ± 0.003 Mg CH4–C ha−1 year−1, and had no significant impact on DOC. To improve the precision and reduce the bias of rewetting effect size quantification, it is recommended to conduct more experimental studies with extended monitoring periods using larger sample sizes and apply the before-after control-impact study design, especially in boreal and tropical climate zones. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace131073 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1310732025-10-26T12:52:47Z Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis Darusman, T. Murdiyarso, D. Impron Anas, I. peatlands rehydration meta-analysis Numerous studies claim that rewetting interventions reduce CO2 and increase CH4 fluxes. To verify the claim, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of rewetting on CO2 and CH4 fluxes and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). We identified 28 primary articles eligible for meta-analysis, from which we calculated 48 effect sizes for CO2 emissions, 67 effect sizes for CH4 emissions, and 5 effect sizes for DOC. We found that rewetting significantly decreased CO2 fluxes, with temperate zones showing the highest Hedges’ g effect size (−0.798 ± 0.229), followed by tropical (−0.338 ± 0.269) and boreal (−0.209 ± 0.372) zones. Meanwhile, rewetting increased CH4 fluxes, with the highest Hedges’ g effect size shown in temperate zones (1.108 ± 0.144), followed by boreal (0.805 ± 0.183) and tropical (0.096 ± 0.284) zones. In addition, based on yearly monitoring after rewetting, the CH4 emissions effect size increased significantly over the first 4 years (r2 = 0.853). Overall, the rewetting intervention reduced CO2 emissions by −1.43 ± 0.35 Mg CO2–C ha−1 year−1, increased CH4 emissions by 0.033 ± 0.003 Mg CH4–C ha−1 year−1, and had no significant impact on DOC. To improve the precision and reduce the bias of rewetting effect size quantification, it is recommended to conduct more experimental studies with extended monitoring periods using larger sample sizes and apply the before-after control-impact study design, especially in boreal and tropical climate zones. 2023-03 2023-07-11T08:05:09Z 2023-07-11T08:05:09Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131073 en Open Access Springer Darusman, T., Murdiyarso, D., Impron, & Anas, I. (2023). Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis. Mitigation And Adaptation Strategies For Global Change, 28(3). doi: 10.1007/s11027-023-10046-9 |
| spellingShingle | peatlands rehydration meta-analysis Darusman, T. Murdiyarso, D. Impron Anas, I. Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis |
| title | Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis |
| title_full | Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis |
| title_short | Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis |
| title_sort | effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes a meta analysis |
| topic | peatlands rehydration meta-analysis |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131073 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT darusmant effectofrewettingdegradedpeatlandsoncarbonfluxesametaanalysis AT murdiyarsod effectofrewettingdegradedpeatlandsoncarbonfluxesametaanalysis AT impron effectofrewettingdegradedpeatlandsoncarbonfluxesametaanalysis AT anasi effectofrewettingdegradedpeatlandsoncarbonfluxesametaanalysis |