Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria

One of the most serious challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in Nigeria is land degradation. Although this issue has received little attention, soil and water conservation practices have been identified as a possible pathway out of the potential problems posed by land degradation. Ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogunniyi, A.I., Omotayo, A.O., Olagunju, K.O., Motunrayo, O., Awotide, B.A., Mavrotas, G., Aremu, A.O.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130761
_version_ 1855531587255402496
author Ogunniyi, A.I.
Omotayo, A.O.
Olagunju, K.O.
Motunrayo, O.
Awotide, B.A.
Mavrotas, G.
Aremu, A.O.
author_browse Aremu, A.O.
Awotide, B.A.
Mavrotas, G.
Motunrayo, O.
Ogunniyi, A.I.
Olagunju, K.O.
Omotayo, A.O.
author_facet Ogunniyi, A.I.
Omotayo, A.O.
Olagunju, K.O.
Motunrayo, O.
Awotide, B.A.
Mavrotas, G.
Aremu, A.O.
author_sort Ogunniyi, A.I.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description One of the most serious challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in Nigeria is land degradation. Although this issue has received little attention, soil and water conservation practices have been identified as a possible pathway out of the potential problems posed by land degradation. Therefore, the central research question that this paper tries to address is the following: Do adoption of soil and water conservation (SWC) practices affect crop productivity and household welfare? This paper uses data collected by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) from maize farmers in rural Nigeria. We usedemploy the propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability weighting adjusted regression model (IPWRA) approach, and the linear regression with endogenous treatment effect (LRETE) model to incorporate the typologies of SWC practices, and tested how the model affects crop productivity and household welfare. Additionally, multinomial logit was used to estimate the factors influencing the decision to adopt single and multiple SWC practices. The estimates show that education, age of the household head, access to credit, experience of drought, soil fertility, and occupational stress contribute to the decision to adopt SWC practices. The casual effect estimates reveal that both single and multiple adoptions of SWC practices had a positive and significant relationship with the crop productivity and welfare of the adopters. The results show that the adoption of combined SWC practices has a higher impact on crop productivity and welfare than single SWC practices. For instance, the adoption of a combination of three SWC practices was found to increase crop productivity and household welfare by 27.55% and 38.23%, respectively versus 13.91% and 15.11% in the case of single SWC practices. The study suggests that profile-raising agenda and efforts that focus on promoting the adoption of combination of SWC practices should be designed and implemented to enhance crop productivity and hence the welfare of the maize farming households in rural Nigeria.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace130761
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1307612024-10-25T07:59:38Z Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria Ogunniyi, A.I. Omotayo, A.O. Olagunju, K.O. Motunrayo, O. Awotide, B.A. Mavrotas, G. Aremu, A.O. agriculture sustainability soil conservation water conservation crop production rural communities households nigeria One of the most serious challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in Nigeria is land degradation. Although this issue has received little attention, soil and water conservation practices have been identified as a possible pathway out of the potential problems posed by land degradation. Therefore, the central research question that this paper tries to address is the following: Do adoption of soil and water conservation (SWC) practices affect crop productivity and household welfare? This paper uses data collected by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) from maize farmers in rural Nigeria. We usedemploy the propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability weighting adjusted regression model (IPWRA) approach, and the linear regression with endogenous treatment effect (LRETE) model to incorporate the typologies of SWC practices, and tested how the model affects crop productivity and household welfare. Additionally, multinomial logit was used to estimate the factors influencing the decision to adopt single and multiple SWC practices. The estimates show that education, age of the household head, access to credit, experience of drought, soil fertility, and occupational stress contribute to the decision to adopt SWC practices. The casual effect estimates reveal that both single and multiple adoptions of SWC practices had a positive and significant relationship with the crop productivity and welfare of the adopters. The results show that the adoption of combined SWC practices has a higher impact on crop productivity and welfare than single SWC practices. For instance, the adoption of a combination of three SWC practices was found to increase crop productivity and household welfare by 27.55% and 38.23%, respectively versus 13.91% and 15.11% in the case of single SWC practices. The study suggests that profile-raising agenda and efforts that focus on promoting the adoption of combination of SWC practices should be designed and implemented to enhance crop productivity and hence the welfare of the maize farming households in rural Nigeria. 2023 2023-06-20T10:04:25Z 2023-06-20T10:04:25Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130761 en Limited Access Springer Ogunniyi, A.I., Omotayo, A.O., Olagunju, K.O., Motunrayo, O., Awotide, B.A., Mavrotas, G. & Aremu, A.O. (2023). Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(19), 56016-56036.
spellingShingle agriculture
sustainability
soil conservation
water conservation
crop production
rural communities
households
nigeria
Ogunniyi, A.I.
Omotayo, A.O.
Olagunju, K.O.
Motunrayo, O.
Awotide, B.A.
Mavrotas, G.
Aremu, A.O.
Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria
title Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria
title_full Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria
title_fullStr Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria
title_short Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria
title_sort do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare evidence from rural nigeria
topic agriculture
sustainability
soil conservation
water conservation
crop production
rural communities
households
nigeria
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130761
work_keys_str_mv AT ogunniyiai dosoilandwaterconservationpracticesinfluencecropproductivityandhouseholdwelfareevidencefromruralnigeria
AT omotayoao dosoilandwaterconservationpracticesinfluencecropproductivityandhouseholdwelfareevidencefromruralnigeria
AT olagunjuko dosoilandwaterconservationpracticesinfluencecropproductivityandhouseholdwelfareevidencefromruralnigeria
AT motunrayoo dosoilandwaterconservationpracticesinfluencecropproductivityandhouseholdwelfareevidencefromruralnigeria
AT awotideba dosoilandwaterconservationpracticesinfluencecropproductivityandhouseholdwelfareevidencefromruralnigeria
AT mavrotasg dosoilandwaterconservationpracticesinfluencecropproductivityandhouseholdwelfareevidencefromruralnigeria
AT aremuao dosoilandwaterconservationpracticesinfluencecropproductivityandhouseholdwelfareevidencefromruralnigeria