Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees
In 2015–16, 21 million small and medium enterprises engaged in the business of manufacturing, trading, retailing, and serving food linked India's 146 million farmers to its nearly 1.3 billion consumers. These food enterprises employed 25 million men and 10 million women and had an annual turnover of...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130171 |
| _version_ | 1855524250750812160 |
|---|---|
| author | Gupta, Manavi Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Saroj, Sunil |
| author_browse | Gupta, Manavi Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Saroj, Sunil |
| author_facet | Gupta, Manavi Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Saroj, Sunil |
| author_sort | Gupta, Manavi |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | In 2015–16, 21 million small and medium enterprises engaged in the business of manufacturing, trading, retailing, and serving food linked India's 146 million farmers to its nearly 1.3 billion consumers. These food enterprises employed 25 million men and 10 million women and had an annual turnover of $ 227 billion. Between 2010–11 and 2015–16, the gross value added (GVA) by the post-farmgate food businesses (PFFBs) increased by $16.3 billion (from $ 22.9 billion to $ 39.2 billion) which is comparable to the growth of $19.5 billion in the GVA by the primary food production (or the farm) sector which is nearly 10 times larger in size. Despite their growing contribution to the overall food economy, PFFBs are ignored in research and policy discussions on food systems. This paper tries to fill this gap by using two large nationally representative datasets from India—the Enterprise Survey and the Periodic Labor Force Survey (PLFS)—to assess the key characteristics of PFFBs and the entrepreneurs and employees who work in them. We show that despite rapid economic growth in the country, micro-enterprises with less than 5 employees continue to dominate India's food economy. Most of these firms are informal, rely purely on spot exchanges with their sellers and buyers, and do not borrow money from formal financial institutions. We find a strong positive association between the formal status and the productivity and profitability of PFFBs. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace130171 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1301712025-10-26T13:01:39Z Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees Gupta, Manavi Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Saroj, Sunil food systems enterprises entrepreneurs In 2015–16, 21 million small and medium enterprises engaged in the business of manufacturing, trading, retailing, and serving food linked India's 146 million farmers to its nearly 1.3 billion consumers. These food enterprises employed 25 million men and 10 million women and had an annual turnover of $ 227 billion. Between 2010–11 and 2015–16, the gross value added (GVA) by the post-farmgate food businesses (PFFBs) increased by $16.3 billion (from $ 22.9 billion to $ 39.2 billion) which is comparable to the growth of $19.5 billion in the GVA by the primary food production (or the farm) sector which is nearly 10 times larger in size. Despite their growing contribution to the overall food economy, PFFBs are ignored in research and policy discussions on food systems. This paper tries to fill this gap by using two large nationally representative datasets from India—the Enterprise Survey and the Periodic Labor Force Survey (PLFS)—to assess the key characteristics of PFFBs and the entrepreneurs and employees who work in them. We show that despite rapid economic growth in the country, micro-enterprises with less than 5 employees continue to dominate India's food economy. Most of these firms are informal, rely purely on spot exchanges with their sellers and buyers, and do not borrow money from formal financial institutions. We find a strong positive association between the formal status and the productivity and profitability of PFFBs. 2023-03 2023-04-27T22:40:09Z 2023-04-27T22:40:09Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130171 en Limited Access Elsevier Gupta, M., Kishore, A., Roy, D., & Saroj, S. (2023). Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees. Global Food Security, 36, 100665. |
| spellingShingle | food systems enterprises entrepreneurs Gupta, Manavi Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Saroj, Sunil Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees |
| title | Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees |
| title_full | Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees |
| title_fullStr | Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees |
| title_full_unstemmed | Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees |
| title_short | Post-farmgate food businesses of India: The enterprises, the entrepreneurs, and the employees |
| title_sort | post farmgate food businesses of india the enterprises the entrepreneurs and the employees |
| topic | food systems enterprises entrepreneurs |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130171 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT guptamanavi postfarmgatefoodbusinessesofindiatheenterprisestheentrepreneursandtheemployees AT kishoreavinash postfarmgatefoodbusinessesofindiatheenterprisestheentrepreneursandtheemployees AT roydevesh postfarmgatefoodbusinessesofindiatheenterprisestheentrepreneursandtheemployees AT sarojsunil postfarmgatefoodbusinessesofindiatheenterprisestheentrepreneursandtheemployees |