The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis
The potato cyst nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, is a major potato pest throughout the world. Despite the environmental concerns associated with the use of chemical nematicides, they remain essential for integrated management programs, especially when resistant varieties are lacking. This study in...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Organization of Nematologists of Tropical America
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129100 |
| _version_ | 1855517996570640384 |
|---|---|
| author | Saleh, Azzam Altas, A. Evlice, Emre Özer, Göksel Imren, Mustafa Dababat, Abdelfattah A. |
| author_browse | Altas, A. Dababat, Abdelfattah A. Evlice, Emre Imren, Mustafa Saleh, Azzam Özer, Göksel |
| author_facet | Saleh, Azzam Altas, A. Evlice, Emre Özer, Göksel Imren, Mustafa Dababat, Abdelfattah A. |
| author_sort | Saleh, Azzam |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The potato cyst nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, is a major potato pest throughout the world. Despite the environmental concerns associated with the use of chemical nematicides, they remain essential for integrated management programs, especially when resistant varieties are lacking. This study investigated fosthiazate efficacy to control G. rostochiensis in potato in comparison to fluopyram and the biological control agent Paecilomyces lilacinus strain PL1. Two independent trials were carried out at fields in Ödemiş and Bozdağ Districts, İzmir Province, Turkey. All treatments reduced densities of G. rostochiensis in roots and soil compared to the non-treated controls. All pesticides consistently decreased the reproduction factor (Rf = final population density/initial population density) values of G. rostochiensis compared to the non-treated controls in Ödemiş and Bozdağ. However, fosthiazate and fluopyram were more effective than the biological agent. Fosthiazate, fluopyram, and P. lilacinus strain PL1 applications increased potato yields in Ödemiş and Bozdağ by 21-34% and 20-31%, respectively, compared to the control. In conclusion, the application of fosthiazate and fluopyram provided a higher level of protection against G. rostochiensis and should be considered an alternative and integrative option in nematode management programs. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace129100 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Organization of Nematologists of Tropical America |
| publisherStr | Organization of Nematologists of Tropical America |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1291002025-12-08T09:54:28Z The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis Saleh, Azzam Altas, A. Evlice, Emre Özer, Göksel Imren, Mustafa Dababat, Abdelfattah A. globodera rostochiensis management nematicides potatoes resistance varieties The potato cyst nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, is a major potato pest throughout the world. Despite the environmental concerns associated with the use of chemical nematicides, they remain essential for integrated management programs, especially when resistant varieties are lacking. This study investigated fosthiazate efficacy to control G. rostochiensis in potato in comparison to fluopyram and the biological control agent Paecilomyces lilacinus strain PL1. Two independent trials were carried out at fields in Ödemiş and Bozdağ Districts, İzmir Province, Turkey. All treatments reduced densities of G. rostochiensis in roots and soil compared to the non-treated controls. All pesticides consistently decreased the reproduction factor (Rf = final population density/initial population density) values of G. rostochiensis compared to the non-treated controls in Ödemiş and Bozdağ. However, fosthiazate and fluopyram were more effective than the biological agent. Fosthiazate, fluopyram, and P. lilacinus strain PL1 applications increased potato yields in Ödemiş and Bozdağ by 21-34% and 20-31%, respectively, compared to the control. In conclusion, the application of fosthiazate and fluopyram provided a higher level of protection against G. rostochiensis and should be considered an alternative and integrative option in nematode management programs. 2022 2023-02-28T09:00:26Z 2023-02-28T09:00:26Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129100 en Open Access application/pdf Organization of Nematologists of Tropical America Saleh, A., Altaş, A., Evlice, E., Özer, G., Imren, M. and Dababat, A. 2022. The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis. Nematropica 52(1). |
| spellingShingle | globodera rostochiensis management nematicides potatoes resistance varieties Saleh, Azzam Altas, A. Evlice, Emre Özer, Göksel Imren, Mustafa Dababat, Abdelfattah A. The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis |
| title | The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis |
| title_full | The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis |
| title_fullStr | The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis |
| title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis |
| title_short | The efficacy of fosthiazate, fluopyram, and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis |
| title_sort | efficacy of fosthiazate fluopyram and paecilomyces lilacinus against field population of globodera rostochiensis |
| topic | globodera rostochiensis management nematicides potatoes resistance varieties |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129100 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT salehazzam theefficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT altasa theefficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT evliceemre theefficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT ozergoksel theefficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT imrenmustafa theefficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT dababatabdelfattaha theefficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT salehazzam efficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT altasa efficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT evliceemre efficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT ozergoksel efficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT imrenmustafa efficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis AT dababatabdelfattaha efficacyoffosthiazatefluopyramandpaecilomyceslilacinusagainstfieldpopulationofgloboderarostochiensis |