Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya
Climate adaptation interventions, such as programs promoting climate-smart agricultural innovations, are proving effective in increasing farmer resilience as well as food and nutrition security (Mizik, 2021; Thornton et al., 2022). However, there is often little understanding of the potential positi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Informe técnico |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
CGIAR FOCUS Climate Security
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/128019 |
| _version_ | 1855513701989220352 |
|---|---|
| author | Sarzana, Carolina Melgar, Adriana Meddings, George Läderach, Peter R.D. Pacillo, Grazia |
| author_browse | Läderach, Peter R.D. Meddings, George Melgar, Adriana Pacillo, Grazia Sarzana, Carolina |
| author_facet | Sarzana, Carolina Melgar, Adriana Meddings, George Läderach, Peter R.D. Pacillo, Grazia |
| author_sort | Sarzana, Carolina |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Climate adaptation interventions, such as programs promoting climate-smart agricultural innovations, are proving effective in increasing farmer resilience as well as food and nutrition security (Mizik, 2021; Thornton et al., 2022). However, there is often little understanding of the potential positive and negative externalities that these programs can have (Smith et al., 2021), particularly in terms of peace and security. Maladaptation is the process whereby improperly built adaptation strategies can result in more vulnerability of other systems, sectors or social groups (Schipper, 2020; Barnett & O’Neill, 2010). It can create and sustain lock-ins, magnify inequity, marginalize people, and places vulnerable to climate-related risks, such as low-income households, people who reside in informal settlements, ethnic minorities, and Indigenous Peoples among others (IPCC, 2022). These are commonly recognized drivers of conflict which must be accounted for while designing programs to avoid creating or exacerbating conflicts. Acknowledging the interlinkages between climate action, natural resource use and peace and security is fundamental to integrate climate and conflict-sensitive programming interventions. Maladaptive climate initiatives neglecting those associations can foster power asymmetries, grievances, and competition for resources, especially in conflict-affected and fragile contexts (Moran et al., 2018; Krampe et al., 2021). |
| format | Informe técnico |
| id | CGSpace128019 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | CGIAR FOCUS Climate Security |
| publisherStr | CGIAR FOCUS Climate Security |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1280192025-11-05T12:27:12Z Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya Sarzana, Carolina Melgar, Adriana Meddings, George Läderach, Peter R.D. Pacillo, Grazia resource management participatory approaches climate change Climate adaptation interventions, such as programs promoting climate-smart agricultural innovations, are proving effective in increasing farmer resilience as well as food and nutrition security (Mizik, 2021; Thornton et al., 2022). However, there is often little understanding of the potential positive and negative externalities that these programs can have (Smith et al., 2021), particularly in terms of peace and security. Maladaptation is the process whereby improperly built adaptation strategies can result in more vulnerability of other systems, sectors or social groups (Schipper, 2020; Barnett & O’Neill, 2010). It can create and sustain lock-ins, magnify inequity, marginalize people, and places vulnerable to climate-related risks, such as low-income households, people who reside in informal settlements, ethnic minorities, and Indigenous Peoples among others (IPCC, 2022). These are commonly recognized drivers of conflict which must be accounted for while designing programs to avoid creating or exacerbating conflicts. Acknowledging the interlinkages between climate action, natural resource use and peace and security is fundamental to integrate climate and conflict-sensitive programming interventions. Maladaptive climate initiatives neglecting those associations can foster power asymmetries, grievances, and competition for resources, especially in conflict-affected and fragile contexts (Moran et al., 2018; Krampe et al., 2021). 2022-12-30 2023-01-24T11:39:53Z 2023-01-24T11:39:53Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/128019 en Open Access application/pdf CGIAR FOCUS Climate Security Sarzana, C., Melgar, A., Meddings, G., Laderach, P. and Pacillo G. 2022. Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool: A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya. CGIAR Focus Climate Security |
| spellingShingle | resource management participatory approaches climate change Sarzana, Carolina Melgar, Adriana Meddings, George Läderach, Peter R.D. Pacillo, Grazia Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya |
| title | Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya |
| title_full | Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya |
| title_fullStr | Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya |
| title_full_unstemmed | Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya |
| title_short | Piloting the Climate Security Sensitiveness Scoring Tool (CSST). A case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of Participatory Rangeland Management (PRM) in Baringo, Kenya |
| title_sort | piloting the climate security sensitiveness scoring tool csst a case study assessing the climate security sensitiveness of participatory rangeland management prm in baringo kenya |
| topic | resource management participatory approaches climate change |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/128019 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sarzanacarolina pilotingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessscoringtoolcsstacasestudyassessingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessofparticipatoryrangelandmanagementprminbaringokenya AT melgaradriana pilotingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessscoringtoolcsstacasestudyassessingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessofparticipatoryrangelandmanagementprminbaringokenya AT meddingsgeorge pilotingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessscoringtoolcsstacasestudyassessingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessofparticipatoryrangelandmanagementprminbaringokenya AT laderachpeterrd pilotingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessscoringtoolcsstacasestudyassessingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessofparticipatoryrangelandmanagementprminbaringokenya AT pacillograzia pilotingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessscoringtoolcsstacasestudyassessingtheclimatesecuritysensitivenessofparticipatoryrangelandmanagementprminbaringokenya |