Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon

Community forest management (CFM) is promoted as a strategy to reach multiple development outcomes including the sustainable use of forest resources, forest conservation, poverty alleviation, and social equity through the devolution of rights to forest-dependent communities. Developing effective and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarmiento Barletti, J.P., Cronkleton, P., Heise Vigil, N.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Resilience Alliance, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127974
_version_ 1855515510355001344
author Sarmiento Barletti, J.P.
Cronkleton, P.
Heise Vigil, N.
author_browse Cronkleton, P.
Heise Vigil, N.
Sarmiento Barletti, J.P.
author_facet Sarmiento Barletti, J.P.
Cronkleton, P.
Heise Vigil, N.
author_sort Sarmiento Barletti, J.P.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Community forest management (CFM) is promoted as a strategy to reach multiple development outcomes including the sustainable use of forest resources, forest conservation, poverty alleviation, and social equity through the devolution of rights to forest-dependent communities. Developing effective and equitable strategies to promote CFM requires consensus on its goals and the approaches for reaching those goals. Finding common ground among diverse actors involved in the promotion of CFM can be a challenge when their multifaceted expectations and beliefs are not explicitly enunciated or consciously expressed, obscuring contradictions, conflicting objectives, or even shared agendas. An initial step to reaching consensus would be to clarify the range of perspectives that exist to identify common ground and areas of divergent opinion. We report on an initiative applying Q-methodology as a means of identifying differing perspectives on CFM through interviews with 34 informants representing 6 stakeholder groups involved in the promotion of CFM in the Peruvian Amazon: Indigenous leaders, government policymakers, technicians from non-governmental organizations (NGOs), university professors, forestry students, and representatives of donor agencies. We found four different perspectives on what CFM should do: balance conservation with community rights, encourage capacity and enterprise development, technical oversight to protect forests on behalf of Indigenous communities, and support for grassroots Indigenous autonomy. These perspectives revealed differences in how conservation should be achieved and where balance between technical requirements, Indigenous environmental management, and stewardship practices should be favored. Despite different viewpoints, the perspectives also revealed shared understanding of CFM as a mechanism that could emphasize both supporting community rights and conservation goals. This example illustrates how Q-methodology can generate information on the range of perceptions underlying broad strategies such as the promotion of CFM that can facilitate dialogue around shared pathways and agendas.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace127974
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Resilience Alliance, Inc.
publisherStr Resilience Alliance, Inc.
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1279742025-10-26T12:54:18Z Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon Sarmiento Barletti, J.P. Cronkleton, P. Heise Vigil, N. community forestry forest management conservation indigenous people ecology development sustainability resource conservation poverty alleviation equity land rights communities stakeholders indigenous peoples policies non-governmental organizations forests methodology amazon river Community forest management (CFM) is promoted as a strategy to reach multiple development outcomes including the sustainable use of forest resources, forest conservation, poverty alleviation, and social equity through the devolution of rights to forest-dependent communities. Developing effective and equitable strategies to promote CFM requires consensus on its goals and the approaches for reaching those goals. Finding common ground among diverse actors involved in the promotion of CFM can be a challenge when their multifaceted expectations and beliefs are not explicitly enunciated or consciously expressed, obscuring contradictions, conflicting objectives, or even shared agendas. An initial step to reaching consensus would be to clarify the range of perspectives that exist to identify common ground and areas of divergent opinion. We report on an initiative applying Q-methodology as a means of identifying differing perspectives on CFM through interviews with 34 informants representing 6 stakeholder groups involved in the promotion of CFM in the Peruvian Amazon: Indigenous leaders, government policymakers, technicians from non-governmental organizations (NGOs), university professors, forestry students, and representatives of donor agencies. We found four different perspectives on what CFM should do: balance conservation with community rights, encourage capacity and enterprise development, technical oversight to protect forests on behalf of Indigenous communities, and support for grassroots Indigenous autonomy. These perspectives revealed differences in how conservation should be achieved and where balance between technical requirements, Indigenous environmental management, and stewardship practices should be favored. Despite different viewpoints, the perspectives also revealed shared understanding of CFM as a mechanism that could emphasize both supporting community rights and conservation goals. This example illustrates how Q-methodology can generate information on the range of perceptions underlying broad strategies such as the promotion of CFM that can facilitate dialogue around shared pathways and agendas. 2022-11-15 2023-01-24T08:14:33Z 2023-01-24T08:14:33Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127974 en Open Access Resilience Alliance, Inc. Sarmiento Barletti, J., P. Cronkleton, and N. M. Heise Vigil. 2022. Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon. Ecology and Society 27(4):12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13524-270412
spellingShingle community forestry
forest management
conservation
indigenous people
ecology
development
sustainability
resource conservation
poverty alleviation
equity
land rights
communities
stakeholders
indigenous peoples
policies
non-governmental organizations
forests
methodology
amazon river
Sarmiento Barletti, J.P.
Cronkleton, P.
Heise Vigil, N.
Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon
title Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon
title_full Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon
title_fullStr Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon
title_full_unstemmed Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon
title_short Using Q-methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon
title_sort using q methodology to bridge different understandings on community forest management lessons from the peruvian amazon
topic community forestry
forest management
conservation
indigenous people
ecology
development
sustainability
resource conservation
poverty alleviation
equity
land rights
communities
stakeholders
indigenous peoples
policies
non-governmental organizations
forests
methodology
amazon river
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127974
work_keys_str_mv AT sarmientobarlettijp usingqmethodologytobridgedifferentunderstandingsoncommunityforestmanagementlessonsfromtheperuvianamazon
AT cronkletonp usingqmethodologytobridgedifferentunderstandingsoncommunityforestmanagementlessonsfromtheperuvianamazon
AT heisevigiln usingqmethodologytobridgedifferentunderstandingsoncommunityforestmanagementlessonsfromtheperuvianamazon