Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries

Livelihood diversification is increasingly central to policy advice and investments in rural development and fisheries management. For small-scale fishing communities in low- to middle-income countries, more diverse livelihoods are generally hypothesized to reduce fishing pressure and vulnerabilitie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roscher, Matthew, Allison, Edward H., Mills, David, Eriksson, Hampus, Hellebrandt, Denis, Andrew, Neil
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127392
_version_ 1855525101758316544
author Roscher, Matthew
Allison, Edward H.
Mills, David
Eriksson, Hampus
Hellebrandt, Denis
Andrew, Neil
author_browse Allison, Edward H.
Andrew, Neil
Eriksson, Hampus
Hellebrandt, Denis
Mills, David
Roscher, Matthew
author_facet Roscher, Matthew
Allison, Edward H.
Mills, David
Eriksson, Hampus
Hellebrandt, Denis
Andrew, Neil
author_sort Roscher, Matthew
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Livelihood diversification is increasingly central to policy advice and investments in rural development and fisheries management. For small-scale fishing communities in low- to middle-income countries, more diverse livelihoods are generally hypothesized to reduce fishing pressure and vulnerabilities to external shocks and adverse trends while enabling people to construct routes out of poverty. Yet, evidence of impacts from livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries remains sparse. Our examination of the peer-reviewed literature found substantial differences in how livelihood diversification is pursued, and in the realized outcomes from the process of diversification. Studies describing diversified livelihoods were almost as likely to report that livelihoods were not improved or that outcomes were mixed (54% combined) as they were to report improved livelihood outcomes (45%). Furthermore, one of the main theoretical drivers behind the support for diversified livelihoods—ecological conservation benefits—was unexplored in over 70% of studies. Of the minority of studies that did explore ecological outcomes, most reported that ecological conditions had not improved. These findings indicate conceptual ambiguity around livelihood diversification and a lack of empirical evidence supporting its theoretical underpinnings. There remain important questions about the impacts of diversification on multidimensional poverty and ecological conservation. Future research on and investment in diversification should be both more deliberate of what diversification means and more rigorous in the evaluation of its impacts.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace127392
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1273922025-12-08T10:11:39Z Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries Roscher, Matthew Allison, Edward H. Mills, David Eriksson, Hampus Hellebrandt, Denis Andrew, Neil poverty sustainability rural development fish diversity social-ecological systems Livelihood diversification is increasingly central to policy advice and investments in rural development and fisheries management. For small-scale fishing communities in low- to middle-income countries, more diverse livelihoods are generally hypothesized to reduce fishing pressure and vulnerabilities to external shocks and adverse trends while enabling people to construct routes out of poverty. Yet, evidence of impacts from livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries remains sparse. Our examination of the peer-reviewed literature found substantial differences in how livelihood diversification is pursued, and in the realized outcomes from the process of diversification. Studies describing diversified livelihoods were almost as likely to report that livelihoods were not improved or that outcomes were mixed (54% combined) as they were to report improved livelihood outcomes (45%). Furthermore, one of the main theoretical drivers behind the support for diversified livelihoods—ecological conservation benefits—was unexplored in over 70% of studies. Of the minority of studies that did explore ecological outcomes, most reported that ecological conditions had not improved. These findings indicate conceptual ambiguity around livelihood diversification and a lack of empirical evidence supporting its theoretical underpinnings. There remain important questions about the impacts of diversification on multidimensional poverty and ecological conservation. Future research on and investment in diversification should be both more deliberate of what diversification means and more rigorous in the evaluation of its impacts. 2022-07 2023-01-18T13:11:03Z 2023-01-18T13:11:03Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127392 en Open Access application/pdf Wiley Matthew Roscher, Edward (Eddie) Allison, David Mills, Hampus Eriksson, Denis Hellebrandt, Neil Andrew. (1/7/2022). Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 23 (4), pp. 910-925.
spellingShingle poverty
sustainability
rural development
fish
diversity
social-ecological systems
Roscher, Matthew
Allison, Edward H.
Mills, David
Eriksson, Hampus
Hellebrandt, Denis
Andrew, Neil
Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
title Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
title_full Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
title_fullStr Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
title_short Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
title_sort sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small scale fisheries
topic poverty
sustainability
rural development
fish
diversity
social-ecological systems
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127392
work_keys_str_mv AT roschermatthew sustainabledevelopmentoutcomesoflivelihooddiversificationinsmallscalefisheries
AT allisonedwardh sustainabledevelopmentoutcomesoflivelihooddiversificationinsmallscalefisheries
AT millsdavid sustainabledevelopmentoutcomesoflivelihooddiversificationinsmallscalefisheries
AT erikssonhampus sustainabledevelopmentoutcomesoflivelihooddiversificationinsmallscalefisheries
AT hellebrandtdenis sustainabledevelopmentoutcomesoflivelihooddiversificationinsmallscalefisheries
AT andrewneil sustainabledevelopmentoutcomesoflivelihooddiversificationinsmallscalefisheries