Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya

Seed treatment presents an opportunity to boost bean productivity; however, the technology has not been widely tested in Kenya and the sub Saharan Africa region. An experiment was carried out at Kandara, Central Kenya to compare the effects of seed treatment applications on bean performance. The spl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waswa, Boaz Shaban, Kamau, Eliezah, Karanja, David, Mairura, Franklin S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Academic Journals 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127033
_version_ 1855535656581726208
author Waswa, Boaz Shaban
Kamau, Eliezah
Karanja, David
Mairura, Franklin S.
author_browse Kamau, Eliezah
Karanja, David
Mairura, Franklin S.
Waswa, Boaz Shaban
author_facet Waswa, Boaz Shaban
Kamau, Eliezah
Karanja, David
Mairura, Franklin S.
author_sort Waswa, Boaz Shaban
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Seed treatment presents an opportunity to boost bean productivity; however, the technology has not been widely tested in Kenya and the sub Saharan Africa region. An experiment was carried out at Kandara, Central Kenya to compare the effects of seed treatment applications on bean performance. The split-plot design experiment with three replicates included four seed treatment products: Apron Star, Seed Plus, Gro Plus and TriCoat applied at recommended and half recommended rates with two bean varieties as test crop. Split-plot ANOVA was implemented using Genstat and agricolae R procedures to compare the effects of seed treatment applications on aphid pest severity and bean performance parameters. Varietal performance differences to the seed treatment were observed with Nyota variety performing better than KATB1. Generally, Apron Star at recommended rates reported lowest pest incidences and consistent bean performance over the two cropping seasons. Consistent treatment effects were observed for recommended rates compared to half rate applications. Under favorable environmental conditions, use of the seed treatment products alone produced yields comparable to the fertilizer treatment. The benefits observed from use of seed treatment technology makes it a potentially sustainable strategy for improving productivity for cash strapped small-scale producers in the region.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace127033
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Academic Journals
publisherStr Academic Journals
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1270332025-11-11T19:02:31Z Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya Waswa, Boaz Shaban Kamau, Eliezah Karanja, David Mairura, Franklin S. seed treatment common beans kenya diseases productivity phaseolus performance assessment Seed treatment presents an opportunity to boost bean productivity; however, the technology has not been widely tested in Kenya and the sub Saharan Africa region. An experiment was carried out at Kandara, Central Kenya to compare the effects of seed treatment applications on bean performance. The split-plot design experiment with three replicates included four seed treatment products: Apron Star, Seed Plus, Gro Plus and TriCoat applied at recommended and half recommended rates with two bean varieties as test crop. Split-plot ANOVA was implemented using Genstat and agricolae R procedures to compare the effects of seed treatment applications on aphid pest severity and bean performance parameters. Varietal performance differences to the seed treatment were observed with Nyota variety performing better than KATB1. Generally, Apron Star at recommended rates reported lowest pest incidences and consistent bean performance over the two cropping seasons. Consistent treatment effects were observed for recommended rates compared to half rate applications. Under favorable environmental conditions, use of the seed treatment products alone produced yields comparable to the fertilizer treatment. The benefits observed from use of seed treatment technology makes it a potentially sustainable strategy for improving productivity for cash strapped small-scale producers in the region. 2022-02 2023-01-13T09:21:31Z 2023-01-13T09:21:31Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127033 en Open Access application/pdf Academic Journals Waswa, B.S.; Kamau, E.; Karanja, D.; Mairura, F. (2022) Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research 18(2) p. 95-105. ISSN: 1991-637X
spellingShingle seed treatment
common beans
kenya
diseases
productivity
phaseolus
performance assessment
Waswa, Boaz Shaban
Kamau, Eliezah
Karanja, David
Mairura, Franklin S.
Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya
title Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya
title_full Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya
title_fullStr Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya
title_short Response of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to seed treatment in Central Kenya
title_sort response of common beans phaseolus vulgaris l to seed treatment in central kenya
topic seed treatment
common beans
kenya
diseases
productivity
phaseolus
performance assessment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/127033
work_keys_str_mv AT waswaboazshaban responseofcommonbeansphaseolusvulgarisltoseedtreatmentincentralkenya
AT kamaueliezah responseofcommonbeansphaseolusvulgarisltoseedtreatmentincentralkenya
AT karanjadavid responseofcommonbeansphaseolusvulgarisltoseedtreatmentincentralkenya
AT mairurafranklins responseofcommonbeansphaseolusvulgarisltoseedtreatmentincentralkenya