Application of the Quality of Research for Development Framework to Initiative Reviews: Lessons Learned
To improve future ISDC external review of CGIAR proposals, ISDC conducted an ex-post analysis of the Initiative review process through a reviewer survey, CGIAR stakeholder consultations, examination of QoR4D reviewer scoring divergence, and Initiative Design Team (IDT) responses to ISDC reviews. The...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Informe técnico |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
CGIAR Independent Science for Development Council
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/126175 |
Ejemplares similares: Application of the Quality of Research for Development Framework to Initiative Reviews: Lessons Learned
- ISDC Review of 12 Initiative Proposals
- ISDC Review of 19 Initiative Proposals
- CGIAR Research Initiative Proposal Review Report: Accelerating Crop Improvement through Genome Editing
- Quality of Research for Development in Practice for One CGIAR
- CGIAR Research Initiative Proposal Review Report: Fragility, Conflict, and Migration
- ISDC Review of 2025-2030 Research and Innovation Inception Reports