Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework

Being able to access, control, and own productive assets such as land, labor, finance, and social capital enables people to create stable and productive lives. Yet relatively little is known about how agricultural development programs can most effectively deliver these outcomes of well-being, empowe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S., Johnson, Nancy L., Quisumbing, Agnes R., Njuki, Jemimah, Behrman, Julia A., Rubin, Deborah, Peterman, Amber, Waithanji, Elizabeth M.
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/12520
_version_ 1855514894624882688
author Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Johnson, Nancy L.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Njuki, Jemimah
Behrman, Julia A.
Rubin, Deborah
Peterman, Amber
Waithanji, Elizabeth M.
author_browse Behrman, Julia A.
Johnson, Nancy L.
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Njuki, Jemimah
Peterman, Amber
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Rubin, Deborah
Waithanji, Elizabeth M.
author_facet Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Johnson, Nancy L.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Njuki, Jemimah
Behrman, Julia A.
Rubin, Deborah
Peterman, Amber
Waithanji, Elizabeth M.
author_sort Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Being able to access, control, and own productive assets such as land, labor, finance, and social capital enables people to create stable and productive lives. Yet relatively little is known about how agricultural development programs can most effectively deliver these outcomes of well-being, empowerment, and higher income in a way that acknowledges differential access to and control over assets by men and women. After reviewing the literature on gender and assets, this paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding the gendered pathways through which asset accumulation occurs, including attention to not only men's and women's assets but also those they share in joint control and ownership. Unlike previous frameworks, this model depicts the gendered dimensions of each component of the pathway in recognition of the evidence that men and women not only control, own, or dispose of assets in different ways, but also access, control, and own different kinds of assets. The framework generates gender-specific hypotheses that can be tested empirically: i) Different types of assets enable different livelihoods, with a greater stock and diversity of assets being associated with more diverse livelihoods and better well-being outcomes; ii) Men and women use different types of assets to cope with different types of shocks; iii) Interventions that increase men's and women's stock of a particular asset improve the bargaining power of the individual(s) who control that asset; and iv) Interventions and policies that reduce the gender gap in assets are better able to achieve development outcomes related to food security, health, and nutrition and other aspects of well-being related to agency and empowerment. The implications of these gender differences for designing agricultural development interventions to increase asset growth and returns to assets as well as for value chain development are discussed. Based on this analysis, additional gaps in knowledge and possible investigations to address them are identified.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace12520
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace125202025-11-04T16:29:22Z Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Johnson, Nancy L. Quisumbing, Agnes R. Njuki, Jemimah Behrman, Julia A. Rubin, Deborah Peterman, Amber Waithanji, Elizabeth M. agricultural development food security social welfare gender Being able to access, control, and own productive assets such as land, labor, finance, and social capital enables people to create stable and productive lives. Yet relatively little is known about how agricultural development programs can most effectively deliver these outcomes of well-being, empowerment, and higher income in a way that acknowledges differential access to and control over assets by men and women. After reviewing the literature on gender and assets, this paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding the gendered pathways through which asset accumulation occurs, including attention to not only men's and women's assets but also those they share in joint control and ownership. Unlike previous frameworks, this model depicts the gendered dimensions of each component of the pathway in recognition of the evidence that men and women not only control, own, or dispose of assets in different ways, but also access, control, and own different kinds of assets. The framework generates gender-specific hypotheses that can be tested empirically: i) Different types of assets enable different livelihoods, with a greater stock and diversity of assets being associated with more diverse livelihoods and better well-being outcomes; ii) Men and women use different types of assets to cope with different types of shocks; iii) Interventions that increase men's and women's stock of a particular asset improve the bargaining power of the individual(s) who control that asset; and iv) Interventions and policies that reduce the gender gap in assets are better able to achieve development outcomes related to food security, health, and nutrition and other aspects of well-being related to agency and empowerment. The implications of these gender differences for designing agricultural development interventions to increase asset growth and returns to assets as well as for value chain development are discussed. Based on this analysis, additional gaps in knowledge and possible investigations to address them are identified. 2011-11-15 2011-12-21T13:15:46Z 2011-12-21T13:15:46Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/12520 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Meinzen-Dick, R., Johnson, N., Quisumbing, A., Njuki, J., Behrman, J., Rubin, D., Peterman, A. and Waithanji, E. 2011. Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework. CAPRi Working Paper 99. Washington, DC: CAPRI. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/12520
spellingShingle agricultural development
food security
social welfare
gender
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Johnson, Nancy L.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Njuki, Jemimah
Behrman, Julia A.
Rubin, Deborah
Peterman, Amber
Waithanji, Elizabeth M.
Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework
title Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework
title_full Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework
title_fullStr Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework
title_full_unstemmed Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework
title_short Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development Programs: A Conceptual Framework
title_sort gender assets and agricultural development programs a conceptual framework
topic agricultural development
food security
social welfare
gender
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/12520
work_keys_str_mv AT meinzendickruths genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework
AT johnsonnancyl genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework
AT quisumbingagnesr genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework
AT njukijemimah genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework
AT behrmanjuliaa genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework
AT rubindeborah genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework
AT petermanamber genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework
AT waithanjielizabethm genderassetsandagriculturaldevelopmentprogramsaconceptualframework