Misperceiving and misreporting input quality: implications for input use and productivity
Farmers in developing countries routinely misperceive or misreport input quality for various reasons, which introduces substantial measurement error in farm survey data. In this paper, we motivate and illustrate, both analytically and empirically, the inferential and behavioral implications of mispe...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/125198 |
Similar Items: Misperceiving and misreporting input quality: implications for input use and productivity
- Measurement errors in agricultural data and their implications on marginal returns to modern agricultural inputs
- Measurement error mechanisms matter: Agricultural intensification with farmer misperceptions and misreporting
- Productivity and welfare effects of Nigeria's e-voucher-based input subsidy program
- The impacts of agricultural input subsidies in Malawi
- Agricultural input markets in Ghana: A descriptive assessment of input dealers in eight districts
- Mbale District (Uganda) counterfeit agricultural inputs (prohibition) ordinance, 2018. Passed to stem the influx of fake agricultural inputs which was discouraging farmer use and reducing trust in the market.