Are landscape approaches possible under authoritarianism? multi-stakeholder governance and social transformation in Myanmar
Landscape Approaches have been proposed as a transferable model of multi-stakeholder governance, yet assume conditions of ideal speech, trust, and transparency that seem untransferable to authoritarian regimes. This paper argues that building Landscape Approaches under authoritarian conditions canno...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/121011 |
Ejemplares similares: Are landscape approaches possible under authoritarianism? multi-stakeholder governance and social transformation in Myanmar
- Landscape governance: Engaging stakeholders to confront climate change
- Multi-stakeholder platforms for the governance of agroecological transitions: Lessons from seven Agroecological Living Landscapes
- Inclusive landscape management plan for the transformation of agrifood systems in the Doma-Rutu socio-ecological landscape, Nigeria
- Multistakeholder platforms for integrated landscape governance: The case of Kalomo District, Zambia
- Data for: Reconciling conservation and development requires enhanced integration and broader aims: A cross-continental assessment of landscape approaches.
- Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: A landscape analysis