Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda
As forest tenure reform is mainstreamed around the world, outcomes are increasingly determined by the institutions that are responsible for administering its operationalisation and translating policy into implementation. This global study examines state institutional contexts of tenure reform in Ken...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/120095 |
| _version_ | 1855539449707888640 |
|---|---|
| author | Rodd, M. Fisher, M. Monterroso, I. Liswanti, N. Maryudi, A. Larson, A.M. Mwangi, E. Herawati, T. |
| author_browse | Fisher, M. Herawati, T. Larson, A.M. Liswanti, N. Maryudi, A. Monterroso, I. Mwangi, E. Rodd, M. |
| author_facet | Rodd, M. Fisher, M. Monterroso, I. Liswanti, N. Maryudi, A. Larson, A.M. Mwangi, E. Herawati, T. |
| author_sort | Rodd, M. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | As forest tenure reform is mainstreamed around the world, outcomes are increasingly determined by the institutions that are responsible for administering its operationalisation and translating policy into implementation. This global study examines state institutional contexts of tenure reform in Kenya, Uganda, Nepal, Indonesia, and Peru. Interviews were administered in 2016–2017 using a fixed questionnaire applied across all countries involving 26–32 respondents from state implementers of forest tenure reform in each country for a total of 145 respondents. Although our study engagement was tailored for specific country contexts, we identified generalisable forest tenure reform trends through comparative analysis. Findings situate the overall bridging role that state institutions play in forest tenure reform, which we describe as falling under three key overarching coordination functions, namely: coordination among implementers, coordination of objectives, and coordination of resources. These three categories provide insights not only for gauging the progress of a country's forest tenure reform, but also for evaluating how robust reforms have been, and where forest tenure reforms are headed in the future. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace120095 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1200952025-12-08T09:54:28Z Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda Rodd, M. Fisher, M. Monterroso, I. Liswanti, N. Maryudi, A. Larson, A.M. Mwangi, E. Herawati, T. land tenure land reform decentralization As forest tenure reform is mainstreamed around the world, outcomes are increasingly determined by the institutions that are responsible for administering its operationalisation and translating policy into implementation. This global study examines state institutional contexts of tenure reform in Kenya, Uganda, Nepal, Indonesia, and Peru. Interviews were administered in 2016–2017 using a fixed questionnaire applied across all countries involving 26–32 respondents from state implementers of forest tenure reform in each country for a total of 145 respondents. Although our study engagement was tailored for specific country contexts, we identified generalisable forest tenure reform trends through comparative analysis. Findings situate the overall bridging role that state institutions play in forest tenure reform, which we describe as falling under three key overarching coordination functions, namely: coordination among implementers, coordination of objectives, and coordination of resources. These three categories provide insights not only for gauging the progress of a country's forest tenure reform, but also for evaluating how robust reforms have been, and where forest tenure reforms are headed in the future. 2022-06 2022-07-14T01:42:26Z 2022-07-14T01:42:26Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/120095 en Open Access Elsevier Rodd, M., Fisher, M., Monterroso, I., Liswanti, N., Maryudi, A., Larson, A.M., Mwangi, E. and Herawati, T. 2022. Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics 139: 102718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102718 |
| spellingShingle | land tenure land reform decentralization Rodd, M. Fisher, M. Monterroso, I. Liswanti, N. Maryudi, A. Larson, A.M. Mwangi, E. Herawati, T. Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda |
| title | Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda |
| title_full | Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda |
| title_fullStr | Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda |
| title_full_unstemmed | Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda |
| title_short | Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda |
| title_sort | coordinating forest tenure reform objectives resources and relations in indonesia kenya nepal peru and uganda |
| topic | land tenure land reform decentralization |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/120095 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT roddm coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda AT fisherm coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda AT monterrosoi coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda AT liswantin coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda AT maryudia coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda AT larsonam coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda AT mwangie coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda AT herawatit coordinatingforesttenurereformobjectivesresourcesandrelationsinindonesiakenyanepalperuanduganda |