Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review
With many of the world’s poor engaged in agriculture, agricultural development programmes often aim to improve livelihoods through improved farming practices. Research on the impacts of agricultural technology interventions is dominated by comparisons of adopters and non-adopters. By contrast, in th...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Springer
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/119892 |
| _version_ | 1855519058895568896 |
|---|---|
| author | Thuijsman, E.S. Braber, Harmen den Andersson, J.A. Descheemaeker, Katrien K. Baudron, Frederic López Ridaura, Santiago Vanlauwe, Bernard Giller, Kenneth E. |
| author_browse | Andersson, J.A. Baudron, Frederic Braber, Harmen den Descheemaeker, Katrien K. Giller, Kenneth E. López Ridaura, Santiago Thuijsman, E.S. Vanlauwe, Bernard |
| author_facet | Thuijsman, E.S. Braber, Harmen den Andersson, J.A. Descheemaeker, Katrien K. Baudron, Frederic López Ridaura, Santiago Vanlauwe, Bernard Giller, Kenneth E. |
| author_sort | Thuijsman, E.S. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | With many of the world’s poor engaged in agriculture, agricultural development programmes often aim to improve livelihoods through improved farming practices. Research on the impacts of agricultural technology interventions is dominated by comparisons of adopters and non-adopters. By contrast, in this literature study, we critically review how technology evaluation studies assess differentiated impacts in smallholder farming communities. We searched systematically for studies which present agricultural technology impacts disaggregated for poor and relatively better-off users (adopters). The major findings of our systematic review are as follows: (1) The number of studies that assessed impact differentiation was startlingly small: we were able to identify only 85, among which only 24 presented empirical findings. (2) These studies confirm an expected trend: absolute benefits are larger for the better-off, and large relative benefits among the poor are mostly due to meagre baseline performance. (3) Households are primarily considered as independent entities, rather than as connected with others directly or indirectly, via markets or common resource pools. (4) Explanations for impact differentiation are mainly sought in existing distributions of structural household characteristics. We collated the explanations provided in the selected studies across a nested hierarchy: the field, the farm or household, and households interacting at the farming system level. We also consider impact differentiation over time. With this, we provide a structured overview of potential drivers of differentiation, to guide future research for development towards explicitly recognizing the poor among the poor, acknowledging unequal impacts, aiming to avoid negative consequences, and mitigating them where they occur. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace119892 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1198922025-11-11T10:08:26Z Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review Thuijsman, E.S. Braber, Harmen den Andersson, J.A. Descheemaeker, Katrien K. Baudron, Frederic López Ridaura, Santiago Vanlauwe, Bernard Giller, Kenneth E. technology transfer evaluation distribution intervention environmental engineering With many of the world’s poor engaged in agriculture, agricultural development programmes often aim to improve livelihoods through improved farming practices. Research on the impacts of agricultural technology interventions is dominated by comparisons of adopters and non-adopters. By contrast, in this literature study, we critically review how technology evaluation studies assess differentiated impacts in smallholder farming communities. We searched systematically for studies which present agricultural technology impacts disaggregated for poor and relatively better-off users (adopters). The major findings of our systematic review are as follows: (1) The number of studies that assessed impact differentiation was startlingly small: we were able to identify only 85, among which only 24 presented empirical findings. (2) These studies confirm an expected trend: absolute benefits are larger for the better-off, and large relative benefits among the poor are mostly due to meagre baseline performance. (3) Households are primarily considered as independent entities, rather than as connected with others directly or indirectly, via markets or common resource pools. (4) Explanations for impact differentiation are mainly sought in existing distributions of structural household characteristics. We collated the explanations provided in the selected studies across a nested hierarchy: the field, the farm or household, and households interacting at the farming system level. We also consider impact differentiation over time. With this, we provide a structured overview of potential drivers of differentiation, to guide future research for development towards explicitly recognizing the poor among the poor, acknowledging unequal impacts, aiming to avoid negative consequences, and mitigating them where they occur. 2022-06 2022-06-22T09:15:50Z 2022-06-22T09:15:50Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/119892 en Open Access application/pdf Springer Thuijsman, E.S., den Braber, H., Andersson, J.A., Descheemaeker, K., Baudron, F., López-Ridaura, S., ... & Giller, K. E. (2022). Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(3), 1-16. |
| spellingShingle | technology transfer evaluation distribution intervention environmental engineering Thuijsman, E.S. Braber, Harmen den Andersson, J.A. Descheemaeker, Katrien K. Baudron, Frederic López Ridaura, Santiago Vanlauwe, Bernard Giller, Kenneth E. Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review |
| title | Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review |
| title_full | Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review |
| title_fullStr | Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review |
| title_short | Indifferent to difference? Understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders. A review |
| title_sort | indifferent to difference understanding the unequal impacts of farming technologies among smallholders a review |
| topic | technology transfer evaluation distribution intervention environmental engineering |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/119892 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thuijsmanes indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview AT braberharmenden indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview AT anderssonja indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview AT descheemaekerkatrienk indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview AT baudronfrederic indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview AT lopezridaurasantiago indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview AT vanlauwebernard indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview AT gillerkennethe indifferenttodifferenceunderstandingtheunequalimpactsoffarmingtechnologiesamongsmallholdersareview |