Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators
This paper explores outcome indicators and process principles to evaluate landscape resilience in agro-ecosystems, drawing on outcome indicator case studies of the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). Four questions are addressed: (1) which outcome indicators and process princ...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Informe técnico |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Water Management Institute
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118351 |
| _version_ | 1855529411320741888 |
|---|---|
| author | Fabricius, C. Novellie, P. Ringler, Claudia Uhlenbrook, Stefan Wright, D. |
| author_browse | Fabricius, C. Novellie, P. Ringler, Claudia Uhlenbrook, Stefan Wright, D. |
| author_facet | Fabricius, C. Novellie, P. Ringler, Claudia Uhlenbrook, Stefan Wright, D. |
| author_sort | Fabricius, C. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | This paper explores outcome indicators and process principles to evaluate landscape resilience in agro-ecosystems, drawing on outcome indicator case studies of the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). Four questions are addressed: (1) which outcome indicators and process principles feature most prominently in the seminal literature on resilient agro-ecological landscapes? (2) to what extent are these principles represented in CGIAR Outcome Impact Case Reports (OICRs) and selected peer-reviewed studies? (3) how does the use of process principles in the case studies compare to their occurrence in the theoretical literature? and (4) which process principles co-occur with related outcome indicators in the OICRs? The findings enable researchers and practitioners to be more specific about the outcomes and processes that drive resilience in agro-ecosystems, thereby informing adaptive program management. Seven novel research themes are proposed. |
| format | Informe técnico |
| id | CGSpace118351 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | International Water Management Institute |
| publisherStr | International Water Management Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1183512025-11-07T08:03:35Z Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators Fabricius, C. Novellie, P. Ringler, Claudia Uhlenbrook, Stefan Wright, D. cgiar case studies stakeholders agrifood systems land rights social inclusion agricultural landscape gender equity agroecosystems resilience land access biodiversity production systems agroecology meta-analysis indicators monitoring sustainability farm income institutions research programmes soil management livelihoods ecosystem resilience ecosystem services impact assessment governance This paper explores outcome indicators and process principles to evaluate landscape resilience in agro-ecosystems, drawing on outcome indicator case studies of the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). Four questions are addressed: (1) which outcome indicators and process principles feature most prominently in the seminal literature on resilient agro-ecological landscapes? (2) to what extent are these principles represented in CGIAR Outcome Impact Case Reports (OICRs) and selected peer-reviewed studies? (3) how does the use of process principles in the case studies compare to their occurrence in the theoretical literature? and (4) which process principles co-occur with related outcome indicators in the OICRs? The findings enable researchers and practitioners to be more specific about the outcomes and processes that drive resilience in agro-ecosystems, thereby informing adaptive program management. Seven novel research themes are proposed. 2021-12-31 2022-03-08T09:56:04Z 2022-03-08T09:56:04Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118351 en Open Access application/pdf International Water Management Institute Fabricius, C.; Novellie, P.; Ringler, C.; Uhlenbrook, Stefan; Wright, D. 2021. Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 36p. (WLE Legacy Series 4) [doi: https://doi.org/10.5337/2022.206] |
| spellingShingle | cgiar case studies stakeholders agrifood systems land rights social inclusion agricultural landscape gender equity agroecosystems resilience land access biodiversity production systems agroecology meta-analysis indicators monitoring sustainability farm income institutions research programmes soil management livelihoods ecosystem resilience ecosystem services impact assessment governance Fabricius, C. Novellie, P. Ringler, Claudia Uhlenbrook, Stefan Wright, D. Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators |
| title | Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators |
| title_full | Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators |
| title_fullStr | Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators |
| title_full_unstemmed | Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators |
| title_short | Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators |
| title_sort | resilience in agro ecological landscapes process principles and outcome indicators |
| topic | cgiar case studies stakeholders agrifood systems land rights social inclusion agricultural landscape gender equity agroecosystems resilience land access biodiversity production systems agroecology meta-analysis indicators monitoring sustainability farm income institutions research programmes soil management livelihoods ecosystem resilience ecosystem services impact assessment governance |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118351 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fabriciusc resilienceinagroecologicallandscapesprocessprinciplesandoutcomeindicators AT novelliep resilienceinagroecologicallandscapesprocessprinciplesandoutcomeindicators AT ringlerclaudia resilienceinagroecologicallandscapesprocessprinciplesandoutcomeindicators AT uhlenbrookstefan resilienceinagroecologicallandscapesprocessprinciplesandoutcomeindicators AT wrightd resilienceinagroecologicallandscapesprocessprinciplesandoutcomeindicators |