Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report

This Honduras report is part of a series of seven country level studies (Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia and Republic of Congo) which intend to gather qualitative and quantitative evidence of the impacts of the Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade – Voluntary Partn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goetghebuer, T., Fourmy, R., Leszczynska, N., Almeida, B., Newbery, J., Cerutti, P.O.
Formato: Informe técnico
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Center for International Forestry Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118186
_version_ 1855516511758712832
author Goetghebuer, T.
Fourmy, R.
Leszczynska, N.
Almeida, B.
Newbery, J.
Cerutti, P.O.
author_browse Almeida, B.
Cerutti, P.O.
Fourmy, R.
Goetghebuer, T.
Leszczynska, N.
Newbery, J.
author_facet Goetghebuer, T.
Fourmy, R.
Leszczynska, N.
Almeida, B.
Newbery, J.
Cerutti, P.O.
author_sort Goetghebuer, T.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This Honduras report is part of a series of seven country level studies (Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia and Republic of Congo) which intend to gather qualitative and quantitative evidence of the impacts of the Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade – Voluntary Partnership Agreement (FLEGT-VPA) process to date. This initiative was financed by the European Union and results are placed within the global European Union-FLEGT (EU-FLEGT) Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) indicator database. The analysis is structured along five key thematic areas (with indicators clustered into governance and institutional effectiveness, illegal logging, forest conditions, economic development, and livelihoods and poverty). The methodology used is designed to be replicable over time as well as applicable to other countries. Each country assessment provides a baseline for future studies in the same country, that would help to measure progress (or regress) between two points in time. More countries can also be added over time to increase the overall sample and help to derive lessons based on more evidence. By covering seven countries that are in different stages of the VPA process – from negotiation to implementation to issuance of FLEGT licences – findings allow for global lessons to be learned across different geographies and time. These lessons and global findings are presented in a separate synthesis report, which combines results to outline a bigger picture of VPA process impacts where possible.
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace118186
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Center for International Forestry Research
publisherStr Center for International Forestry Research
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1181862023-02-15T01:20:41Z Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report Goetghebuer, T. Fourmy, R. Leszczynska, N. Almeida, B. Newbery, J. Cerutti, P.O. household surveys governance economic development This Honduras report is part of a series of seven country level studies (Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia and Republic of Congo) which intend to gather qualitative and quantitative evidence of the impacts of the Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade – Voluntary Partnership Agreement (FLEGT-VPA) process to date. This initiative was financed by the European Union and results are placed within the global European Union-FLEGT (EU-FLEGT) Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) indicator database. The analysis is structured along five key thematic areas (with indicators clustered into governance and institutional effectiveness, illegal logging, forest conditions, economic development, and livelihoods and poverty). The methodology used is designed to be replicable over time as well as applicable to other countries. Each country assessment provides a baseline for future studies in the same country, that would help to measure progress (or regress) between two points in time. More countries can also be added over time to increase the overall sample and help to derive lessons based on more evidence. By covering seven countries that are in different stages of the VPA process – from negotiation to implementation to issuance of FLEGT licences – findings allow for global lessons to be learned across different geographies and time. These lessons and global findings are presented in a separate synthesis report, which combines results to outline a bigger picture of VPA process impacts where possible. 2022-02-02 2022-02-21T08:35:24Z 2022-02-21T08:35:24Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118186 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Goetghebuer, T., Fourmy, R., Leszczynska, N., Almeida, B., Newbery, J., Cerutti, P.O., 2022. . Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
spellingShingle household surveys
governance
economic development
Goetghebuer, T.
Fourmy, R.
Leszczynska, N.
Almeida, B.
Newbery, J.
Cerutti, P.O.
Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report
title Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report
title_full Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report
title_fullStr Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report
title_full_unstemmed Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report
title_short Collecting evidence of FLEGT-VPA impacts: Honduras country report
title_sort collecting evidence of flegt vpa impacts honduras country report
topic household surveys
governance
economic development
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118186
work_keys_str_mv AT goetghebuert collectingevidenceofflegtvpaimpactshondurascountryreport
AT fourmyr collectingevidenceofflegtvpaimpactshondurascountryreport
AT leszczynskan collectingevidenceofflegtvpaimpactshondurascountryreport
AT almeidab collectingevidenceofflegtvpaimpactshondurascountryreport
AT newberyj collectingevidenceofflegtvpaimpactshondurascountryreport
AT ceruttipo collectingevidenceofflegtvpaimpactshondurascountryreport