Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care

Measuring the impact of integrated systems research has been a challenge to CGIAR since it expanded into natural resource management research in the early 1990s. Despite repeated efforts, it has yet to be adequately addressed. Meanwhile, the demand for evidence of impact on development outcomes has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Johnson, Nancy
Formato: Informe técnico
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Water Management Institute 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118156
_version_ 1855514219739348992
author Johnson, Nancy
author_browse Johnson, Nancy
author_facet Johnson, Nancy
author_sort Johnson, Nancy
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Measuring the impact of integrated systems research has been a challenge to CGIAR since it expanded into natural resource management research in the early 1990s. Despite repeated efforts, it has yet to be adequately addressed. Meanwhile, the demand for evidence of impact on development outcomes has only increased, as have calls for greater methodological rigor. At the same time, there is greater recognition of the complex, systemic nature of many problems facing society today and the need for new approaches to designing, implementing and evaluating research. In an attempt to provide pragmatic guidance to One CGIAR and others on how to address these issues in the design of research for development programs that involve integrated systems research (ISR), CGIAR held a virtual workshop on Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research on September 27–30, 2021. Participants took stock of recent experiences and reviewed existing and new tools and approaches with the potential to overcome conceptual, empirical and institutional challenges that obstruct ISR. In terms of methods for assessing the impact of ISR, the workshop highlighted recent advances in the use of geospatial data and called for more significant investment in both the quantity and quality of qualitative methods. Integrating monitoring, evaluation, learning and impact assessment (MELIA) into the research programs will require greater capacity on the part of managers, researchers and MELIA specialists to use theory of change effectively and efficiently for multiple purposes. It is also becoming increasingly clear that some of the challenges in conducting ISR in CGIAR are not technical but have to do with structures, processes and internal tensions within CGIAR itself about the kind of outcomes it seeks and the way it organizes and implements research. While calling for research that contributes to sustainability and systems transformation, CGIAR has in different ways failed to adequately support, and to learn from, the kinds of integrated systems approaches that will likely underpin success. Workshop participants proposed tackling this head-on through changing CGIAR systems, processes and incentive structures, and engaging directly with funders on how impact is understood and measured.
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace118156
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher International Water Management Institute
publisherStr International Water Management Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1181562025-11-07T08:53:07Z Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care Johnson, Nancy agricultural research for development integrated systems systems research impact assessment cgiar research programmes monitoring and evaluation natural resources management investment funding organizational learning food systems land use water systems remote sensing Measuring the impact of integrated systems research has been a challenge to CGIAR since it expanded into natural resource management research in the early 1990s. Despite repeated efforts, it has yet to be adequately addressed. Meanwhile, the demand for evidence of impact on development outcomes has only increased, as have calls for greater methodological rigor. At the same time, there is greater recognition of the complex, systemic nature of many problems facing society today and the need for new approaches to designing, implementing and evaluating research. In an attempt to provide pragmatic guidance to One CGIAR and others on how to address these issues in the design of research for development programs that involve integrated systems research (ISR), CGIAR held a virtual workshop on Measuring the Impact of Integrated Systems Research on September 27–30, 2021. Participants took stock of recent experiences and reviewed existing and new tools and approaches with the potential to overcome conceptual, empirical and institutional challenges that obstruct ISR. In terms of methods for assessing the impact of ISR, the workshop highlighted recent advances in the use of geospatial data and called for more significant investment in both the quantity and quality of qualitative methods. Integrating monitoring, evaluation, learning and impact assessment (MELIA) into the research programs will require greater capacity on the part of managers, researchers and MELIA specialists to use theory of change effectively and efficiently for multiple purposes. It is also becoming increasingly clear that some of the challenges in conducting ISR in CGIAR are not technical but have to do with structures, processes and internal tensions within CGIAR itself about the kind of outcomes it seeks and the way it organizes and implements research. While calling for research that contributes to sustainability and systems transformation, CGIAR has in different ways failed to adequately support, and to learn from, the kinds of integrated systems approaches that will likely underpin success. Workshop participants proposed tackling this head-on through changing CGIAR systems, processes and incentive structures, and engaging directly with funders on how impact is understood and measured. 2021-12-31 2022-02-17T20:01:31Z 2022-02-17T20:01:31Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118156 en Open Access application/pdf International Water Management Institute Johnson, N. 2021. Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 21p. [doi: https://doi.org/10.5337/2022.203]
spellingShingle agricultural research for development
integrated systems
systems research
impact assessment
cgiar
research programmes
monitoring and evaluation
natural resources management
investment
funding
organizational learning
food systems
land use
water systems
remote sensing
Johnson, Nancy
Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care
title Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care
title_full Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care
title_fullStr Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care
title_short Measuring the impact of integrated systems research: promising approaches and why CGIAR needs to care
title_sort measuring the impact of integrated systems research promising approaches and why cgiar needs to care
topic agricultural research for development
integrated systems
systems research
impact assessment
cgiar
research programmes
monitoring and evaluation
natural resources management
investment
funding
organizational learning
food systems
land use
water systems
remote sensing
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118156
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonnancy measuringtheimpactofintegratedsystemsresearchpromisingapproachesandwhycgiarneedstocare