Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils

A number of studies across sub-Saharan Africa have recently reported poor crop responses and low agronomic use efficiencies of applied nitrogen (AEN), phosphorus (AEP) and potassium (AEK). However, the conditions under which non-responsiveness occurs, its underlying causes and its probability of occ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sileshi, Gudeta W., Kihara, Job Maguta, Tamene, Lulseged D., Vanlauwe, Bernard, Phiri, Elijah, Jama, Bashir
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118134
_version_ 1855519674750468096
author Sileshi, Gudeta W.
Kihara, Job Maguta
Tamene, Lulseged D.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Phiri, Elijah
Jama, Bashir
author_browse Jama, Bashir
Kihara, Job Maguta
Phiri, Elijah
Sileshi, Gudeta W.
Tamene, Lulseged D.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
author_facet Sileshi, Gudeta W.
Kihara, Job Maguta
Tamene, Lulseged D.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Phiri, Elijah
Jama, Bashir
author_sort Sileshi, Gudeta W.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description A number of studies across sub-Saharan Africa have recently reported poor crop responses and low agronomic use efficiencies of applied nitrogen (AEN), phosphorus (AEP) and potassium (AEK). However, the conditions under which non-responsiveness occurs, its underlying causes and its probability of occurrence on different soil types are not well understood. Using data from 542 sites and 14 soil types in 23 African countries, we provide novel insights into the linkage between lack of response to applied N, P and K, the mineralogy of soils and their resilience to erosion. We estimated mean responses as well as the probabilities (ϕ) of no response in terms of response ratio (RR), yield gain (YG) and agronomic efficiency. Here we defined ‘no response’ as zero agronomic response to fertilizer inputs in a given site and year indexed by either RR ≤ 1, AEN ≤ 0, AEP ≤ 0 or AEK ≤ 0. The highest risks of no response were recorded on the iron-rich Plinthosols (ϕ = 0.26) followed by the aluminium-rich Alisols (ϕ = 0.16) and the erosion-prone Lixisols (ϕ = 0.16) and Leptosols (ϕ = 0.13). In terms of yield gains, the highest risk of low response (i.e., YG ≤ 0.5) was recorded on Alisols (ϕ = 0.47) and the lowest on Fluvisols (ϕ = 0.05). Cambisols, Fluvisols, Luvisols and Nitisols were deemed highly responsive to NPK fertilizer. The risks of no response were significantly higher on soils derived from siliceous than mafic parent materials, soil types with low resilience to erosion, soils with low-activity clays and high P fixation capacity. It is concluded that maize grain yields can exceed 3 t ha-1 with high probability (ϕ > 0.80) on Andosols, Nitisols and Vertisols, but with very low probability (ϕ < 0.30) on Alisols and Arenosols. It is also concluded that across soil types and agroecological zones, the risk of no response is up to two times more on farmers’ fields than on research stations. Here, we discuss the implications of these finding for the design and location of future agronomic trials. We also provide insights to guide the targeting of fertilizer subsidies where nutrients can be more efficiently used.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace118134
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1181342025-11-11T17:45:03Z Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils Sileshi, Gudeta W. Kihara, Job Maguta Tamene, Lulseged D. Vanlauwe, Bernard Phiri, Elijah Jama, Bashir crop production soil management fertilizer application producción vegetal manejo del suelo aplicación de abonos A number of studies across sub-Saharan Africa have recently reported poor crop responses and low agronomic use efficiencies of applied nitrogen (AEN), phosphorus (AEP) and potassium (AEK). However, the conditions under which non-responsiveness occurs, its underlying causes and its probability of occurrence on different soil types are not well understood. Using data from 542 sites and 14 soil types in 23 African countries, we provide novel insights into the linkage between lack of response to applied N, P and K, the mineralogy of soils and their resilience to erosion. We estimated mean responses as well as the probabilities (ϕ) of no response in terms of response ratio (RR), yield gain (YG) and agronomic efficiency. Here we defined ‘no response’ as zero agronomic response to fertilizer inputs in a given site and year indexed by either RR ≤ 1, AEN ≤ 0, AEP ≤ 0 or AEK ≤ 0. The highest risks of no response were recorded on the iron-rich Plinthosols (ϕ = 0.26) followed by the aluminium-rich Alisols (ϕ = 0.16) and the erosion-prone Lixisols (ϕ = 0.16) and Leptosols (ϕ = 0.13). In terms of yield gains, the highest risk of low response (i.e., YG ≤ 0.5) was recorded on Alisols (ϕ = 0.47) and the lowest on Fluvisols (ϕ = 0.05). Cambisols, Fluvisols, Luvisols and Nitisols were deemed highly responsive to NPK fertilizer. The risks of no response were significantly higher on soils derived from siliceous than mafic parent materials, soil types with low resilience to erosion, soils with low-activity clays and high P fixation capacity. It is concluded that maize grain yields can exceed 3 t ha-1 with high probability (ϕ > 0.80) on Andosols, Nitisols and Vertisols, but with very low probability (ϕ < 0.30) on Alisols and Arenosols. It is also concluded that across soil types and agroecological zones, the risk of no response is up to two times more on farmers’ fields than on research stations. Here, we discuss the implications of these finding for the design and location of future agronomic trials. We also provide insights to guide the targeting of fertilizer subsidies where nutrients can be more efficiently used. 2022 2022-02-15T10:35:31Z 2022-02-15T10:35:31Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118134 en Open Access application/pdf Cambridge University Press Sileshi, G.W.; Kihara, J.; Tamene, L.; Vanlauwe, B.; Phiri, E.; Jama, B. (2022) Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils. Experimental Agriculture On line First Paper (08 February 2022) 17 p. ISSN: 0014-4797
spellingShingle crop production
soil management
fertilizer application
producción vegetal
manejo del suelo
aplicación de abonos
Sileshi, Gudeta W.
Kihara, Job Maguta
Tamene, Lulseged D.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Phiri, Elijah
Jama, Bashir
Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils
title Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils
title_full Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils
title_fullStr Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils
title_full_unstemmed Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils
title_short Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils
title_sort unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied n and p fertilizers on african soils
topic crop production
soil management
fertilizer application
producción vegetal
manejo del suelo
aplicación de abonos
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/118134
work_keys_str_mv AT sileshigudetaw unravellingcausesofpoorcropresponsetoappliednandpfertilizersonafricansoils
AT kiharajobmaguta unravellingcausesofpoorcropresponsetoappliednandpfertilizersonafricansoils
AT tamenelulsegedd unravellingcausesofpoorcropresponsetoappliednandpfertilizersonafricansoils
AT vanlauwebernard unravellingcausesofpoorcropresponsetoappliednandpfertilizersonafricansoils
AT phirielijah unravellingcausesofpoorcropresponsetoappliednandpfertilizersonafricansoils
AT jamabashir unravellingcausesofpoorcropresponsetoappliednandpfertilizersonafricansoils