Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom?

The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) frames restoration as a momentous nature-based solution for achieving many of the ecological, economic, and social objectives outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals. Yet, a critical void lies at the heart of this agenda: the lack of attention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elias, Marlène, Joshi, Deepa, Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Formato: Journal Issue
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: University of Wisconsin Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117253
_version_ 1855518473230221312
author Elias, Marlène
Joshi, Deepa
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
author_browse Elias, Marlène
Joshi, Deepa
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
author_facet Elias, Marlène
Joshi, Deepa
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
author_sort Elias, Marlène
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) frames restoration as a momentous nature-based solution for achieving many of the ecological, economic, and social objectives outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals. Yet, a critical void lies at the heart of this agenda: the lack of attention to social and political dimensions of nature and restoration initiatives. At this critical juncture, urgent attention is needed to the power and politics that shape the values, meanings, and science driving restoration; and to the uneven experiences of these processes as national restoration pledges touch down in diverse and unequal contexts. In this introduction to the special issue on “Restoration for Whom, by Whom?”, we critically examine the social inclusivity of restoration agendas, policies, and practices as these unfold across ecological and geographic scales. We argue that feminist political ecology (FPE), with its focus on gendered power relations, scale integration, and historical awareness, and its critique of the commodification of nature, offers a valuable lens through which to examine the socio-political and economic dynamics of restoration. Taking an FPE perspective, we elucidate how the ten papers comprising the special issue challenge mainstream narratives of environmental sustainability and suggest more grounded and nuanced ways forward for inclusive restoration initiatives. In conclusion, we highlight the urgency of addressing the systemic fault lines that create exclusions in restoration policies and practice; and the need to legitimize the plural voices, values, situated knowledges, and paths to sustainably transform degraded landscapes.
format Journal Issue
id CGSpace117253
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher University of Wisconsin Press
publisherStr University of Wisconsin Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1172532025-02-24T06:47:17Z Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom? Elias, Marlène Joshi, Deepa Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. gender sustainable development goals sustainability political ecology inclusion social inclusion restoration The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) frames restoration as a momentous nature-based solution for achieving many of the ecological, economic, and social objectives outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals. Yet, a critical void lies at the heart of this agenda: the lack of attention to social and political dimensions of nature and restoration initiatives. At this critical juncture, urgent attention is needed to the power and politics that shape the values, meanings, and science driving restoration; and to the uneven experiences of these processes as national restoration pledges touch down in diverse and unequal contexts. In this introduction to the special issue on “Restoration for Whom, by Whom?”, we critically examine the social inclusivity of restoration agendas, policies, and practices as these unfold across ecological and geographic scales. We argue that feminist political ecology (FPE), with its focus on gendered power relations, scale integration, and historical awareness, and its critique of the commodification of nature, offers a valuable lens through which to examine the socio-political and economic dynamics of restoration. Taking an FPE perspective, we elucidate how the ten papers comprising the special issue challenge mainstream narratives of environmental sustainability and suggest more grounded and nuanced ways forward for inclusive restoration initiatives. In conclusion, we highlight the urgency of addressing the systemic fault lines that create exclusions in restoration policies and practice; and the need to legitimize the plural voices, values, situated knowledges, and paths to sustainably transform degraded landscapes. 2021-06-01 2021-12-28T03:40:06Z 2021-12-28T03:40:06Z Journal Issue https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117253 en https://doi.org/10.3368/er.39.1-2.3 https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13574 Open Access University of Wisconsin Press Elias, M.; Joshi, Deepa; Meinzen-Dick, R. 2021. Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom? Ecological Restoration 39(1-2). http://er.uwpress.org/content/39/1-2.toc
spellingShingle gender
sustainable development goals
sustainability
political ecology
inclusion
social inclusion
restoration
Elias, Marlène
Joshi, Deepa
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom?
title Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom?
title_full Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom?
title_fullStr Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom?
title_full_unstemmed Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom?
title_short Special issue: Restoration for whom, by whom?
title_sort special issue restoration for whom by whom
topic gender
sustainable development goals
sustainability
political ecology
inclusion
social inclusion
restoration
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117253
work_keys_str_mv AT eliasmarlene specialissuerestorationforwhombywhom
AT joshideepa specialissuerestorationforwhombywhom
AT meinzendickruths specialissuerestorationforwhombywhom