Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities

The networked tank/lake system of Bengaluru has been created by human intervention, with a documented history as far back as the 9th century C.E. The construction and maintenance of the tanks was overseen by local chieftains, and supported by local communities, further managed by caste-based and gen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sen, A., Unnikrishnan, H., Nagendra, H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: University of Wisconsin Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115499
_version_ 1855543280641507328
author Sen, A.
Unnikrishnan, H.
Nagendra, H.
author_browse Nagendra, H.
Sen, A.
Unnikrishnan, H.
author_facet Sen, A.
Unnikrishnan, H.
Nagendra, H.
author_sort Sen, A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The networked tank/lake system of Bengaluru has been created by human intervention, with a documented history as far back as the 9th century C.E. The construction and maintenance of the tanks was overseen by local chieftains, and supported by local communities, further managed by caste-based and gender-based systems of manual labor. With urban expansion, the lakes lost their importance as the primary sources of water, leading to large scale degradation. Land-use transformations impacted the socio-ecological commons landscape, exacerbating marginalization in nature-dependent communities such as grazers and fishers due to loss of livelihoods. State initiatives coupled with community interventions helped in revival of some lakes in the past decade, though others remain severely degraded. Privileged and underprivileged caste groups describe a very different picture of the past, demonstrating rather divergent perspectives on the way in which urbanization and lake revival has impacted their lives. Based on a case study of selected lakes in Bengaluru, we establish how social inclusions and exclusions are manifested through decision making on lake management. We also seek to understand how these hierarchies have changed in response to urbanization, with aspirations towards a rhetoric of restoration, but a focus on urban greening and recreational aesthetics in practice. The impacts of urban transition and lake revival are shaped by differing power relationships manifested within the caste hierarchy.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace115499
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher University of Wisconsin Press
publisherStr University of Wisconsin Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1154992023-03-18T14:37:23Z Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities Sen, A. Unnikrishnan, H. Nagendra, H. urban community ecological restoration The networked tank/lake system of Bengaluru has been created by human intervention, with a documented history as far back as the 9th century C.E. The construction and maintenance of the tanks was overseen by local chieftains, and supported by local communities, further managed by caste-based and gender-based systems of manual labor. With urban expansion, the lakes lost their importance as the primary sources of water, leading to large scale degradation. Land-use transformations impacted the socio-ecological commons landscape, exacerbating marginalization in nature-dependent communities such as grazers and fishers due to loss of livelihoods. State initiatives coupled with community interventions helped in revival of some lakes in the past decade, though others remain severely degraded. Privileged and underprivileged caste groups describe a very different picture of the past, demonstrating rather divergent perspectives on the way in which urbanization and lake revival has impacted their lives. Based on a case study of selected lakes in Bengaluru, we establish how social inclusions and exclusions are manifested through decision making on lake management. We also seek to understand how these hierarchies have changed in response to urbanization, with aspirations towards a rhetoric of restoration, but a focus on urban greening and recreational aesthetics in practice. The impacts of urban transition and lake revival are shaped by differing power relationships manifested within the caste hierarchy. 2021-03 2021-10-19T04:13:16Z 2021-10-19T04:13:16Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115499 en Open Access University of Wisconsin Press Sen, A., Unnikrishnan, H. and Nagendra, H., 2021. Restoration of urban water commons: Navigating social-ecological fault lines and inequities. Ecological Restoration, 39(1-2): 120-129. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.39.1-2.120
spellingShingle urban community
ecological restoration
Sen, A.
Unnikrishnan, H.
Nagendra, H.
Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities
title Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities
title_full Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities
title_fullStr Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities
title_full_unstemmed Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities
title_short Restoration of Urban Water Commons: Navigating Social-Ecological Fault Lines and Inequities
title_sort restoration of urban water commons navigating social ecological fault lines and inequities
topic urban community
ecological restoration
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115499
work_keys_str_mv AT sena restorationofurbanwatercommonsnavigatingsocialecologicalfaultlinesandinequities
AT unnikrishnanh restorationofurbanwatercommonsnavigatingsocialecologicalfaultlinesandinequities
AT nagendrah restorationofurbanwatercommonsnavigatingsocialecologicalfaultlinesandinequities