To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods

The use of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) as a soil health indicator has gained traction due to its low analysis cost and potential for high-throughput analysis. Permanganate (MnO4−) has long been proposed to fractionate soil organic matter. A methodological alteration was proposed to allow f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wade, Jordon, Li, Chongyang, Pulleman, Mirjam Margreet, Trankina, Grace, Wills, Skye, Margenot, Andrew J.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114722
_version_ 1855520016588341248
author Wade, Jordon
Li, Chongyang
Pulleman, Mirjam Margreet
Trankina, Grace
Wills, Skye
Margenot, Andrew J.
author_browse Li, Chongyang
Margenot, Andrew J.
Pulleman, Mirjam Margreet
Trankina, Grace
Wade, Jordon
Wills, Skye
author_facet Wade, Jordon
Li, Chongyang
Pulleman, Mirjam Margreet
Trankina, Grace
Wills, Skye
Margenot, Andrew J.
author_sort Wade, Jordon
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The use of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) as a soil health indicator has gained traction due to its low analysis cost and potential for high-throughput analysis. Permanganate (MnO4−) has long been proposed to fractionate soil organic matter. A methodological alteration was proposed to allow for its use as a rapid soil health indicator (POXC) is to allow the MnO4− to reach with a fixed soil mass, rather than a fixed mass of soil organic carbon (SOC). However, this modification may compromise the robustness of the results by altering the consistency of the stoichiometry in the reduction–oxidation reaction (MnO4− : SOC). Here we use a diverse set of 69 U.S. soils to evaluate whether using a fixed soil mass (2.5 g) substantively undermines the theoretical requirement of a fixed amount of SOC (15 or 25 mg SOC per sample) per unit of oxidant (MnO4−). We found that the use of a fixed SOC mass entailed a more consistent reduction of MnO4− than a fixed soil mass and also resulted in a greater range of absolute (mg kg−1) and relative POXC values (as a % of SOC) across soils. This broader range of values was not driven by large differences in the amount of MnO4− reduced per unit of SOC analyzed, but rather resulted from normalizing the amount of MnO4− reduced on a soil mass basis. The underlying distribution of MnO4− reduction did not substantively change, suggesting that the interpretation when comparing relative differences in POXC would similarly be unchanged. Unexpectedly, the use of a fixed SOC mass decreased the repeatability of the metric relative to the use of a fixed soil mass. Given the current interpretation of POXC, we see few upsides of using fixed SOC mass and several downsides (i.e. lower throughput and decreased reliability), relative to the current use of a fixed soil mass. To minimize unfounded assumptions, we further propose that POXC values be reported strictly as MnO4− reduced, specifically as μmol MnO4− reduced kg−1 soil. Our results further underscore that the results of POXC assays should be cautiously interpreted. Specifically, interpretations should be qualified by the operationally-defined nature of the POXC assay as an indirectly measured, chemically defined fraction.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace114722
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1147222024-05-01T08:16:11Z To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods Wade, Jordon Li, Chongyang Pulleman, Mirjam Margreet Trankina, Grace Wills, Skye Margenot, Andrew J. soil quality indicators organic matter permanganates research methods calidad del suelo indicadores materia orgánica permanganatos The use of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) as a soil health indicator has gained traction due to its low analysis cost and potential for high-throughput analysis. Permanganate (MnO4−) has long been proposed to fractionate soil organic matter. A methodological alteration was proposed to allow for its use as a rapid soil health indicator (POXC) is to allow the MnO4− to reach with a fixed soil mass, rather than a fixed mass of soil organic carbon (SOC). However, this modification may compromise the robustness of the results by altering the consistency of the stoichiometry in the reduction–oxidation reaction (MnO4− : SOC). Here we use a diverse set of 69 U.S. soils to evaluate whether using a fixed soil mass (2.5 g) substantively undermines the theoretical requirement of a fixed amount of SOC (15 or 25 mg SOC per sample) per unit of oxidant (MnO4−). We found that the use of a fixed SOC mass entailed a more consistent reduction of MnO4− than a fixed soil mass and also resulted in a greater range of absolute (mg kg−1) and relative POXC values (as a % of SOC) across soils. This broader range of values was not driven by large differences in the amount of MnO4− reduced per unit of SOC analyzed, but rather resulted from normalizing the amount of MnO4− reduced on a soil mass basis. The underlying distribution of MnO4− reduction did not substantively change, suggesting that the interpretation when comparing relative differences in POXC would similarly be unchanged. Unexpectedly, the use of a fixed SOC mass decreased the repeatability of the metric relative to the use of a fixed soil mass. Given the current interpretation of POXC, we see few upsides of using fixed SOC mass and several downsides (i.e. lower throughput and decreased reliability), relative to the current use of a fixed soil mass. To minimize unfounded assumptions, we further propose that POXC values be reported strictly as MnO4− reduced, specifically as μmol MnO4− reduced kg−1 soil. Our results further underscore that the results of POXC assays should be cautiously interpreted. Specifically, interpretations should be qualified by the operationally-defined nature of the POXC assay as an indirectly measured, chemically defined fraction. 2021-12 2021-08-23T10:52:46Z 2021-08-23T10:52:46Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114722 en Limited Access Elsevier Wade, J.; Li, C.; Pulleman, M.; Trankina, G.; Wills, S.; Margenot, A. (2021) To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods. Geoderma 404: 115392. ISSN: 0016-7061
spellingShingle soil quality
indicators
organic matter
permanganates
research methods
calidad del suelo
indicadores
materia orgánica
permanganatos
Wade, Jordon
Li, Chongyang
Pulleman, Mirjam Margreet
Trankina, Grace
Wills, Skye
Margenot, Andrew J.
To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods
title To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods
title_full To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods
title_fullStr To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods
title_full_unstemmed To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods
title_short To standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon? A comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay methods
title_sort to standardize by mass of soil or organic carbon a comparison of permanganate oxidizable carbon poxc assay methods
topic soil quality
indicators
organic matter
permanganates
research methods
calidad del suelo
indicadores
materia orgánica
permanganatos
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114722
work_keys_str_mv AT wadejordon tostandardizebymassofsoilororganiccarbonacomparisonofpermanganateoxidizablecarbonpoxcassaymethods
AT lichongyang tostandardizebymassofsoilororganiccarbonacomparisonofpermanganateoxidizablecarbonpoxcassaymethods
AT pullemanmirjammargreet tostandardizebymassofsoilororganiccarbonacomparisonofpermanganateoxidizablecarbonpoxcassaymethods
AT trankinagrace tostandardizebymassofsoilororganiccarbonacomparisonofpermanganateoxidizablecarbonpoxcassaymethods
AT willsskye tostandardizebymassofsoilororganiccarbonacomparisonofpermanganateoxidizablecarbonpoxcassaymethods
AT margenotandrewj tostandardizebymassofsoilororganiccarbonacomparisonofpermanganateoxidizablecarbonpoxcassaymethods