Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process

Sustainable agricultural intensification (SAI) has the potential to increase food security without detrimental effects on ecosystem services. However, adoption of SAI practices across sub-Saharan Africa has not reached transformational numbers to date. It is often hampered by lack of context-specifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winowiecki, Leigh Ann, Bourne, M., Magaju, C., Neely, C., Massawe, Boniface H.J., Masikati, Patricia, Vågen, Tor-Gunnar, Musili, F., Nabi, M., Nguyo, A., Seid, H., Hadgu, K., Shoo, A., Tembo, H., Chipatela, F., Chesterman, Sabrina, Hughes, K., Temu, E., Kimaro, Anthony A., Sinclair, Fergus L.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Informa UK Limited 2021
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114720
_version_ 1855514296475189248
author Winowiecki, Leigh Ann
Bourne, M.
Magaju, C.
Neely, C.
Massawe, Boniface H.J.
Masikati, Patricia
Vågen, Tor-Gunnar
Musili, F.
Nabi, M.
Nguyo, A.
Seid, H.
Hadgu, K.
Shoo, A.
Tembo, H.
Chipatela, F.
Chesterman, Sabrina
Hughes, K.
Temu, E.
Kimaro, Anthony A.
Sinclair, Fergus L.
author_browse Bourne, M.
Chesterman, Sabrina
Chipatela, F.
Hadgu, K.
Hughes, K.
Kimaro, Anthony A.
Magaju, C.
Masikati, Patricia
Massawe, Boniface H.J.
Musili, F.
Nabi, M.
Neely, C.
Nguyo, A.
Seid, H.
Shoo, A.
Sinclair, Fergus L.
Tembo, H.
Temu, E.
Vågen, Tor-Gunnar
Winowiecki, Leigh Ann
author_facet Winowiecki, Leigh Ann
Bourne, M.
Magaju, C.
Neely, C.
Massawe, Boniface H.J.
Masikati, Patricia
Vågen, Tor-Gunnar
Musili, F.
Nabi, M.
Nguyo, A.
Seid, H.
Hadgu, K.
Shoo, A.
Tembo, H.
Chipatela, F.
Chesterman, Sabrina
Hughes, K.
Temu, E.
Kimaro, Anthony A.
Sinclair, Fergus L.
author_sort Winowiecki, Leigh Ann
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Sustainable agricultural intensification (SAI) has the potential to increase food security without detrimental effects on ecosystem services. However, adoption of SAI practices across sub-Saharan Africa has not reached transformational numbers to date. It is often hampered by lack of context-specific practices, sub-optimal understanding of tradeoffs and synergies among stakeholders, and lack of approaches that bring diverse evidence sources together with stakeholders to collectively tackle complex problems. In this study, we asked three interconnected questions: (i) What is the accessibility and use of evidence for SAI decision making; (ii) What tools could enhance access and interaction with evidence for tradeoff analysis; and (iii) Which stakeholders must be included? This study employed a range of research and engagement methods including surveys, stakeholder analysis, participatory trade-off assessments and co-design of decision dashboards to better support evidence-based decision making in Zambia, Tanzania and Ethiopia. At the inception, SAI evidence was accessible and used by less than half of the decision makers across the three countries and online dashboards hold promise to enhance access. Many of the stakeholders working on SAI were not collaborating and tradeoff analysis was an under-utilized tool. Structured engagement across multiple stakeholder groups with evidence is critical.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace114720
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Informa UK Limited
publisherStr Informa UK Limited
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1147202024-05-01T08:15:18Z Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process Winowiecki, Leigh Ann Bourne, M. Magaju, C. Neely, C. Massawe, Boniface H.J. Masikati, Patricia Vågen, Tor-Gunnar Musili, F. Nabi, M. Nguyo, A. Seid, H. Hadgu, K. Shoo, A. Tembo, H. Chipatela, F. Chesterman, Sabrina Hughes, K. Temu, E. Kimaro, Anthony A. Sinclair, Fergus L. Sustainable agricultural intensification (SAI) has the potential to increase food security without detrimental effects on ecosystem services. However, adoption of SAI practices across sub-Saharan Africa has not reached transformational numbers to date. It is often hampered by lack of context-specific practices, sub-optimal understanding of tradeoffs and synergies among stakeholders, and lack of approaches that bring diverse evidence sources together with stakeholders to collectively tackle complex problems. In this study, we asked three interconnected questions: (i) What is the accessibility and use of evidence for SAI decision making; (ii) What tools could enhance access and interaction with evidence for tradeoff analysis; and (iii) Which stakeholders must be included? This study employed a range of research and engagement methods including surveys, stakeholder analysis, participatory trade-off assessments and co-design of decision dashboards to better support evidence-based decision making in Zambia, Tanzania and Ethiopia. At the inception, SAI evidence was accessible and used by less than half of the decision makers across the three countries and online dashboards hold promise to enhance access. Many of the stakeholders working on SAI were not collaborating and tradeoff analysis was an under-utilized tool. Structured engagement across multiple stakeholder groups with evidence is critical. 2021-11-02 2021-08-23T07:20:18Z 2021-08-23T07:20:18Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114720 en Open Access application/pdf Informa UK Limited Winowiecki, L. A.; Bourne, M.; Magaju, C.; Neely, C.; Massawe, B.; Masikati, P.; Vagen, T.; Musili, F.; Nabi, M.; Nguyo, A.; Seid, H.; Hadgu, K.; Shoo, A.; Tembo, H.; Chipatela, F.; Chesterman, S.; Hughes, K.; Temu, E.; Kimaro, A. A.; Sinclair, F. 2021. Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 24p. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2021.1897297
spellingShingle Winowiecki, Leigh Ann
Bourne, M.
Magaju, C.
Neely, C.
Massawe, Boniface H.J.
Masikati, Patricia
Vågen, Tor-Gunnar
Musili, F.
Nabi, M.
Nguyo, A.
Seid, H.
Hadgu, K.
Shoo, A.
Tembo, H.
Chipatela, F.
Chesterman, Sabrina
Hughes, K.
Temu, E.
Kimaro, Anthony A.
Sinclair, Fergus L.
Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process
title Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process
title_full Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process
title_fullStr Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process
title_full_unstemmed Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process
title_short Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process
title_sort bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114720
work_keys_str_mv AT winowieckileighann bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT bournem bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT magajuc bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT neelyc bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT massawebonifacehj bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT masikatipatricia bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT vagentorgunnar bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT musilif bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT nabim bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT nguyoa bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT seidh bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT hadguk bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT shooa bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT temboh bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT chipatelaf bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT chestermansabrina bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT hughesk bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT temue bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT kimaroanthonya bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess
AT sinclairfergusl bringingevidencetobearfornegotiatingtradeoffsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationusingastructuredstakeholderengagementprocess