Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)

Background Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam.) is an important food crop. However, the genetic information of the nuclear genome of this species is difficult to determine accurately because of its large genome and complex genetic background. This drawback has limited studies on the origin, evol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, S., Xu, P., Deng, Y., Dai, X., Zhao, L., Heider, B., Zhang, A., Zhou, Z., Cao, Q.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114713
_version_ 1855520240367042560
author Xiao, S.
Xu, P.
Deng, Y.
Dai, X.
Zhao, L.
Heider, B.
Zhang, A.
Zhou, Z.
Cao, Q.
author_browse Cao, Q.
Dai, X.
Deng, Y.
Heider, B.
Xiao, S.
Xu, P.
Zhang, A.
Zhao, L.
Zhou, Z.
author_facet Xiao, S.
Xu, P.
Deng, Y.
Dai, X.
Zhao, L.
Heider, B.
Zhang, A.
Zhou, Z.
Cao, Q.
author_sort Xiao, S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Background Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam.) is an important food crop. However, the genetic information of the nuclear genome of this species is difficult to determine accurately because of its large genome and complex genetic background. This drawback has limited studies on the origin, evolution, genetic diversity and other relevant studies on sweetpotato. Results The chloroplast genomes of 107 sweetpotato cultivars were sequenced, assembled and annotated. The resulting chloroplast genomes were comparatively analysed with the published chloroplast genomes of wild species of sweetpotato. High similarity and certain specificity were found among the chloroplast genomes of Ipomoea spp. Phylogenetic analysis could clearly distinguish wild species from cultivars. Ipomoea trifida and Ipomoea tabascana showed the closest relationship with the cultivars, and different haplotypes of ycf1 could be used to distinguish the cultivars from their wild relatives. The genetic structure was analyzed using variations in the chloroplast genome. Compared with traditional nuclear markers, the chloroplast markers designed based on the InDels on the chloroplast genome showed significant advantages. Conclusions Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of 107 cultivars and several wild species of sweetpotato was performed to help analyze the evolution, genetic structure and the development of chloroplast DNA markers of sweetpotato.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace114713
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1147132023-12-27T19:33:18Z Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) Xiao, S. Xu, P. Deng, Y. Dai, X. Zhao, L. Heider, B. Zhang, A. Zhou, Z. Cao, Q. sweet potatoes ipomoea chloroplasts genomes comparative analysis genetic structures genetics biotechnology Background Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam.) is an important food crop. However, the genetic information of the nuclear genome of this species is difficult to determine accurately because of its large genome and complex genetic background. This drawback has limited studies on the origin, evolution, genetic diversity and other relevant studies on sweetpotato. Results The chloroplast genomes of 107 sweetpotato cultivars were sequenced, assembled and annotated. The resulting chloroplast genomes were comparatively analysed with the published chloroplast genomes of wild species of sweetpotato. High similarity and certain specificity were found among the chloroplast genomes of Ipomoea spp. Phylogenetic analysis could clearly distinguish wild species from cultivars. Ipomoea trifida and Ipomoea tabascana showed the closest relationship with the cultivars, and different haplotypes of ycf1 could be used to distinguish the cultivars from their wild relatives. The genetic structure was analyzed using variations in the chloroplast genome. Compared with traditional nuclear markers, the chloroplast markers designed based on the InDels on the chloroplast genome showed significant advantages. Conclusions Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of 107 cultivars and several wild species of sweetpotato was performed to help analyze the evolution, genetic structure and the development of chloroplast DNA markers of sweetpotato. 2021-04-13 2021-08-21T05:26:36Z 2021-08-21T05:26:36Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114713 en Open Access Springer Xiao, S.; Xu, P.; Deng, Y.; Dai, X.; Zhao, L.; Heider, B.; Zhang, A.; Zhou, Z.; Cao, Q.(2021). Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam). BMC Genomics. ISSN 1471-2164. 22(1).
spellingShingle sweet potatoes
ipomoea
chloroplasts
genomes
comparative analysis
genetic structures
genetics
biotechnology
Xiao, S.
Xu, P.
Deng, Y.
Dai, X.
Zhao, L.
Heider, B.
Zhang, A.
Zhou, Z.
Cao, Q.
Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)
title Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)
title_full Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)
title_short Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam)
title_sort comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato ipomoea batatas l lam
topic sweet potatoes
ipomoea
chloroplasts
genomes
comparative analysis
genetic structures
genetics
biotechnology
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114713
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaos comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT xup comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT dengy comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT daix comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT zhaol comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT heiderb comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT zhanga comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT zhouz comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam
AT caoq comparativeanalysisofchloroplastgenomesofcultivarsandwildspeciesofsweetpotatoipomoeabatatasllam