Three approaches to restoration and their implications for social inclusion
Building on the Bonn Challenge, the UN Decade advances global restoration on an unprecedented scale. Research increasingly points to the need for greater social inclusion in restoration projects, yet the approaches that favor such inclusion remain opaque in practice. In this paper, we identify three...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
University of Wisconsin Press
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114138 |
Similar Items: Three approaches to restoration and their implications for social inclusion
- Restoration for whom, by whom? A feminist political ecology of restoration
- Módulos de aprendizaje en línea sobre el género y la inclusión social en la restauración de paisajes
- Social equity in climate-resilient agriculture
- Developing gender-equitable ecological restoration initiatives: A synthesis of guidance to improve restoration practice
- Heritable leaf traits as indicators of drought tolerance in Neltuma Alba for genetic improvement and ecological restoration
- Ten people-centered rules for socially sustainable ecosystem restoration