Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management

Conservation Agriculture (CA) and Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) have been promoted in Sub Saharan Africa as a means to improve soil quality. A four season research (March, 2017 to March, 2019) was conducted to evaluate CA-based treatment, no tillage with residue retention (NTR), ISFM-b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mutuku, E.A., Vanlauwe, Bernard, Roobroeck, D., Boeckx, P., Cornelis, Wim M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Springer 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113807
_version_ 1855529329097703424
author Mutuku, E.A.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Roobroeck, D.
Boeckx, P.
Cornelis, Wim M.
author_browse Boeckx, P.
Cornelis, Wim M.
Mutuku, E.A.
Roobroeck, D.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
author_facet Mutuku, E.A.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Roobroeck, D.
Boeckx, P.
Cornelis, Wim M.
author_sort Mutuku, E.A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Conservation Agriculture (CA) and Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) have been promoted in Sub Saharan Africa as a means to improve soil quality. A four season research (March, 2017 to March, 2019) was conducted to evaluate CA-based treatment, no tillage with residue retention (NTR), ISFM-based treatment, conventional tillage with use of manure (CTM), a combination of CA + ISFM, no tillage with residue retention and use of manure (NTRM) and a control, (C) on soil quality attributes. In the two locations (sub-humid and semi-arid) the effect of soil fertility gradients (high and low) were considered. Trials were set out using a one farm one replicate randomized design. In either high or low fertility fields, soil chemical and physical properties were significantly different between the control and NTR, CTM and NTRM with no significant differences between NTR, CTM and NTRM. SOC was higher under NTR and NTRM practices, which consequently had higher hydraulic conductivity, air permeability, mean weight diameter and available phosphorus. For all the treatments and in both locations, the low fertility fields had significantly lower agronomic use efficiency (AUE) compared to the high fertility fields. In both soil types, plant available water capacity and relative water capacity values were below the recommended thresholds indicating low soil water uptake, suboptimal microbial activity and consequently low nutrient uptake which explains the observed low AUE.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace113807
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1138072025-11-11T10:33:14Z Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management Mutuku, E.A. Vanlauwe, Bernard Roobroeck, D. Boeckx, P. Cornelis, Wim M. soil quality soil fertility conservation agriculture soil chemicophysical properties kenya agronomy Conservation Agriculture (CA) and Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) have been promoted in Sub Saharan Africa as a means to improve soil quality. A four season research (March, 2017 to March, 2019) was conducted to evaluate CA-based treatment, no tillage with residue retention (NTR), ISFM-based treatment, conventional tillage with use of manure (CTM), a combination of CA + ISFM, no tillage with residue retention and use of manure (NTRM) and a control, (C) on soil quality attributes. In the two locations (sub-humid and semi-arid) the effect of soil fertility gradients (high and low) were considered. Trials were set out using a one farm one replicate randomized design. In either high or low fertility fields, soil chemical and physical properties were significantly different between the control and NTR, CTM and NTRM with no significant differences between NTR, CTM and NTRM. SOC was higher under NTR and NTRM practices, which consequently had higher hydraulic conductivity, air permeability, mean weight diameter and available phosphorus. For all the treatments and in both locations, the low fertility fields had significantly lower agronomic use efficiency (AUE) compared to the high fertility fields. In both soil types, plant available water capacity and relative water capacity values were below the recommended thresholds indicating low soil water uptake, suboptimal microbial activity and consequently low nutrient uptake which explains the observed low AUE. 2021 2021-05-27T13:55:04Z 2021-05-27T13:55:04Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113807 en Open Access application/pdf Springer Mutuku, E.A., Vanlauwe, B., Roobroeck, D., Boeckx, P. & Cornelis, W.M. (2021). Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1-17.
spellingShingle soil quality
soil fertility
conservation agriculture
soil chemicophysical properties
kenya
agronomy
Mutuku, E.A.
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Roobroeck, D.
Boeckx, P.
Cornelis, Wim M.
Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management
title Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management
title_full Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management
title_fullStr Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management
title_full_unstemmed Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management
title_short Physico-chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management
title_sort physico chemical soil attributes under conservation agriculture and integrated soil fertility management
topic soil quality
soil fertility
conservation agriculture
soil chemicophysical properties
kenya
agronomy
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113807
work_keys_str_mv AT mutukuea physicochemicalsoilattributesunderconservationagricultureandintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT vanlauwebernard physicochemicalsoilattributesunderconservationagricultureandintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT roobroeckd physicochemicalsoilattributesunderconservationagricultureandintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT boeckxp physicochemicalsoilattributesunderconservationagricultureandintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement
AT corneliswimm physicochemicalsoilattributesunderconservationagricultureandintegratedsoilfertilitymanagement