Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes

Sustainable management of resources is crucial for balancing competing livelihood, economic, and environmental goals. Since forests and other systems do not exist in isolation, comprehensive jurisdictional approaches to forest, and land-use governance can help promote sustainability. The ability of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peteru, S., Duchelle, Amy E., Stickler, C., Durbin, J., Luque, C., Komalasari, M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Frontiers Media 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113088
_version_ 1855528563681263616
author Peteru, S.
Duchelle, Amy E.
Stickler, C.
Durbin, J.
Luque, C.
Komalasari, M.
author_browse Duchelle, Amy E.
Durbin, J.
Komalasari, M.
Luque, C.
Peteru, S.
Stickler, C.
author_facet Peteru, S.
Duchelle, Amy E.
Stickler, C.
Durbin, J.
Luque, C.
Komalasari, M.
author_sort Peteru, S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Sustainable management of resources is crucial for balancing competing livelihood, economic, and environmental goals. Since forests and other systems do not exist in isolation, comprehensive jurisdictional approaches to forest, and land-use governance can help promote sustainability. The ability of jurisdictions to provide evidence of progress toward sustainability is essential for attracting public and private sector investments and maintaining local stakeholder involvement. The Sustainable Landscapes Rating Tool (SLRT) provides a way to assess enabling conditions for jurisdictional sustainability through an evidence-based rating system. We applied this rating tool in 19 states and provinces across six countries (Brazil, Ecuador, Indonesia, Cote d'Ivoire, Mexico, Peru) that are members of the Governors' Climate and Forests Task Force (GCF TF). Each SLRT assessment was completed using publicly available information, interviews with stakeholders in the jurisdiction, and a multi-stakeholder workshop to validate the indicator ratings. This paper explores the effects of stakeholder involvement in the validation process, along with stakeholder perceptions of the tool's usefulness. Our analysis shows that the validation workshops often led to modifications of the indicator ratings, even for indicators originally assessed using publicly available data, highlighting the gap between existence of a policy and its implementation. Also, a more diverse composition of stakeholders at the workshops led to more changes in indicator ratings, which indicates the importance of including different perspectives in compiling and validating the assessments. Overall, most participants agreed that the tool is useful for self-assessment of the jurisdiction and to address coordination gaps. Further, the validation workshops provided a space for discussions across government agencies, civil society organizations (CSOs), producer organizations, indigenous peoples and local community representatives, and researchers about improving policy and governance conditions. Our findings from the analysis of a participatory approach to collecting and validating data can be used to inform future research on environmental governance and sustainability.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace113088
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Frontiers Media
publisherStr Frontiers Media
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1130882024-06-26T09:37:12Z Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes Peteru, S. Duchelle, Amy E. Stickler, C. Durbin, J. Luque, C. Komalasari, M. environmental policy stakeholders national planning landscape conservation data analysis Sustainable management of resources is crucial for balancing competing livelihood, economic, and environmental goals. Since forests and other systems do not exist in isolation, comprehensive jurisdictional approaches to forest, and land-use governance can help promote sustainability. The ability of jurisdictions to provide evidence of progress toward sustainability is essential for attracting public and private sector investments and maintaining local stakeholder involvement. The Sustainable Landscapes Rating Tool (SLRT) provides a way to assess enabling conditions for jurisdictional sustainability through an evidence-based rating system. We applied this rating tool in 19 states and provinces across six countries (Brazil, Ecuador, Indonesia, Cote d'Ivoire, Mexico, Peru) that are members of the Governors' Climate and Forests Task Force (GCF TF). Each SLRT assessment was completed using publicly available information, interviews with stakeholders in the jurisdiction, and a multi-stakeholder workshop to validate the indicator ratings. This paper explores the effects of stakeholder involvement in the validation process, along with stakeholder perceptions of the tool's usefulness. Our analysis shows that the validation workshops often led to modifications of the indicator ratings, even for indicators originally assessed using publicly available data, highlighting the gap between existence of a policy and its implementation. Also, a more diverse composition of stakeholders at the workshops led to more changes in indicator ratings, which indicates the importance of including different perspectives in compiling and validating the assessments. Overall, most participants agreed that the tool is useful for self-assessment of the jurisdiction and to address coordination gaps. Further, the validation workshops provided a space for discussions across government agencies, civil society organizations (CSOs), producer organizations, indigenous peoples and local community representatives, and researchers about improving policy and governance conditions. Our findings from the analysis of a participatory approach to collecting and validating data can be used to inform future research on environmental governance and sustainability. 2021-03-12 2021-03-23T06:44:37Z 2021-03-23T06:44:37Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113088 en Open Access Frontiers Media Peteru, S., Duchelle, A.E., Stickler, C., Durbin, J., Luque, C. and Komalasari, M. (2021) Participatory Use of a Tool to Assess Governance for Sustainable Landscapes. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4: 507443. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.507443
spellingShingle environmental policy
stakeholders
national planning
landscape conservation
data analysis
Peteru, S.
Duchelle, Amy E.
Stickler, C.
Durbin, J.
Luque, C.
Komalasari, M.
Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes
title Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes
title_full Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes
title_fullStr Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes
title_full_unstemmed Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes
title_short Participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes
title_sort participatory use of a tool to assess governance for sustainable landscapes
topic environmental policy
stakeholders
national planning
landscape conservation
data analysis
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113088
work_keys_str_mv AT peterus participatoryuseofatooltoassessgovernanceforsustainablelandscapes
AT duchelleamye participatoryuseofatooltoassessgovernanceforsustainablelandscapes
AT sticklerc participatoryuseofatooltoassessgovernanceforsustainablelandscapes
AT durbinj participatoryuseofatooltoassessgovernanceforsustainablelandscapes
AT luquec participatoryuseofatooltoassessgovernanceforsustainablelandscapes
AT komalasarim participatoryuseofatooltoassessgovernanceforsustainablelandscapes