Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species

Background: Miscanthus is a commercial lignocellulosic biomass crop owing to its high biomass productivity, resilience and photosynthetic capacity at low temperature. These qualities make Miscanthus a particularly good candidate for temperate marginal land, where yields can be limited by insufficien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vega, J.J. de, Teshome, Abel, Klaas, M., Grant, J., Finnan, J., Barth, S.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112973
_version_ 1855518839960240128
author Vega, J.J. de
Teshome, Abel
Klaas, M.
Grant, J.
Finnan, J.
Barth, S.
author_browse Barth, S.
Finnan, J.
Grant, J.
Klaas, M.
Teshome, Abel
Vega, J.J. de
author_facet Vega, J.J. de
Teshome, Abel
Klaas, M.
Grant, J.
Finnan, J.
Barth, S.
author_sort Vega, J.J. de
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Background: Miscanthus is a commercial lignocellulosic biomass crop owing to its high biomass productivity, resilience and photosynthetic capacity at low temperature. These qualities make Miscanthus a particularly good candidate for temperate marginal land, where yields can be limited by insufficient or excessive water supply. Differences in response to water stress have been observed among Miscanthus species, which correlated to origin. In this study, we compared the physiological and molecular responses among Miscanthus species under excessive (flooded) and insufficient (drought) water supply in glasshouse conditions. Results: A significant biomass loss was observed under drought conditions in all genotypes. M. x giganteus showed a lower reduction in biomass yield under drought conditions compared to the control than the other species. Under flooded conditions, biomass yield was as good as or better than control conditions in all species. 4389 of the 67,789 genes (6.4%) in the reference genome were differentially expressed during drought among four Miscanthus genotypes from different species. We observed the same biological processes were regulated across Miscanthus species during drought stress despite the DEGs being not similar. Upregulated differentially expressed genes were significantly involved in sucrose and starch metabolism, redox, and water and glycerol homeostasis and channel activity. Multiple copies of the starch metabolic enzymes BAM and waxy GBSS-I were strongly up-regulated in drought stress in all Miscanthus genotypes, and 12 aquaporins (PIP1, PIP2 and NIP2) were also up-regulated in drought stress across genotypes. Conclusions: Different phenotypic responses were observed during drought stress among Miscanthus genotypes from different species, supporting differences in genetic adaption. The low number of DEGs and higher biomass yield in flooded conditions supported Miscanthus use in flooded land. The molecular processes regulated during drought were shared among Miscanthus species and consistent with functional categories known to be critical during drought stress in model organisms. However, differences in the regulated genes, likely associated with ploidy and heterosis, highlighted the value of exploring its diversity for breeding.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace112973
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1129732026-01-26T17:03:07Z Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species Vega, J.J. de Teshome, Abel Klaas, M. Grant, J. Finnan, J. Barth, S. animal feeding crops drought water biotechnology Background: Miscanthus is a commercial lignocellulosic biomass crop owing to its high biomass productivity, resilience and photosynthetic capacity at low temperature. These qualities make Miscanthus a particularly good candidate for temperate marginal land, where yields can be limited by insufficient or excessive water supply. Differences in response to water stress have been observed among Miscanthus species, which correlated to origin. In this study, we compared the physiological and molecular responses among Miscanthus species under excessive (flooded) and insufficient (drought) water supply in glasshouse conditions. Results: A significant biomass loss was observed under drought conditions in all genotypes. M. x giganteus showed a lower reduction in biomass yield under drought conditions compared to the control than the other species. Under flooded conditions, biomass yield was as good as or better than control conditions in all species. 4389 of the 67,789 genes (6.4%) in the reference genome were differentially expressed during drought among four Miscanthus genotypes from different species. We observed the same biological processes were regulated across Miscanthus species during drought stress despite the DEGs being not similar. Upregulated differentially expressed genes were significantly involved in sucrose and starch metabolism, redox, and water and glycerol homeostasis and channel activity. Multiple copies of the starch metabolic enzymes BAM and waxy GBSS-I were strongly up-regulated in drought stress in all Miscanthus genotypes, and 12 aquaporins (PIP1, PIP2 and NIP2) were also up-regulated in drought stress across genotypes. Conclusions: Different phenotypic responses were observed during drought stress among Miscanthus genotypes from different species, supporting differences in genetic adaption. The low number of DEGs and higher biomass yield in flooded conditions supported Miscanthus use in flooded land. The molecular processes regulated during drought were shared among Miscanthus species and consistent with functional categories known to be critical during drought stress in model organisms. However, differences in the regulated genes, likely associated with ploidy and heterosis, highlighted the value of exploring its diversity for breeding. 2021-12 2021-03-11T13:00:04Z 2021-03-11T13:00:04Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112973 en Open Access application/pdf Springer De Vega, J.J., Teshome, A., Klaas, M., Grant, J., Finnan, J. and Barth, S. 2021. Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species. Biotechnology for Biofuels 14:60.
spellingShingle animal feeding
crops
drought
water
biotechnology
Vega, J.J. de
Teshome, Abel
Klaas, M.
Grant, J.
Finnan, J.
Barth, S.
Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species
title Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species
title_full Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species
title_fullStr Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species
title_full_unstemmed Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species
title_short Physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass Miscanthus species
title_sort physiological and transcriptional response to drought stress among bioenergy grass miscanthus species
topic animal feeding
crops
drought
water
biotechnology
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112973
work_keys_str_mv AT vegajjde physiologicalandtranscriptionalresponsetodroughtstressamongbioenergygrassmiscanthusspecies
AT teshomeabel physiologicalandtranscriptionalresponsetodroughtstressamongbioenergygrassmiscanthusspecies
AT klaasm physiologicalandtranscriptionalresponsetodroughtstressamongbioenergygrassmiscanthusspecies
AT grantj physiologicalandtranscriptionalresponsetodroughtstressamongbioenergygrassmiscanthusspecies
AT finnanj physiologicalandtranscriptionalresponsetodroughtstressamongbioenergygrassmiscanthusspecies
AT barths physiologicalandtranscriptionalresponsetodroughtstressamongbioenergygrassmiscanthusspecies