Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives
Sustainability agendas increasingly recognize that attaining conservation and development outcomes demands greater integration across sectors. Integrated landscape initiatives (ILIs) are a leading approach to reconciling multiple objectives. However, a characterization of the diversity of approaches...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112681 |
| _version_ | 1855521802621550592 |
|---|---|
| author | Carmenta, R. Coomes, David A. DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. Hart, A.K. Harvey, C.A. Milder, J. Reed, J. Vira, B. Estrada-Carmona, Natalia |
| author_browse | Carmenta, R. Coomes, David A. DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. Estrada-Carmona, Natalia Hart, A.K. Harvey, C.A. Milder, J. Reed, J. Vira, B. |
| author_facet | Carmenta, R. Coomes, David A. DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. Hart, A.K. Harvey, C.A. Milder, J. Reed, J. Vira, B. Estrada-Carmona, Natalia |
| author_sort | Carmenta, R. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Sustainability agendas increasingly recognize that attaining conservation and development outcomes demands greater integration across sectors. Integrated landscape initiatives (ILIs) are a leading approach to reconciling multiple objectives. However, a characterization of the diversity of approaches under the ILI umbrella and the comparative performance of different types of approach is lacking. Here, we analyze questionnaire data obtained from project proponents to delimit four particular types of ILI: one type was dominated by agricultural interventions and another by conservation interventions, and these partially integrated ILIs engage local scales of governance; the remaining two types exhibit strong integration, with aims and actions across multiple sectors and scales of governance. We show that integrated projects were deemed to be more successful by project proponents. The typology offers the practitioner and research community an explicit set of strategies for selection, evaluation, and support and attests to the need for integration to achieve sustainable outcomes. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace112681 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1126812025-09-25T13:01:37Z Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives Carmenta, R. Coomes, David A. DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. Hart, A.K. Harvey, C.A. Milder, J. Reed, J. Vira, B. Estrada-Carmona, Natalia landscape biodiversity conservation sustainable development Sustainability agendas increasingly recognize that attaining conservation and development outcomes demands greater integration across sectors. Integrated landscape initiatives (ILIs) are a leading approach to reconciling multiple objectives. However, a characterization of the diversity of approaches under the ILI umbrella and the comparative performance of different types of approach is lacking. Here, we analyze questionnaire data obtained from project proponents to delimit four particular types of ILI: one type was dominated by agricultural interventions and another by conservation interventions, and these partially integrated ILIs engage local scales of governance; the remaining two types exhibit strong integration, with aims and actions across multiple sectors and scales of governance. We show that integrated projects were deemed to be more successful by project proponents. The typology offers the practitioner and research community an explicit set of strategies for selection, evaluation, and support and attests to the need for integration to achieve sustainable outcomes. 2020-02 2021-03-08T08:46:41Z 2021-03-08T08:46:41Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112681 en Open Access Elsevier Carmenta, R., Coomes, D.A., DeClerck, F.A.J., Hart, A.K., Harvey, C.A., Milder, J., Reed, J., Vira, B., Estrada Carmona, N. 2020. Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives. One Earth, 2 (2): 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.009 |
| spellingShingle | landscape biodiversity conservation sustainable development Carmenta, R. Coomes, David A. DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. Hart, A.K. Harvey, C.A. Milder, J. Reed, J. Vira, B. Estrada-Carmona, Natalia Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
| title | Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
| title_full | Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
| title_fullStr | Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
| title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
| title_short | Characterizing and Evaluating Integrated Landscape Initiatives |
| title_sort | characterizing and evaluating integrated landscape initiatives |
| topic | landscape biodiversity conservation sustainable development |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112681 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carmentar characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT coomesdavida characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT declerckfabriceaj characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT hartak characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT harveyca characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT milderj characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT reedj characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT virab characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives AT estradacarmonanatalia characterizingandevaluatingintegratedlandscapeinitiatives |