Inter-sectoral and multilevel coordination alone do not reduce deforestation and advance environmental justice: Why bold contestation works when collaboration fails
Policy makers, academics, and conservationists often posit that poor coordination between different land use sectors, and between levels of governance, as an underlying challenge for reducing deforestation and forest degradation. This paper analyzes this argument using data from interviews with over...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112339 |
Ejemplares similares: Inter-sectoral and multilevel coordination alone do not reduce deforestation and advance environmental justice: Why bold contestation works when collaboration fails
- Can multilevel governance transform business-as-usual trajectories driving deforestation? Lessons for REDD+ and beyond
- Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development
- Analyzing multilevel governance in Mexico: Lessons for REDD+ from a study of land-use change and benefit sharing in Chiapas and Yucatán
- Institutional dimensions of the just energy transition: reflecting the role of energy justice in public administration
- Multilevel governance and land use in Chiapas and Yucatan: Lessons for REDD+ in Mexico
- When policymakers add administrative burdens while expanding access