Messiness of forest governance: How technical approaches suppress politics in REDD+ and conservation projects
Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) was originally conceived to address the global problem of climate change by reducing deforestation and forest degradation at national and subnational levels in developing countries. Since its inception, REDD+ proponents have in...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112227 |
Ejemplares similares: Messiness of forest governance: How technical approaches suppress politics in REDD+ and conservation projects
- Beyond the technical: The politics of developing the MRV system in Peru
- The legitimacy of multilevel governance structures for benefit sharing: REDD+ and other low emissions options in Peru
- Can multilevel governance transform business-as-usual trajectories driving deforestation? Lessons for REDD+ and beyond
- The distribution of powers and responsibilities affecting forests, land use, and REDD+ across levels and sectors in Vietnam: A legal study
- Analyzing multilevel governance in Peru: Lessons for REDD+ from the study of land-use change and benefit sharing in Madre de Dios, Ucayali and San Martin
- Building future scenarios: Governance, land use and carbon management at the landscape scale