A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) “Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact”
Hansson and Polk (2018, Research Evaluation, 27/2: 132–44) aim to assess the usefulness of the concepts of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact in transdisciplinary (TD) research. However, the article misrepresents some of the ideas in the two...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/111881 |
Similar Items: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) “Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact”
- Linking transdisciplinary research characteristics and quality to effectiveness: A comparative analysis of five research-for-development projects
- How to build Theories of Change for transdisciplinary research: Guidance and considerations
- A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research
- Leading inter- and transdisciplinary research: Lessons from applying theories of change to a strategic research program
- The legitimacy of precision livestock farming
- Improving credibility and transparency of conservation impact evaluations through the partial identification approach