Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia
Community-based forestry (CBF) has been promoted as a potential win-win solution for improving forest conservation and livelihood outcomes. Incorporating location-specific factors from participants’ perspectives in the design and implementation of CBF has been noted as an important prerequisite for...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/111702 |
| _version_ | 1855527040368771072 |
|---|---|
| author | Putraditama, A. Kim, Y.-S. Baral, H. |
| author_browse | Baral, H. Kim, Y.-S. Putraditama, A. |
| author_facet | Putraditama, A. Kim, Y.-S. Baral, H. |
| author_sort | Putraditama, A. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Community-based forestry (CBF) has been promoted as a potential win-win solution for improving forest conservation and livelihood outcomes. Incorporating location-specific factors from participants’ perspectives in the design and implementation of CBF has been noted as an important prerequisite for ensuring positive outcomes. This study investigates benefits and challenges of CBF perceived by participating farmers in two Community Forests (HKM – Hutan Kemasyarakatan) in Lampung, Indonesia. Two sites were chosen systematically based on their distinct biophysical characteristics. Through qualitative assessments using interviews and focus group discussions with the farmers, we found that securing land tenure is the most important motivation for them to participate in CBF and abide by the government-imposed rules and regulations. Participants in both sites have experienced increased income, as well as other benefits, such as reduced fire incidents and illegal activities. However, benefits and challenges that the two HKMs face differ and are affected by their biophysical features, such as elevation, slope, proximity to village and roads. Participants, especially in the remote HKM in high elevation, perceive long-term and poorly monitored goals, such as reforestation, unrealistic. Site-specific and targeted technical supports are needed to identify overstory tree species that can also provide livelihood benefits. We argue for explicit considerations of biophysical features for CBF site designations and technical supports that meet site specific needs. This study provides a practical pathway to ensure economic benefits of CBF, which is an important factor for promoting CBF's success. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace111702 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1117022025-11-12T05:31:27Z Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia Putraditama, A. Kim, Y.-S. Baral, H. community forestry conservation livelihoods social forestry Community-based forestry (CBF) has been promoted as a potential win-win solution for improving forest conservation and livelihood outcomes. Incorporating location-specific factors from participants’ perspectives in the design and implementation of CBF has been noted as an important prerequisite for ensuring positive outcomes. This study investigates benefits and challenges of CBF perceived by participating farmers in two Community Forests (HKM – Hutan Kemasyarakatan) in Lampung, Indonesia. Two sites were chosen systematically based on their distinct biophysical characteristics. Through qualitative assessments using interviews and focus group discussions with the farmers, we found that securing land tenure is the most important motivation for them to participate in CBF and abide by the government-imposed rules and regulations. Participants in both sites have experienced increased income, as well as other benefits, such as reduced fire incidents and illegal activities. However, benefits and challenges that the two HKMs face differ and are affected by their biophysical features, such as elevation, slope, proximity to village and roads. Participants, especially in the remote HKM in high elevation, perceive long-term and poorly monitored goals, such as reforestation, unrealistic. Site-specific and targeted technical supports are needed to identify overstory tree species that can also provide livelihood benefits. We argue for explicit considerations of biophysical features for CBF site designations and technical supports that meet site specific needs. This study provides a practical pathway to ensure economic benefits of CBF, which is an important factor for promoting CBF's success. 2021-06 2021-03-02T09:02:58Z 2021-03-02T09:02:58Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/111702 en Open Access application/pdf Elsevier Putraditama, A., Kim, Y.-S. and Baral, H. 2021. Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia. Trees, Forests and People, 4: 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100062. |
| spellingShingle | community forestry conservation livelihoods social forestry Putraditama, A. Kim, Y.-S. Baral, H. Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia |
| title | Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia |
| title_full | Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia |
| title_fullStr | Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia |
| title_short | Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia |
| title_sort | where to put community based forestry reconciling conservation and livelihood in lampung indonesia |
| topic | community forestry conservation livelihoods social forestry |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/111702 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT putraditamaa wheretoputcommunitybasedforestryreconcilingconservationandlivelihoodinlampungindonesia AT kimys wheretoputcommunitybasedforestryreconcilingconservationandlivelihoodinlampungindonesia AT baralh wheretoputcommunitybasedforestryreconcilingconservationandlivelihoodinlampungindonesia |