Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals

Hospitals in Kenya continue to use the Febrile Antigen Brucella Agglutination Test (FBAT) to diagnose brucellosis, despite reports showing its inadequacy. This study generated hospital-based evidence on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the FBAT, compared to the Rose Bengal Test (RBT).Twelve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alumasa, Lorren, Thomas, Lian F., Amanya, Fredrick, Njoroge, Samuel M., Moriyón, I., Makhandia, Josiah, Rushton, Jonathan, Fèvre, Eric M., Falzon, Laura C.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110774
_version_ 1855541061038899200
author Alumasa, Lorren
Thomas, Lian F.
Amanya, Fredrick
Njoroge, Samuel M.
Moriyón, I.
Makhandia, Josiah
Rushton, Jonathan
Fèvre, Eric M.
Falzon, Laura C.
author_browse Alumasa, Lorren
Amanya, Fredrick
Falzon, Laura C.
Fèvre, Eric M.
Makhandia, Josiah
Moriyón, I.
Njoroge, Samuel M.
Rushton, Jonathan
Thomas, Lian F.
author_facet Alumasa, Lorren
Thomas, Lian F.
Amanya, Fredrick
Njoroge, Samuel M.
Moriyón, I.
Makhandia, Josiah
Rushton, Jonathan
Fèvre, Eric M.
Falzon, Laura C.
author_sort Alumasa, Lorren
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Hospitals in Kenya continue to use the Febrile Antigen Brucella Agglutination Test (FBAT) to diagnose brucellosis, despite reports showing its inadequacy. This study generated hospital-based evidence on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the FBAT, compared to the Rose Bengal Test (RBT).Twelve hospitals in western Kenya stored patient serum samples that were tested for brucellosis using the FBAT, and these were later re-tested using the RBT. Data on the running time and cost of the FBAT, and the treatment prescribed for brucellosis, were collected. The cost-effectiveness of the two tests, defined as the cost in US Dollars ($) per Disability Adjusted Life Year (DALY) averted, was determined, and a basic sensitivity analysis was run to identify the most influential parameters. Over a 6-month period, 180 patient serum samples that were tested with FBAT at the hospitals were later re-tested with RBT at the field laboratory. Of these 24 (13.3%) and 3 (1.7%) tested positive with FBAT and RBT, respectively. The agreement between the FBAT and RBT was slight (Kappa = 0.12). Treatment prescribed following FBAT positivity varied between hospitals, and only one hospital prescribed a standardized therapy regimen. The mean $/DALY averted when using the FBAT and RBT were $2,065 (95% CI $481-$6,736) and $304 (95% CI $126-$604), respectively. Brucellosis prevalence was the most influential parameter in the cost-effectiveness of both tests. Extrapolation to the national level suggested that an estimated $338,891 (95% CI $47,000-$1,149,000) per year is currently spent unnecessarily treating those falsely testing positive by FBAT. These findings highlight the potential for misdiagnosis using the FBAT. Furthermore, the RBT is cost-effective, and could be considered as the mainstay screening test for human brucellosis in this setting. Lastly, the treatment regimens must be harmonized to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics for treatment.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace110774
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
publisherStr Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1107742025-12-08T10:11:39Z Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals Alumasa, Lorren Thomas, Lian F. Amanya, Fredrick Njoroge, Samuel M. Moriyón, I. Makhandia, Josiah Rushton, Jonathan Fèvre, Eric M. Falzon, Laura C. brucellosis diagnosis zoonoses health Hospitals in Kenya continue to use the Febrile Antigen Brucella Agglutination Test (FBAT) to diagnose brucellosis, despite reports showing its inadequacy. This study generated hospital-based evidence on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the FBAT, compared to the Rose Bengal Test (RBT).Twelve hospitals in western Kenya stored patient serum samples that were tested for brucellosis using the FBAT, and these were later re-tested using the RBT. Data on the running time and cost of the FBAT, and the treatment prescribed for brucellosis, were collected. The cost-effectiveness of the two tests, defined as the cost in US Dollars ($) per Disability Adjusted Life Year (DALY) averted, was determined, and a basic sensitivity analysis was run to identify the most influential parameters. Over a 6-month period, 180 patient serum samples that were tested with FBAT at the hospitals were later re-tested with RBT at the field laboratory. Of these 24 (13.3%) and 3 (1.7%) tested positive with FBAT and RBT, respectively. The agreement between the FBAT and RBT was slight (Kappa = 0.12). Treatment prescribed following FBAT positivity varied between hospitals, and only one hospital prescribed a standardized therapy regimen. The mean $/DALY averted when using the FBAT and RBT were $2,065 (95% CI $481-$6,736) and $304 (95% CI $126-$604), respectively. Brucellosis prevalence was the most influential parameter in the cost-effectiveness of both tests. Extrapolation to the national level suggested that an estimated $338,891 (95% CI $47,000-$1,149,000) per year is currently spent unnecessarily treating those falsely testing positive by FBAT. These findings highlight the potential for misdiagnosis using the FBAT. Furthermore, the RBT is cost-effective, and could be considered as the mainstay screening test for human brucellosis in this setting. Lastly, the treatment regimens must be harmonized to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics for treatment. 2021-01-07 2021-01-09T16:07:16Z 2021-01-09T16:07:16Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110774 en Open Access Public Library of Science Alumasa, L., Thomas, L.F., Amanya, F., Njoroge, S.M., Moriyón, I., Makhandia, J., Rushton, J., Fèvre, E.M. and Falzon, L.C. 2021. Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15(1): e0008977.
spellingShingle brucellosis
diagnosis
zoonoses
health
Alumasa, Lorren
Thomas, Lian F.
Amanya, Fredrick
Njoroge, Samuel M.
Moriyón, I.
Makhandia, Josiah
Rushton, Jonathan
Fèvre, Eric M.
Falzon, Laura C.
Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals
title Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals
title_full Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals
title_fullStr Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals
title_short Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals
title_sort hospital based evidence on cost effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in kenyan hospitals
topic brucellosis
diagnosis
zoonoses
health
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110774
work_keys_str_mv AT alumasalorren hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT thomaslianf hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT amanyafredrick hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT njorogesamuelm hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT moriyoni hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT makhandiajosiah hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT rushtonjonathan hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT fevreericm hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals
AT falzonlaurac hospitalbasedevidenceoncosteffectivenessofbrucellosisdiagnostictestsandtreatmentinkenyanhospitals