Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an extremely infectious viral infection of cloven-hoofed animals which is highly challenging to control and can give rise to national animal health crises, especially if there is a lack of pre-existing immunity due to the emergence of new strains or following incursio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sumption, Keith J., Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D., McLaws, M., Paton, D.J.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110070
_version_ 1855540270168276992
author Sumption, Keith J.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
McLaws, M.
Paton, D.J.
author_browse Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
McLaws, M.
Paton, D.J.
Sumption, Keith J.
author_facet Sumption, Keith J.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
McLaws, M.
Paton, D.J.
author_sort Sumption, Keith J.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an extremely infectious viral infection of cloven-hoofed animals which is highly challenging to control and can give rise to national animal health crises, especially if there is a lack of pre-existing immunity due to the emergence of new strains or following incursions into disease-free regions. The 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK was on a scale that initially overwhelmed the national veterinary services and was eventually controlled by livestock lockdown and slaughter on an unprecedented scale. In 2020, the rapid emergence of COVID-19 has led to a human pandemic unparalleled in living memory. The enormous logistics of multi-agency control efforts for COVID-19 are reminiscent of the 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK, as are the use of movement restrictions, not normally a feature of human disease control. The UK experience is internationally relevant as few countries have experienced national epidemic crises for both diseases. In this review, we reflect on the experiences and lessons learnt from UK and international responses to FMD and COVID-19 with respect to their management, including the challenge of preclinical viral transmission, threat awareness, early detection, different interpretations of scientific information, lockdown, biosecurity behaviour change, shortage of testing capacity and the choices for eradication versus living with infection. A major lesson is that the similarity of issues and critical resources needed to manage large-scale outbreaks demonstrates that there is benefit to a 'One Health' approach to preparedness, with potential for greater cooperation in planning and the consideration of shared critical resources.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace110070
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Royal Society
publisherStr Royal Society
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1100702025-01-06T09:43:39Z Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference Sumption, Keith J. Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D. McLaws, M. Paton, D.J. covid-19 foot and mouth disease disease control Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an extremely infectious viral infection of cloven-hoofed animals which is highly challenging to control and can give rise to national animal health crises, especially if there is a lack of pre-existing immunity due to the emergence of new strains or following incursions into disease-free regions. The 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK was on a scale that initially overwhelmed the national veterinary services and was eventually controlled by livestock lockdown and slaughter on an unprecedented scale. In 2020, the rapid emergence of COVID-19 has led to a human pandemic unparalleled in living memory. The enormous logistics of multi-agency control efforts for COVID-19 are reminiscent of the 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK, as are the use of movement restrictions, not normally a feature of human disease control. The UK experience is internationally relevant as few countries have experienced national epidemic crises for both diseases. In this review, we reflect on the experiences and lessons learnt from UK and international responses to FMD and COVID-19 with respect to their management, including the challenge of preclinical viral transmission, threat awareness, early detection, different interpretations of scientific information, lockdown, biosecurity behaviour change, shortage of testing capacity and the choices for eradication versus living with infection. A major lesson is that the similarity of issues and critical resources needed to manage large-scale outbreaks demonstrates that there is benefit to a 'One Health' approach to preparedness, with potential for greater cooperation in planning and the consideration of shared critical resources. 2020-11-11 2020-11-05T09:29:11Z 2020-11-05T09:29:11Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110070 en Open Access Royal Society Sumption, K., Knight-Jones, T.J.D., McLaws, M. and Paton, D.J. 2020. Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B–Biological Sciences 287: 20200906.
spellingShingle covid-19
foot and mouth disease
disease control
Sumption, Keith J.
Knight-Jones, Theodore J.D.
McLaws, M.
Paton, D.J.
Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference
title Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference
title_full Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference
title_fullStr Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference
title_full_unstemmed Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference
title_short Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference
title_sort parallels differences and lessons a comparison of the management of foot and mouth disease and covid 19 using uk 2001 2020 as points of reference
topic covid-19
foot and mouth disease
disease control
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/110070
work_keys_str_mv AT sumptionkeithj parallelsdifferencesandlessonsacomparisonofthemanagementoffootandmouthdiseaseandcovid19usinguk20012020aspointsofreference
AT knightjonestheodorejd parallelsdifferencesandlessonsacomparisonofthemanagementoffootandmouthdiseaseandcovid19usinguk20012020aspointsofreference
AT mclawsm parallelsdifferencesandlessonsacomparisonofthemanagementoffootandmouthdiseaseandcovid19usinguk20012020aspointsofreference
AT patondj parallelsdifferencesandlessonsacomparisonofthemanagementoffootandmouthdiseaseandcovid19usinguk20012020aspointsofreference