Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam

Barrier analysis is completed with at least 45 doers of the behavior of interest and 45 non-doers who do not practice the behaviour. In this case, the behaviour of interest was the consumption of an adequate quantity and diversity of fruits and vegetables by low income adults in the focal neighbourh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truong, Mai, Kennedy, Gina, Tran, Thanh Do, Phuong, Ngothiha, Nguyen, Huu Bac
Formato: Conjunto de datos
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Bioversity International 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109502
_version_ 1855521453622951936
author Truong, Mai
Kennedy, Gina
Tran, Thanh Do
Phuong, Ngothiha
Nguyen, Huu Bac
author_browse Kennedy, Gina
Nguyen, Huu Bac
Phuong, Ngothiha
Tran, Thanh Do
Truong, Mai
author_facet Truong, Mai
Kennedy, Gina
Tran, Thanh Do
Phuong, Ngothiha
Nguyen, Huu Bac
author_sort Truong, Mai
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Barrier analysis is completed with at least 45 doers of the behavior of interest and 45 non-doers who do not practice the behaviour. In this case, the behaviour of interest was the consumption of an adequate quantity and diversity of fruits and vegetables by low income adults in the focal neighbourhoods. Doers and non-doers were selected from the list of 300 lower-income households in the focal neighborhoods using screening questions. Respondents were asked to recount the fruits and vegetables they consumed in the past 24 hours and whether the amount they consumed was typical for them or not. Trained enumerators from NIN converted the reported serving sizes into an approximate number of grams using standardized conversion factors. Based on the answers to the screening questions, the respondents were classified as ‘doers’, ‘non-doers’ or ‘do not interview’. Doers met fruit target (200 g fruit) and vegetable target (200g vegetable from at least two MDDW groups) and normally consumed the same amount of fruits and vegetables or more. Nondoers did not meet the fruit target, did not meet the vegetable target and normally consume the same amount or less. We used a quota sampling approach in which households were contacted in randomized order. The gender to be interviewed for each household was randomly assigned so that we did not include men and women from the same household in the sample. The respondents were contacted by telephone by representatives of the district health centres and the screening questions were completed over the phone if the respondent was comfortable. In other cases, based on the preference of the respondents, the enumerators made an appointment to visit their household to complete the screening questions in person. Those who were classified as doers and non-doers were invited to complete the barrier analysis survey in person at the local health centre and an appointment was arranged with several options for times ranging from the early morning to early evening. The estimated self-reported portion size of doers was 348 g of fruit and 297 g of vegetables from two groups in the past 24 hours. By contrast, the estimated self-reported portion size of non-doers was 101 g of fruit and 128 g of vegetables in the past 24 hours.
format Conjunto de datos
id CGSpace109502
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Bioversity International
publisherStr Bioversity International
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1095022024-09-09T10:04:48Z Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam Truong, Mai Kennedy, Gina Tran, Thanh Do Phuong, Ngothiha Nguyen, Huu Bac acids acidos consumer behaviour comportamiento del consumidor food consumption consumo de alimentos food safety seguridad alimentaría food supply suministro de alimentos fruit frutos vegetables hortalizas Barrier analysis is completed with at least 45 doers of the behavior of interest and 45 non-doers who do not practice the behaviour. In this case, the behaviour of interest was the consumption of an adequate quantity and diversity of fruits and vegetables by low income adults in the focal neighbourhoods. Doers and non-doers were selected from the list of 300 lower-income households in the focal neighborhoods using screening questions. Respondents were asked to recount the fruits and vegetables they consumed in the past 24 hours and whether the amount they consumed was typical for them or not. Trained enumerators from NIN converted the reported serving sizes into an approximate number of grams using standardized conversion factors. Based on the answers to the screening questions, the respondents were classified as ‘doers’, ‘non-doers’ or ‘do not interview’. Doers met fruit target (200 g fruit) and vegetable target (200g vegetable from at least two MDDW groups) and normally consumed the same amount of fruits and vegetables or more. Nondoers did not meet the fruit target, did not meet the vegetable target and normally consume the same amount or less. We used a quota sampling approach in which households were contacted in randomized order. The gender to be interviewed for each household was randomly assigned so that we did not include men and women from the same household in the sample. The respondents were contacted by telephone by representatives of the district health centres and the screening questions were completed over the phone if the respondent was comfortable. In other cases, based on the preference of the respondents, the enumerators made an appointment to visit their household to complete the screening questions in person. Those who were classified as doers and non-doers were invited to complete the barrier analysis survey in person at the local health centre and an appointment was arranged with several options for times ranging from the early morning to early evening. The estimated self-reported portion size of doers was 348 g of fruit and 297 g of vegetables from two groups in the past 24 hours. By contrast, the estimated self-reported portion size of non-doers was 101 g of fruit and 128 g of vegetables in the past 24 hours. 2020-08-25 2020-09-15T15:38:29Z 2020-09-15T15:38:29Z Dataset https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109502 en Open Access Bioversity International Truong, M.; Meldrum, G.; Kennedy, G.; Tran, T.D.; Phuong, N.; Nguyen, H.B. (2020) Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/I53FX2, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:b2QsoAG6DtePg0ZHxjBFtA== [fileUNF]
spellingShingle acids
acidos
consumer behaviour
comportamiento del consumidor
food consumption
consumo de alimentos
food safety
seguridad alimentaría
food supply
suministro de alimentos
fruit
frutos
vegetables
hortalizas
Truong, Mai
Kennedy, Gina
Tran, Thanh Do
Phuong, Ngothiha
Nguyen, Huu Bac
Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam
title Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam
title_full Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam
title_fullStr Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam
title_short Barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in Hanoi, Vietnam
title_sort barrier analysis for daily fruit and vegetable consumption among low income consumers in hanoi vietnam
topic acids
acidos
consumer behaviour
comportamiento del consumidor
food consumption
consumo de alimentos
food safety
seguridad alimentaría
food supply
suministro de alimentos
fruit
frutos
vegetables
hortalizas
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109502
work_keys_str_mv AT truongmai barrieranalysisfordailyfruitandvegetableconsumptionamonglowincomeconsumersinhanoivietnam
AT kennedygina barrieranalysisfordailyfruitandvegetableconsumptionamonglowincomeconsumersinhanoivietnam
AT tranthanhdo barrieranalysisfordailyfruitandvegetableconsumptionamonglowincomeconsumersinhanoivietnam
AT phuongngothiha barrieranalysisfordailyfruitandvegetableconsumptionamonglowincomeconsumersinhanoivietnam
AT nguyenhuubac barrieranalysisfordailyfruitandvegetableconsumptionamonglowincomeconsumersinhanoivietnam