Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment

Based on primary data from fecal sludge (FS) treatment plants in three West African urban regions (Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso, Greater Accra in Ghana, and Grand Nokoué in Benin), FS collection and treatment patterns were analyzed to identify possible scenarios for resource recovery (RR) through FS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikiema, Josiane, Tanoh-Nguessan, R., Abiola, F., Cofie, Olufunke O.
Format: Informe técnico
Language:Inglés
Published: International Water Management Institute 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108822
_version_ 1855535456517619712
author Nikiema, Josiane
Tanoh-Nguessan, R.
Abiola, F.
Cofie, Olufunke O.
author_browse Abiola, F.
Cofie, Olufunke O.
Nikiema, Josiane
Tanoh-Nguessan, R.
author_facet Nikiema, Josiane
Tanoh-Nguessan, R.
Abiola, F.
Cofie, Olufunke O.
author_sort Nikiema, Josiane
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Based on primary data from fecal sludge (FS) treatment plants in three West African urban regions (Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso, Greater Accra in Ghana, and Grand Nokoué in Benin), FS collection and treatment patterns were analyzed to identify possible scenarios for resource recovery (RR) through FS co-composting. FS collection was analyzed for up to 7 years, in part per day, month and season, as well as FS characteristics to understand peak flows, FS qualities and related variations to plan for appropriate RR technology and capacities. Overall, the FS volumes collected by vacuum trucks were not significantly affected by the calendar days, months or seasons. Commonly assumed increases during rainy months were, for example, only recorded in Ouagadougou. FS composition appeared highly variable with a pronounced difference in total solids between FS collected from households versus institutional sources, likely indicating that institutions are served more frequently. The analyzed treatment plants appear to be exploited beyond their capacity. RR for reuse can turn sludge disposal from a cost into a source of revenue with co-benefits for farmers and the environment, thereby reducing the pressure on tipping fees. The probability of the added co-compost production being financially viable on its own was estimated for all the study sites, indicating an earliest breakeven point after 5 to 8 years.
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace108822
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher International Water Management Institute
publisherStr International Water Management Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1088222025-11-07T08:05:01Z Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment Nikiema, Josiane Tanoh-Nguessan, R. Abiola, F. Cofie, Olufunke O. resource recovery resource management reuse faecal sludge waste treatment solid wastes treatment plants composting logistics economic analysis waste management waste collection sewerage recycling waste disposal sludge dewatering anaerobic treatment septic tanks sanitation technology maintenance public-private partnerships investment business models cost recovery production costs operating costs marketing cost benefit analysis land use urban areas households Based on primary data from fecal sludge (FS) treatment plants in three West African urban regions (Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso, Greater Accra in Ghana, and Grand Nokoué in Benin), FS collection and treatment patterns were analyzed to identify possible scenarios for resource recovery (RR) through FS co-composting. FS collection was analyzed for up to 7 years, in part per day, month and season, as well as FS characteristics to understand peak flows, FS qualities and related variations to plan for appropriate RR technology and capacities. Overall, the FS volumes collected by vacuum trucks were not significantly affected by the calendar days, months or seasons. Commonly assumed increases during rainy months were, for example, only recorded in Ouagadougou. FS composition appeared highly variable with a pronounced difference in total solids between FS collected from households versus institutional sources, likely indicating that institutions are served more frequently. The analyzed treatment plants appear to be exploited beyond their capacity. RR for reuse can turn sludge disposal from a cost into a source of revenue with co-benefits for farmers and the environment, thereby reducing the pressure on tipping fees. The probability of the added co-compost production being financially viable on its own was estimated for all the study sites, indicating an earliest breakeven point after 5 to 8 years. 2020 2020-07-20T15:02:18Z 2020-07-20T15:02:18Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108822 en Open Access application/pdf International Water Management Institute Nikiema, Josiane; Tanoh-Nguessan, R.; Abiola, F.; Cofie, Olufunke O. 2020. Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 50p. (Resource Recovery and Reuse Series 17) [doi: 10.5337/2020.206]
spellingShingle resource recovery
resource management
reuse
faecal sludge
waste treatment
solid wastes
treatment plants
composting
logistics
economic analysis
waste management
waste collection
sewerage
recycling
waste disposal
sludge dewatering
anaerobic treatment
septic tanks
sanitation
technology
maintenance
public-private partnerships
investment
business models
cost recovery
production costs
operating costs
marketing
cost benefit analysis
land use
urban areas
households
Nikiema, Josiane
Tanoh-Nguessan, R.
Abiola, F.
Cofie, Olufunke O.
Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment
title Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment
title_full Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment
title_fullStr Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment
title_full_unstemmed Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment
title_short Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment
title_sort introducing co composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in benin and burkina faso a logistical and financial assessment
topic resource recovery
resource management
reuse
faecal sludge
waste treatment
solid wastes
treatment plants
composting
logistics
economic analysis
waste management
waste collection
sewerage
recycling
waste disposal
sludge dewatering
anaerobic treatment
septic tanks
sanitation
technology
maintenance
public-private partnerships
investment
business models
cost recovery
production costs
operating costs
marketing
cost benefit analysis
land use
urban areas
households
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108822
work_keys_str_mv AT nikiemajosiane introducingcocompostingtofecalsludgetreatmentplantsinbeninandburkinafasoalogisticalandfinancialassessment
AT tanohnguessanr introducingcocompostingtofecalsludgetreatmentplantsinbeninandburkinafasoalogisticalandfinancialassessment
AT abiolaf introducingcocompostingtofecalsludgetreatmentplantsinbeninandburkinafasoalogisticalandfinancialassessment
AT cofieolufunkeo introducingcocompostingtofecalsludgetreatmentplantsinbeninandburkinafasoalogisticalandfinancialassessment